Horribly structured class. No structure, actually. First few weeks were torture, but once you realize no one else knows what's going on either it gets a lot better. Neither tests nor class curved, but impossible tests were graded fairly easy. Multiple coding assignments due at the end of the week, 2 tests no final. Extra credit ops here and there.

ENGR 112 will be hard no matter who you take it with. Wickliff was very understanding - she moved deadlines around a lot to work with student schedules. She changed plenty of requirements for the lego project making it hard to know what she expects. Get a skilled coder on your team. MATLAB project takes time. Do not expect high scores on the exams.

If you're completely blind and cannot read a powerpoint yourself, this is the prof for you. Barely teaches any content besides blatantly reading slideshow after slideshow and expecting it to stick. But hey, on the bright side she does push an occasional Friday due date to Sunday evening.

A bit confusing until you understand the structure of the class. She's a nice lady and tends to move around due dates a lot to work with students, but the TAs do a majority of the work. Homework is individual, but in-class assignments are in groups, so you'd better be prepared to get along well with who you sit with. An overall decent class, though

Mrs. Wickliff is one of the best profs for ENGR102 due to her class structure. She has mostly reasonable assignments, but is strict about deadlines. Most grading/tests are handled by the TA's, but she does give lectures and writes the final. Lectures can run long, but she reasonably cover the content. I'd recommend her, but she isn't exceptional.

The information presented in class was unrelated and scattered over a variety of topics, however, Wickliff did a pretty decent job of teaching the material each week. There was also a 3-hour group lab for the class each week (7 labs) for about 70% of the grade, but the in-class TA's aren't very knowledgeable/helpful (Wickliff does not teach this).

Dr Wickliff is a fine teacher. She explains things pretty well and is willing to help students. However, about half of my grades were done the last week of class, so I had no idea what my grade would be. Tests and assignments can be tough, but are pretty heavily curved so not a lot to worry about.

Dr. Wickliff is alright. During lectures, she reads off powerpoints. If you've never coded, this class is going to be hard. Lectures scratch the surface of what is asked in our labs. You have an individual and group lab every week and some can take forever to do. Just make sure you don't miss any assignments because they are valuable points.

The lectures were often not enough to do the weekly programming assignments, but the textbook helped a lot in that regard. All feedback and grading was done by my TAs, and it was done poorly with assignments being graded weeks after they were due, and with little feedback, although I cannot really fault Professor Wickliff for that.

I couldn't tell you if Wickliff actually knows Python or not. She just reads off a powerpoint and goes off on tangents about getting internships and elevator pitches. Her TAs do most of the grading and it's probably better to ask them for help than her. She is however a VERY lenient grader and gives back a lot of points if you just talk to her!

Luckily I had a good group that was willing to meet outside of class to complete group projects. As time went on, I started going to more SI sessions and went to the TA's for help on labs. Wickliff just reads off slides but still better than other profs. Got 70s on both tests and still got an A so don't over stress you'll make it.

The recitations were led by the professor, where she would usually fly through tons of slides so taking notes should usually be done after class. The labs were pretty straightforward and short. The lab reports were the most tedious part of it, but easy if you had adequate help from your partners.

Class is easy with previous coding experience, without it's a pain. Lectures minimally useful, experience and learning from other students who know how to code is the way to go.

Very enthusiastic professor! Does not teach well whatsoever but she is a lovely woman. Just make sure to study for the final at the end of the semester and to understand how to find uncertainties in the lab and the class will be a breeze. Weekly homework is a participation grade half the time.

I took Dr. Wickliff for ENGR/PHYS 216. She is nice and seems to care about the students, but she does not give helpful homework nor does she really explain topics well in class. She reads straight from the lecture notes and does not give any extra explanation, so though I never skipped class, I wish I did because attending did not help me at all.

Bad lecturer in a class that needs a lot of explanation. Powerpoints did not match homework and topics did not match labs or 206 topics. Subject is hard and she doesn't make it better. She is sweet and caring but not good prof. Hard to get in contact through email. Small bit of extra credit. Biweekly labs, weekly hw and final. Final is curved lots.

I do not even know how to rate Wickliff. I find myself hating and loving this woman at the same time. The pros are that she assigns very little in comparison to other professors and she is very nice. The cons are that little HW means you do not learn much and her lectures are terrible and do not help you in preparation for the final W person L prof

The ratings for this professor are very accurate, She isn't the best professor in the universe, but she isn't a bad professor either. Her weekly tests could be easier, with some of them having unrelevant topics in them, so if you don't understand something in an earlier lecture week, you need to figure it out later regardless.

She was an average professor. Very nice with decent lectures. She gave us extra credit opportunities and let us collaborate on some of the harder quizzes, which did help a lot.

Dr. Wickliff's lectures can sometimes be difficult to follow, and her tests are often disproportionally difficult compared to the expectations of the rest of the course, but she is a kind person and does her best to get you a good grade while dealing with all the nonsense requirements that the university requires from her course.

she was mid, would just read thru the lect. slides (posted on canvas) lots of group work, you have a lab group that has assignments every week test heavy, there's only two exams (mid/final), rest is lab assignments and other easy A assignments so helps boost the test grades you DO NOT need coding experience,they teach you everything,don't be scared

Dr. Wickliff was the epitome of average. Her lectures were good for the quizzes but she wasn't much help outside of that. Her TAs wrote all of her exams and quizzes so she didn't really know how to help with those. Also, the class has a bunch of labs that take forever, especially if everyone in your group is new to python. Time consuming, not heard

Dr. Wickliff is an average professor. She reads from the slides and goes on tangents which makes the class super boring. Find a good group that you can work with even if y'all are new to python. A responsive and motivated group will make this class so much easier. LOTS OF TIME CONSUMING HOMEWORK

ENGR 102 is going to be hard, So be prepared to put in a lot of time and effort if you want a decent grade. Wickliff reads off of slides, so you're better off teaching yourself for the most part. But she wants you to do well and will give you many chances to boost your grade Lost of quizzes, most are easy Lots of extra credit opportunities

Dr. Wickliff was an incredibly nice professor and she really wanted students to do well in her class. Learning python before is HUGE, due to there being individual and group coding assignments every week. Exams are very hard, so studying is VERY important for each exam. She is very knowledgeable, but class didn't feel like intro to coding.

Wickliff is a professor who teaches something she is not fully familiar with herself. She will lecture off of powerpoint presentations and usually doesn't add much to them. Her assignments are very challenging later on in the semester and the exams are brutal. However, she is a nice woman and does try to help (mostly by looking at keys though).

She's a nice women, but coasts on the back of her TAs. Consistently arrives to class late. If you really want an A in her class it's definitely possible. I just think as a top ranked engineering school we could do better. Her teaching style wasn't super memorable. At least she wanted to see everyone succeed, and final project was a free 100.

Easy class if you get a good group, and get in the habit of meeting up with them to work on the weekly group assignments. She doesn't seem to have a great understanding of python, so the TAs are your best bet for getting help. She is really kind and entertaining though, and wants to see all her students succeed. Final was p much participation.

She's alright just reads of the slides in class and doesn't seem to be super literate in programming. The final project was easy. The quizzes can be grade killers as they are only 2-5 questions typically. As long as you finish all the labs and do decent on the exams you'll be fine.

This professor was engaged with her students but not during her lectures. I interacted with the TAs significantly more than her.

She's very understanding if you have to miss a quiz for something but a pretty average lecturer. She loves to promote getting internships, but for a freshman that was kinda hard to actually do so.. Overall a pretty average professor, the class is just a pain with all the group projects.

216 is just a weird class across the board. None of the professors know how to teach it and you pretty much have to entirely self study the material/practice exam for the final. That being said, Dr. Wickliff assigned very little homework relatively speaking. She is incredibly caring and responds quick to emails. Good person bad prof.

I learned practically nothing in this class and didn't do great on the final but she's chill.

She really doesn't teach well and more of just states the content off slides. The assignments are pretty easy, both labs and quizzes, so if you just turn them all in you'll get a good grade in the class. I did have to self teach, but it was really just from practicing writing code. Final was awful, one of the hardest I've taken in my life.

Her lectures are okay, and she's a great speaker, but the class is difficult if you don't already know Python. I expected some rounding or a curve, but none was applied, which made the exams especially hard for students without prior Python experience.