horrible, could not answer her own exam questions. cannot imagine how she got her phd. worst prof in the world.

This woman is not very professional, and is one of those professors who teaches more to feed her ego than to actually teach others. Sorry, but it's the truth. Her classes are really easy too.

WOMAN CHILD

absolutely useless. doesn't mark papers based on rubric. can't answer any questions. disorganized. didn't even attend final exam.

Doesn't seem to know what she's talking about most of the time. Sometimes her own slides confuse her and she skips them. Lectures give the main points directly from the textbook without explanation or elaboration, but you need to go to class anyways to hear about chinese new year, because that will always be on the exam.

She rarely knows whats going on. She struggles to fill her 50 minute class time slot, often resorting to showing mindless youtube videos. She knows about as much about the course as the TA's did. No idea how someone with so many qualifications can be such a poor professor.

Made online quiz IMPOSSIBLE because class average was high. Try 80 multiple choice questions in 45 minutes on 4 chapters that you have to know in detail including memorization of statistics. And this is only worth 10 percent - too much stress for that weight.

Very disorganized with everything. Taking her class is stressful because you never know what is going on. If you don't have to, don't take it.

Seems like a caring and laid back prof but be careful with assignments. Her grading criteria seems straight forward but it really isn't. Sticks to the rules and can't empathize with students. Would not take another course of hers.

NEVER again. Grading criteria was unclear, and she was so disorganized. She was accessible outside of class to talk about grad school and resumes, but she wouldn't answer questions about material if it couldn't be generalized to the whole class. It was an easy mark, but I'd rather take a way harder class than suffer through that again.

Her lectures are awful, she's all over the place and always ends up talking about irrelevant things that happened in her life. I personally can't stand the way she teaches, but I had to go to all her lectures because there are class participation marks. Honestly, she knows her stuff but she cannot teach.

Chaung is an inconsiderate prof who does not care about the success of her students. Although her classes are easy, she is awful at communication and helping her students when needed. Don't even try to argue a mark because she will either ignore you or tell you there is nothing she can do.

Her assignments although seemly simple, are marked hard and most times don't make sense. It seems like a free for all even if you read all of the instructions you have a 1/2 chance of actually getting a good mark. This class is a bird course but with this prof... watch out.

Dr. Chuang is a unique professor, and I greatly respect her thoughtful announcements. However, she is a professor who does not want her own students to succeed. If the whole class does well above expectations on a test, she assumes that every student cheated and encourages TA's to mark very tough on the final assignment.

Dr. Chuang is a good and caring prof. For the most part the class was good, except for the final assignment. Tests and discussion posts were fair, but the 35% final project had vague instructions and was marked very hard.

The class itself if fairly easy expect for the finial project that ha vague instructions and it marked with specific aspects in mind. The prof herself comes off very rude in emails and is unfair.

I took this course thinking it would be a bird course. The TA marked the final assignment extremely hard. The majority of the class lost marks on things that weren't stated in the instructions. If the whole class was doing good, the prof would try to do something to make the average fall (hence how hard the assignment was marked).

Dr. Chuang is a very nice and respectful professor. But, the main issue with Ms. Chuang is that she assumes that every student cheats if the class average is higher than expected. This results in her and the TA's being more nitpicky with the final assignment (35%) and more unforgiving.

Overall not a terrible prof, but the final project had vague instructions and when it comes down to marking, marks will be taken off from things not mentioned in instructions.

She is quite unprofessional in regard to how she handles grading and technical issues. If you do well she will assume you are cheating. She instructed the TA's to pummel the class on the final assignment because the class average was high. My average was 96% until the final assignment where many people scored in the 30s.

I would not recommend taking this class with this prof. The class did very well on the 2 midterms, but this caused the prof to grade our final assignment harder because she doesn't like how high the average was. I was at 95% before the final assignment and dropped 17%. The marking for the final assignment was so unfair.

Terrible marking on final assignment!!! She fails students and then offers no help for students that ask for help. Professor tells TA's to mark very hard if class average is too high. Not fair!

I took FRHD1010 because I read everywhere that it is a bird course and good mark booster. The whole semester I felt that it was bird, lot of the exams were testbank type questions and available on google. BUT when the class performed well, this prof would get offended for some reason, and say we had too much time. Poor feedback, lots of attitude.

The professor gave midterms that were on hidden concepts deep in the textbook. Making it difficult to get good grades.The other opportunity was the final assignment. The professor made the criteria completely unclear and honestly made it clear for one way and then once submitted completely changed criteria making most of the class fail.

When students post questions, they aren't answered. The instructions are extremely unclear. Varying and contradictory instructions depending on where you look. Super unorganized, and it appears Susan took very little care in what the course would actually be like for students taking it.

This professor is unable to provide clear and concise instructions on how to complete assignments. She then blames the students for not completing the assignment correctly. I think that some reflection/responsibility is way overdue here. Have taught university courses for 20 years and never read such poorly worded/convoluted instructions.

She gives vague and unclear assignment instructions making it difficult to get a good grade.

Would not take again. She has very unclear assignment instructions and rubrics and constantly changes assignment requirements on the day that they are due. Blames many of her poor practices on the restrictions of online courses. TA-run discussion boards are generally the only place to get actual answers. The content itself is fine.

She is insufficient to provide students with clear and transparent information to complete assignments successfully. If students didn't follow instructions exactly as she unspokenly expects, she would blame students for it, and doesn't even care to help clarify anything. I would not take any course with this lady. Stay away from her if you can.

The professor has so many unspoken rules. She gave us updates which were contradictory to the assignment's instructions. Me and my peers were so confused about what to do. Never take any courses of this person. Don't waste your energy. Not good for your mental health.

The class requires simulations and quests on a paid program, which for me just looks like a black screen 90% of the time so I cant even complete them. The program looks like it was made in the 1800's. Completely unhelpful when I told her about this issue. Very clear this program the prof requires is just money in their pocket..

Not a good experience. Her instructions always contradict. Not friendly either.

Terrible experience. She barely explains anything and gets rude when you ask questions. Lessons felt stressful instead of helpful. Wouldn't recommend

Took this as a bird course, wouldn't recommend. Reads off slides and doesn't engage well, you ask her a question and she doesn't give a direct answer. Was very kind on marking and ensuring we could do our best, but overall all over the place. There is a group project for the course, rubric not specific and not a lot of guidance.

If you guys are ever thinking of doing research or working with her, DO NOT DO IT! She will have all these false promises and try to “buy you” by telling you she can help you reach all your goals. But when it comes to actually working with her she is extremely rude, arrogant, and she will make you feel that you are incompetent. Save your mental!

Prof. Chuang was an interesting professor to say the least, her slideshows were not well organized and rubrics were very vague. When approached she is rude and doesn't fully answer the question asked. The textbook readings were very time consuming and the quizzes were very repetitive. The tests and exams were also on very specific material.

The content is pretty easy but if you take this course you're going to be teaching yourself. I skipped this class as 3 hours of listening to her talk is torture. her slides make no sense and is all in abbreviations she made up. most of the work is online and easy to get a 100. if you come to her, know it's not getting fixed unless asked 10 times