3.6

Teresa Castelao-Lawless

Philosophy - Grand Valley State University

3.6
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
53%
Would Retake
113
Reviews
3.6
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
3.8
Helpful
3.4
Clarity

53%

Would Retake

113

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

38

4

34

3

19

2

16

1

6

What Students Say

One of those professors that thinks she's teaching a graduate school seminar and grades accordingly for a 100 level intro gen ed philosophy class

PHI102 - 2.0 rating

Avoid her at all costs

PHI102 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 30 grades
Most common grades:
A (13)
B+ (5)
B (4)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(6)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(8)
Based on 34 reported grades
A: 13
B+: 5
B: 4
A-: 3
Common Tags
Get ready to read (14)
Participation matters (11)
Tough Grader (10)
Lecture heavy (8)
Skip class? You won't pass. (7)
Caring (7)
Amazing lectures (6)
Graded by few things (5)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.69 avg change
Dec
Apr
Feb
Nov
Jan
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHI314

5.0

(1)

PHI341

4.7

(3)

PHI201

4.5

(2)

PHI101

4.2

(6)

PHI102SW

4.0

(1)
+13 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PSI102

5.0

PHI102SW

4.0

HSC20102

4.0

ETHICS102

3.8

102

3.5

Reviews (113)
4.0
4.0
PHI102
Grade: A+
Mar 15, 2001

a little unclear on papers/projects, expect lots of reading and boring lectures

4.0
3.0
PHI102
May 13, 2001

Makes Ethics as interesting as she can

4.0
2.0
PHI102
Sep 26, 2001

Good overall prof.

4.0
4.0
HSC201
Nov 30, 2001

No Comments

4.0
4.0
PHI102SW
Dec 11, 2001

Very hard grader, but if you make yourself known to her she'll be easier on you.

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Dec 19, 2001

She is very helpful, no tests, and rewrites on papers, best philosphy teacher.

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Jan 7, 2002

Great Prof, passionate about students learning, just do rewrites for an "A"

3.0
3.0
PHI440
Jan 8, 2002

HOT, passionate about the subject

5.0
1.0
PHI102
Jan 12, 2002

No Comments

4.0
3.0
PHIL102
Jan 28, 2002

No Comments

4.0
3.0
PHI102
Apr 19, 2002

Really nice and a pretty decent prof. Gets crazy and excited about the subject.

4.0
3.0
PHI102
Apr 23, 2002

teacher is nice, but boring, grades hard in non-sws class

5.0
2.0
PHI102
May 6, 2002

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Oct 14, 2002

Very helpful, wants you to succeed, very passionate about the subject!

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Nov 17, 2002

Great professor, get her to know your name, and your set! be prepared to study!

4.0
3.0
PHI103
Dec 17, 2002

quite energetic + very helpful. go to class, ask questions, get an A

5.0
1.0
PHI101
Mar 25, 2003

ohhh baby!!! She is HOT!!

5.0
3.0
PHI102
Apr 17, 2003

Very nice teacher. Is easy to understand. Hard marker, but lets you redo papers. She's hot for teacher!!

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Jun 4, 2003

No Comments

5.0
3.0
PHI102
Jun 30, 2003

Very funny. Accent makes her hard to understand sometimes and handwriting is even worse, but she's easy to work with. All you have to do is pay attention in class and ask questions from time to time.

4.0
3.0
PHI102
Oct 1, 2003

She's very nice, but there's not many possible points so everything counts. She's explains everything really whell though.

4.0
2.0
PHI102
Oct 17, 2003

Pretty easy class, do the papers ahead of time and have her edit them before due date and you'll get an A. Attendance is the only other way to get points so SHOW UP. Very nice prof.

3.0
3.0
102
Nov 17, 2003

Kind of Helpful, terrible handwriting and still learning the english language a bit. Have to show up for grade, easy but extremely boring.

4.0
2.0
PHI102
Dec 4, 2003

Pretty good class. I thought there would be more discussion but the people in my class didn't want to. Very nice. Pretty funny too.

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Dec 6, 2003

Really nice prof. Fairly easy grader, if you use a lot of your notes when you write it. REALLY STRICT attendance policy!! Handwriting is really bad though.

5.0
3.0
PHI102
Dec 6, 2003

Can get kinda boring. Grades pretty hard so do papers early and have her check it before the due date.

5.0
1.0
HSC201
Dec 15, 2003

Okay, you MUST attend lecture, she takes attendance EVERY lecture. This class was really interesting. She grades essays hard but if you listen and take a LOT of notes you will do fine!

2.0
2.0
PHI103
Mar 10, 2004

I do not recommend taking this class. She grades her papers hard and is not clear about what she wants in her assignments. I got A's in all of my other hard science classes, and ended up with a B- for this class. It was the most boring class I have had.

4.0
4.0
PHI102
Mar 16, 2004

She is a really hard teacher, but a good one. Her lectures tend to be BORING!! but only because she goes on and on about some random subject. HORRIBLE HAND-WRITING

5.0
3.0
PHI102
Mar 21, 2004

Must attend class, class is very hard and intimidating at first, but then gets much easier. For papers, make an appt. with her and you'll get a much better grade. She's a little hard, but very nice and helpful.

5.0
3.0
HSC201
Mar 23, 2004

Very nice prof. Passionate about subject, material sort of difficult but ask questions & she'll answer it as best as she can. Counts attendance! Tells you everything you need for final and gives you a cheat sheet. Overall good prof!

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Grade: B
Dec 13, 2004

awesome, knowledgeable, energetic teacher. very thorough in lecture. easy to understand material. she's a very sweet woman. TAKE HER CLASS!

4.0
3.0
HSC201
Dec 15, 2004

Very nice lady,extremely passionate about what she teaches,tries a little too hard sometimes.It is difficult to get kids excited at 8 in the morning. She really knows her stuff,but has favorites. If you miss even 2 classes, expect to lose pts. and for her to tell people infront of the entire class.

4.0
2.0
PHI101
Jan 10, 2005

Teacher was very understanding. If you ever needed help she was there, she had a sense of humor, and new how to make a boring class more understanding, and intersting, take this professor for this class!

4.0
3.0
PHI102
Nov 2, 2005

Bad handwriting, talks fast, very fun and energetic, loves to teach. Very helpful if you ask for it. Talk to her before a test, she will help you understand what you need to know. Test can be hard and the lecture can get boring but go to class because she takes attendance. It is a good class but I suggest taking it as a credit/no credit class.

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Nov 3, 2005

Thinks shes funnier than she is. Tests are easy. Strict attendance policy, but easy stuff. Tests are an essay about ONE of the philosophers you discussed in that section. So really, you only have to pay attention on one day!

5.0
3.0
HSC201
Nov 29, 2005

Great Professor. So nice and so helpful. The exams aren't too bad - study the handouts and your good to go. A lot of things are repetitive. Lectures can be boring, but it's easy to pass with an A or B.

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Grade: B+
Nov 30, 2005

easy entry level course. very hyper prof. not above embaresing students, which can be quite amusing. atendance policy is unrealistic considering how very dull lectures can be. no time in lecture for student discussion because that would take away from her constant talking.

3.0
4.0
PHI102
Dec 1, 2005

She likes to pick on students but rarely asks them questions. I didn't like how the whole class was 3 papers with an awful attendance policy. She can lecture on her subjects very well if you can listen for that long, or read her hand writting to take the notes!

5.0
4.0
EXISTENTIALISM
Dec 2, 2005

She's really nice and is a great help outside of class- always takes the time to get to know students..even when that subject is hard..like Existentialism....

5.0
3.0
HSC201
Dec 20, 2005

Very knowledgable and passionate about the subject. Cares about the students understanding what she is saying. Lectures can be boring and very confusing, she likes to skip around from subject to subject. Just do the reading and study the material and you'll do good.

3.0
2.0
HSC201
Jan 18, 2006

She is very nice but the class is SO boring. It was easy though cuz there was no homework just a couple of easy tests. I actually got a B when I read the book and an A when I didn't. Just read her summaries...oh she hates people who skips and it will affect your grade.

3.0
3.0
PHI103
Apr 1, 2006

She's not very good at writing on the board, which is most of the class. You basically learn about philosophers, take notes and take essay tests, presentation at the end of the semester, 3-4 tests altogether, no homework. Overall a pretty good teacher, hard time reading her handwriting, plus she has an accent. Overall good teacher.

4.0
1.0
PHI103
Apr 19, 2008

Very nice lady, easy grading, she lets you decide what you want to write about on the exams, very eager to help outside of class, would highly recommend. the only part that is bad is her handwriting and the attendance policy. take her if you don't mind going to class!

4.0
3.0
HSC201
Jan 5, 2009

Good teacher, slight accent but still easy to understand. Makes the subject rather interesting considering what it was.

4.0
3.0
PHI102
Apr 15, 2009

Take it SWS! You write three papers total (including final) and attendance is not mandatory but makes up about 15% of your grade. Her handwriting is TERRIBLE but she is a good prof who is willing to help as much as possible. She has a slight accent but it is still easy to understand. She sometimes makes fun of students...but still worth taking.

1.0
5.0
PHI102
Apr 21, 2009

Horrible teacher. You won't be able to understand anything she writes on the bored. She does not understand the concept of a grading system. Was constantly changing requirements for test's. DO NOT TAKE HER!

5.0
3.0
PHI201
May 17, 2009

So she has bad hand writing. She's very helpful and loves the subject. Attendance is manditory...in college. Take her if you want a professor that cares.

4.0
2.0
PHI102
Nov 3, 2009

She is very interested in philosophy which is an absolute plus. I love having her as a teacher beccause her passion and interest in this makes me want to learn. So far Im getting a C+halfway through the class. Not much work besides light reading. PLUS she has a sense ofhumor and lovestalking to her students

3.0
2.0
HSC101
Dec 11, 2010

A good class, had trouble staying awake. Interesting matrial...the first time it was presented. The teaching style is boring and her hand writing isn't good. She tries to be personable, but is more awkward than anything. Over all, a good teacher.

5.0
3.0
PHI495
Apr 27, 2011

Best professor at GVSU. My favorite thing about this class was Professor Castelao! She is so smart, and so genuine. Plus, she really cares about her students. I will really miss her.

1.0
5.0
PSI102
Dec 8, 2012

TERRIBLE TEACHER!!!!!! do not take her! you can not read her hand writing or understand. She was gone for over half the semester and we couldnt miss one day! VERY hard grader!! DO NOT TAKE HER!!!!!!!!!!! unless you want to fail.

3.0
1.0
PHI102
Dec 10, 2012

Class is super boring, I would suggest you bring a laptop to keep you from falling asleep. TERRIBLE HANDWRITIG. Terrible grader, I think she just guesses a grade. Overall an easy class but attendence is mandatory.

1.0
4.0
PHI102
Dec 13, 2012

Terrible teacher. I have no idea how she has an overall 4.0 rating on here. She's extremely dull and uninteresting. Her class is lecture the whole time. Mandatory attendance. Has the hand writing of a 3 year old so its very difficult to take notes. Very unclear on exams. I legitimately fell asleep in her class which I have never done before.

5.0
1.0
PHI102
Dec 14, 2012

Easiest class ever.Very few assignments and they were like 1-2 pg papers. All exams were either take home or she gave you the questions 1-2 weeks before hand. If you want an A you'll get one.I did 1extra credit assignment(which she offers plenty of) and ended up with a 105%. Never had one percent taken off. Show up and look up the answers on google

2.0
5.0
PHI101
Jan 17, 2013

Class was WAY to hard for an intro gen Ed. All exams are in essay form and they are not easy! The reading is hard enough let alone writing about it. She's nice as a person but far to hard for a 101 class

4.0
1.0
PHI201
Mar 17, 2013

She's nice and the class is fun. She is from Portugal, so she has an accent, but I is easy to understand. She has VERY bad handwriting, but covers the topics thoroughly enough that you can get it all down in your notes by listening. She gives you a set of questions in advance and then there's three of them on the actual exam.She wants thoroughness

3.0
5.0
PHI102
Mar 26, 2013

This class is really boring, I can hardly stay awake in it. She grades extremely hard on the exams which are all essays. Take a different prof if at all possible!!

5.0
4.0
PHI102
Apr 6, 2013

Professor Lawless is the best teacher I have had since I started her at GVSU. She is very willing to engage in converstation/debate with the students, and always explains things in a clear and detailed manner. She is very funny, and is willing to help each student succeed individually depending on their strengths/weaknesses.

4.0
2.0
PHI102
Apr 23, 2013

I hated this class but really only because of the material. She was really specific in her explanations and lectures so that I understood the authors sometimes without even doing the readings. Also on all of my exams which are essays, I got a much better grade than expected so I'd say she's an easy grader

5.0
1.0
PHI102
May 9, 2013

Awesome teacher, handwriting is shaky, but if you listen to her words you can put 2+2 together and figure out what it says. Easy tests and essays if you use examples of philosophy from your life. Doesn't shy away from a philosophical debate. Lots of extra credit opportunities! Very good class and teacher.

3.0
3.0
PHI102
Dec 10, 2013

Her handwriting is a little bit hard to understand at times, but she is always willing to go back and clarify. The class overall is fairly easy, but the reading can be difficult at times.

3.0
4.0
PHI102
Dec 11, 2013

Her handwriting is horrible! She knows her stuff but she expects a lot from her students, she does not use BB so you dont know how you're doing til the end of semester.

4.0
4.0
PHI102
Dec 18, 2013

HORRIBLE handwriting, which makes learning a bit difficult. She is a pro on the material she teaches, so expects you to eventually be too. Boring lectures, but the homework and tests aren't too bad. Don't take it unless you absolutely have to.

2.0
4.0
PHI102
Grade: B+
Dec 23, 2013

Don't take this class if you don't have her. She is a rough grader..When you pick to write about a philosopher do not pick the harder one, she will not give you more points, she will grade you the same as everyone else. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS, She makes this class so boring. DIFFICULT GRADER

3.0
3.0
PHI102
Mar 7, 2014

Biggest issue was terrible handwriting. She writes all of her notes and refuses to use Power-point. All of her tests are hand-written. It's a regular class but she treats it like an SWS course. English is a second language for her which makes it difficult to understand. Very nice woman,and if you do go to office hours, she can help.

2.0
4.0
PHI102
Apr 2, 2014

Horrible handwriting and she knows it. Talks extremely fast. Expects you to be an expert on the philosopher you choose for you exam. All free response to questions she writes which aren't always clear. From portugal- has accent. VERY TOUGH GRADER. and then you can't read any comments she makes on your essays... horrible experience. hated it all.

4.0
3.0
PHI102
Apr 3, 2014

Pretty good, can't read her writing though

5.0
2.0
PHI101
Apr 23, 2014

Bad handwriting, but an awesome woman. Very helpful and loves to get the class involved. She is extremely intelligent and speaks english very well, even though it is her third language. Seriously awesome lady.

3.0
4.0
102
Dec 9, 2014

Her class is quite difficult, even when you read all of your materials. Your grade is based off of three tests, so if you do bad on them, then it's difficult to pass. She allows students to get up to 5 points of extra credit to help cushion grades. You have no homework, just reading. Her writing is illegible, but you can ask her to repeat stuff.

3.0
3.0
ETHICS102
Dec 11, 2014

She has horrible handwriting but she knows it and is willing to repeat it. She's nice but makes awkward jokes and points out random people and can make you feel weird. She claims your grade is based off a variety of things but it's really only based on the 3 tests which are fine as long as you read and take good notes

5.0
2.0
PHI102
Grade: A-
Oct 7, 2015

Honestly this is the easiest class you will take. She doesn't give homework, all you have to do is the readings. She's a great teacher and keeps the class interesting. Almost always lets the class go early. Her tests are easy bc you basically know exactly what is going to be on the and you pick the chapter of the book that you want your test on

2.0
4.0
PHI102
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 16, 2015

She is very passionate bout what she teaches, but has trouble communicating with students. The book is very hard to understand and her explanations are often contradictory. She talks fast and is sometimes hard to understand. You can not read a single thing she writes. The grading criteria on tests is confusing and you cannot read her comments.

5.0
1.0
PHI102
Grade: A
Dec 22, 2015

PHI 102 with Professor Lawless was the easiest college course I have EVER taken. Those who think this class is hard, probably do poorly in all of their courses. If you cannot comprehend common sense wisdom then DO NOT take this course. Your grade is based off of three essay exams. You'll do poorly if you do not elucidate your responses thoroughly.

5.0
1.0
PHI102
Grade: A
Dec 23, 2015

She always wants you to understand the material and she presents it in a very understanding way. She let students with poor test grades make corrections to their essays in order to boost their grade. I would register for one of her classes again!

2.0
4.0
PHI102
Grade: B+
Feb 17, 2016

Do not take her!!! Makes it clear she only gives out a few A's. Extremely tough grader, has horrible hand writing, and is very rude. If you get on her good side she will grade you easier though. If you get stuck with her, go to her office hours and if you get a bad grade on an exam, go talk to her and she will let you redo it. Avoid her though!!

2.0
5.0
PHI102
Feb 23, 2016

One of those professors that thinks she's teaching a graduate school seminar and grades accordingly for a 100 level intro gen ed philosophy class

2.0
4.0
ETHICS102
Feb 25, 2016

She is very rude, a very tough grader, and has the worst hand writing I've ever seen. You have to be VERY specific and detailed on your exams or you will not do good. She also laughs at people opinions, makes them feel stupid, and talks over everyone when they're trying to explain what they're thinking. I hated this class. I do not recommend it.

2.0
5.0
PHI102
Grade: C-
Mar 31, 2016

Run away as fast as you can! Her handwriting is horrendous, her tests have to be exact word for word or you will not pass the test. She expects a lot from you! I did all the homework, all the reading and prepared myself for every test and she graded the tests so harsh. Not only is her teaching hard to understand but she has a tough accent.

4.0
4.0
PHI102
Grade: B
Dec 7, 2016
Would take again

Professor Lawless is very passionate about her work. It's a breath of fresh air. She loves philosophy and she wants you to understand it and love it too. She has a slight accent but nothing you should be worried about. However her handwriting is bad, but just listen to her words and you'll be fine. Her lectures are mind-bendingly eye-opening.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
2.0
4.0
PHI102
Grade: A
Dec 8, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Avoid her at all costs. Her handwriting is very poor and her notes are all over the place on the board. She grades her exams as if it is a graduate level class (spelling also matters). She belittles the class because we are all undergrads and do not have a PhD like her (she constantly talks about her education). Class is passable but not suggested.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
4.0
3.0
PHI102
Dec 10, 2016
Would take again

Her lectures are very well planned out and she is clearly very intelligent and knowledgeable about philosophy. She is very passionate about what she teaches and it is super inspirational! Her lectures are very engaging and make the material interesting and if you follow her directions and keep up with the reading, the tests are not too hard!

Get ready to read
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
2.0
5.0
ETHICS102
Grade: B-
Dec 11, 2016
Wouldn't take again

She was clearly passionate and knowledgeable about philosophy, however, she described her grading process as such: "A C in my class is an A in every other professor's classes". I'm an all A student and I am shooting for a B-.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
5.0
2.0
PHI102
Grade: A
Dec 22, 2016
Would take again

Very nice professor and clearly very knowledgeable-- once spent 15 minutes talking about how she learned to love Aristotle in college. Her handwriting can be hard to read, so make sure to ask her for clarification, because you're going to want to take notes. Really hates cell phones during class, so use them with caution or risk being called out.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Caring
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
ETHICS102
Apr 4, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Overall this was not a terrible class. However, her handwriting is atrocious so when you get tests back you will have no idea why you got the grade you did. She looks for very specific answers on tests and if you don't give her those answers(tests are all essays) you will lose significant points. Only grades are 2 tests and final

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
ETHICS102
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 12, 2017
Wouldn't take again

It's hard to know what she's looking for. You really have to work hard to get an A, since she reminds us how often she doesn't just give those out. Notes may be difficult to take since her handwriting is horrific, but if you meet with her outside of class you can clear things up. She's not horrible, but she's definitely not the best prof I've had.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
4.0
3.0
PHI102
Grade: A-
Dec 14, 2017
Would take again

Prof. Lawless is very passionate about ethics. People complain about not doing well on tests, but it is just a matter of paying attention in class. She is known to ramble, but if you just stick through it, she gives you everything you need to do well. I would take her again because she is funny and nice. Attendance is mandatory for a grade.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
3.0
4.0
PHI102
Grade: B
Dec 20, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Homework is just reading a couple of pages, which is great. When you need clarification on notes or have a question, she will explain it in the most confusing way, and will go off topic or ramble to the point where you forget what the question even was. Her handwriting is atrocious, but she will clarify. Rarely gives As, which is disappointing.

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Tests are tough
5.0
3.0
PHI102
Grade: A
Dec 27, 2017
Would take again

A really passionate, kind, and knowledgeable prof. She makes an effort to learn names. Her classes are all lecture with no slides so notetaking is key. This is sometimes difficult because she is very rambly. If Ethics is of interest to you and you understand/enjoy it, you will do great. If you couldn't care less and don't listen you'll fail.

Inspirational
Hilarious
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
PHI250
Grade: B-
Jan 9, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Got C- or lower on every paper, but with grades such as participation and attendance, still ended with a decent grade in her class. Try your best to be her friend, and dont use phones in class or she'll call you out.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
3.0
5.0
PHI102
Mar 29, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Giving her an average because I expect a college course to be challenging. She probably made it more difficult than it should have been. If you dont repeat everything word from word from her lectures on the exam, you get marked down. I was able to pass this class because she ended up leaving at the end of the semester.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
PHI101
Grade: A
Nov 13, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I absolutely dreaded going to her class the first few weeks. But after the moral theories were done, I thoroughly enjoyed her class. She is actually pretty funny and definitely knows what she is talking about. Note taking is key and it has to be by hand so if you don't like handwritten notes don't take her!

Tough Grader
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
PHI101
Grade: A+
Dec 29, 2018
Would take again

Professor Lawless was a fantastic prof! She is a very passionate teacher and gives her students thorough notes. She has an awesome sense of humor, but will NOT hesitate to call a student out if they're being disrespectful. She says she doesn't give A's out, but her intro PHI course is impossible to fail if you take notes & do the assigned reading.

Participation matters
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
1.0
4.0
PHI102
Mar 29, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I'm not even done with the semester and I hate Lawless. Refuses to be "ethical" about the exam grading when answers are VERY specific and correct. 99/10 would not take again.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
2.0
4.0
PHI102
Apr 8, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Professor Castelao-Lawless was a very nice lady and certainly tried to make class bearable, but wasn't a very good teacher. She's hard to follow in her lectures. Her handwriting is also atrocious and thats how all notes are taken. Only two tests and the final go into the grade book, so if you're not a good test taker then don't take her course.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Test heavy
4.0
4.0
HSC201
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 16, 2019
Would take again

I enjoyed having prof Castelao-Lawless. I told her at the beginning of the semester that I hated reading and she made a solid effort to make sure I enjoyed the reading. She is very passionate about history and is extremely knowledgeable on the subject. Just read what you are supposed to and take good notes and it will be hard to get a bad grade.

Get ready to read
Caring
Tough grader
1.0
3.0
PHI495
Aug 2, 2020
Wouldn't take again

This woman is awful, i can handle tough teachers, but when you are disrespected,treated poorly told your thoughts do no matter; specifically when they are not in agreement with hers. She claimed my work was that of a high schooler, I transfred back to Univeristy of Colorado where I finished my academic career with high marks. avoid her if possible!

1.0
2.0
PHI250
Nov 16, 2020
Wouldn't take again

ugh. not happy with this lady. she is such a stickler (even during a pandemic) and has no empathy for her students. be prepared to follow her rules precisely, or lose points. it doesn't really matter if you're good at writing or philosophy, she cares more about enforcing her meaningless rules without any leniency. avoid if possible (esp. online)

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
4.0
2.0
PHI102
Grade: A-
Dec 16, 2020
Would take again

Never taken ethics before, and she made it seem easy. Lectures were always interesting and I learned a lot of valuable things.

Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
Lecture heavy
3.0
4.0
HSC20102
Grade: A
Jan 3, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I started out the semester not really liking this class because it required mainly just watching lectures and then having to take your own notes for the test. No homework, no quizzes, just 3 tests. The first test I did terrible, but then when I started trying a bit harder and taking good notes it got a lot easier. Just pay attention you'll be good.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
HSC201
Grade: B+
Mar 2, 2021
Wouldn't take again

shes difficult to understand at times, and i just didnt like her teaching methods at all.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
2.0
3.0
HSC201
Grade: A
Apr 20, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Professors knows A LOT about her subject, so dont go searching google for answers because they will be wrong. Her lectures are very boring with no visuals or powerpoints whatsoever, strictly just her talking. There are only 3 tests the entire year so you must do good on them. If you take good notes on lectures and pay attention youll be fine

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
4.0
2.0
HSC201
Grade: B
Apr 25, 2021
Would take again

One of the nicest professors I've had. She is understanding, caring, and respectful. Her lectures are just her talking so if you're a visual learning i wouldn't reccommend. But I enjoyed her lectures cause it felt more like a conversation and you could become really engaged and inspired. Overall very easy to get a good grade, only 3 open note tests

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHI314
Grade: A
May 3, 2021
Would take again

Shes really caring and understanding. But there were only 4 grades for the class each worth 25%, attendance and 3 essays. But she wasnt a tough grader. There was a reading for each class period, but she also provided a handout for each to help. Other than that it was a short lecture about the reading and then a class discussion.

Participation matters
Graded by few things
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHI341
Grade: A
May 5, 2021
Would take again

She was a great professor and genuinely was interested in the experiences of her students. Her lectures were long but always interesting and inspiring. She would remember things her students said the first week of class and go back to them later in the semester. She really cares, and if you show up and show interest in the class, it's an easy A

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Caring
4.0
2.0
PHI341
Dec 11, 2021
Would take again

Super nice professor that cares about her students! Definitely go to class because participation and attendance is a part of the grade. This course is mainly reading outside of class and discussing it in class. There's only 3 papers so make sure to do well on them. Overall easy class with this professor!

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
4.0
4.0
HSC201
Dec 25, 2021
Would take again

The only thing that matters in her class is the in class discussions because its the majority of your grade. She can be hard to understand at points but nothing too terrible and shes very knowledgeable. Also a very nice lady and will work with you as much as she can if anything comes up.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Amazing lectures
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
PHI102
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2022
Would take again

She is a queen. There are no exams. Three papers that are well explained and are clear what the topics are. Attendance is expected because you get points for class. Overall she is very nice and helpful. I would recommend her.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
HSC201
Grade: A
Apr 4, 2023
Would take again

I took this class because I needed to fulfill my history credit, and I am glad that I took this class. Her lectures were long and boring, but she is very interactive with us as participation does matter. There are "quests" almost weekly, and they are really easy. The tests are online and are writing, but you CANNOT look up anything or she will know

Participation matters
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
PHI102
Grade: A
Feb 29, 2024
Would take again

Love this lady! She is so funny and a super kind human! Terrible handwriting ngl and you can't miss class but honestly why would you want too she is really the best!

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Amazing lectures
2.0
2.0
EXISTENTIALISM
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Nov 4, 2024

You are mainly graded on attendance and participation, leading everyone to ask very dull questions for the sake of keeping up a grade. Her answers? Just off-topic tangents which leave many students staring at each other in confusion. Assigned 7 small papers, 1 final paper, 10-min presentation, and she forces your engagement rather than earning it.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Graded by few things
4.0
3.0
PHI102
Grade: B+
Jan 5, 2025
Would take again

Professor Castelao-Lawless is engaging, but her strict policies and tough grading can make the class challenging. Attending lectures is crucial, and using tools like unstuckstudy along with the textbook can help.

5.0
2.0
PHI341
Dec 3, 2025
Would take again

Professor Castelao-Lawless is super nice and friendly. Class is largely based on a short reading and response paragraph. She lectures for a while then opens the floor and most everybody shares something they took from the reading. Very open, low-stakes discussion and assignments. Would highly recommend.

Participation matters
Inspirational
Caring
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 30 grades
Most common grades:
A (13)
B+ (5)
B (4)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(6)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(8)
Based on 34 reported grades
A: 13
B+: 5
B: 4
A-: 3
Common Tags
Get ready to read (14)
Participation matters (11)
Tough Grader (10)
Lecture heavy (8)
Skip class? You won't pass. (7)
Caring (7)
Amazing lectures (6)
Graded by few things (5)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.69 avg change
Dec
Apr
Feb
Nov
Jan
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHI314

5.0

(1)

PHI341

4.7

(3)

PHI201

4.5

(2)

PHI101

4.2

(6)

PHI102SW

4.0

(1)
+13 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PSI102

5.0

PHI102SW

4.0

HSC20102

4.0

ETHICS102

3.8

102

3.5

Similar Professors