3.7

Terrence Deacon

Anthropology - University of California Berkeley

3.7
Quality
3.1
Difficulty
65%
Would Retake
87
Reviews
3.7
Quality
3.1
Difficulty
3.7
Helpful
3.8
Clarity

65%

Would Retake

87

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
87 total ratings

5

29

4

28

3

16

2

13

1

1

What Students Say

He is accessible at office hours if you try hard

ANTH111 - 5.0 rating

Midterm & final are mostly Big Idea based

ANTHRO107 - 4.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

35%

Textbook Required

28%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 23 grades
Most common grades:
A- (7)
B+ (6)
A+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(3)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(13)
Based on 28 reported grades
A-: 7
B+: 6
A+: 5
Not sure yet: 4
Common Tags
Respected (14)
Lecture heavy (11)
Graded by few things (10)
Test heavy (7)
Amazing lectures (5)
Inspirational (4)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (4)
Skip class? You won't pass. (4)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.27 avg change
Jan
Feb
Jun
Aug
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ANTHRO196

5.0

(1)

ANTHR2

5.0

(1)

ANTH111

4.9

(8)

ANTHRO111

4.7

(3)

ANTHR1

4.7

(3)
+11 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ANTH196

5.0

ANTHR111

4.7

ANTH107

4.5

ANTHROPOLOGY1

4.0

ANTHRO112

4.0

Reviews (86)
5.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
Nov 6, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Nov 10, 2003

No Comments

3.0
4.0
ANTHRO1
Nov 25, 2003

Lectures are long and sometimes boring. Quizzes are given a week in adavnce and lectures notes are posted online which is a plus. Midterm sucked but the class is okay.

2.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Dec 11, 2003

No Comments

4.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Dec 12, 2003

Rambles sometimes in lecture, and there is a lot of material. Weekly quizzes keep you up to date.

3.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
Apr 28, 2004

The midterm was pretty easy. Talks about ALOT of stuff in lecture, but not all of it actually makes it to the test. Rambles alot.

2.0
1.0
ANTHRO1
Jul 16, 2004

Was exceedingly boring and was unwilling to reschedule a quiz for the Jewish high holidays...what a dick.

5.0
1.0
ANTHRO1
Aug 22, 2004

lectures can be repetitive, but lectures, blacklightning notes, and quizzes give you all you need to know to do well in the class. I found his lectures interesting, didn't see too many people sleeping

4.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
Oct 21, 2004

Buy BlackLightning notes! They are practically lecture transcriptions and are very helpful. It was a very interesting subject matter.

2.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Nov 7, 2004

Lectures were extremely boring. Midterm was really easy but then to make up for it, the final was extremely hard.

2.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Nov 14, 2004

Very boring lectures, I don't even bother going anymore. I read only blacklightning notes and studied off quizzes and still got B+ on the midterm. He looks like the type of person who got beat up a lot in grade school.

5.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
Dec 7, 2004

I love this class- his lectures are fun and easy to understand and the midterm was really easy, provided that you studied.

5.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
Dec 12, 2004

His class is aided by the use of pictures/videos. The material for the class is relatively easy and presented in a clear way with many examples and he tied everything together well. Get BlackLightning b/c all quizzes/midterms only test the lecture material. In fact don't even buy the books

5.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
Dec 13, 2004

the class was very interesting..sometimes the lectures were brutal, but who doesn't need a good nap? midterm/quizzes were straight from the lecture notes. we'll see how the midterm goes. PS i got a lot of knitting done in his class.

2.0
5.0
ANTHRO1
Jan 12, 2005

This man is CRAZY, he rambles about a lot of things, and most of it is irrelevant to the exams. Do the readings, watch some of his slides, and read black lightning notes. HARD class

3.0
4.0
ANTHRO1
Jan 13, 2005

It helps to have the quiz notes and midterm from which to study.

4.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
Mar 30, 2005

The subject matter was decently interesting. The tests can be kinda picky, but if you know anyone who took the class, get their old tests!!! He repeats a lot of the questions on his exams - both for midterms and the final! Also black lightning is a must; i got an A and never went to class.

3.0
4.0
ANTHROPOLOGY1
Apr 27, 2005

The subject is rather dull, a lot of material to memorize, and his lectures come a lot from the books. I definitly reccomend black lightning for the class, and section is REALLY important!

4.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
May 5, 2005

Very interesting class! Great lecturer, he modulates his voice very well unlike a lot of the other monotune profs I've had. I love his little clips too. Seems very interested and enthusiastic about the subject(esp. brain and language). A lot of memorization though.

4.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
May 16, 2005

Deacon is a great lecturer, and makes the material really interesting. His subject may not be the most interesting in the world, but he does a lot better job of it than Professor Agarwal. If you're going to take Anthro 1, take it from Deacon!

5.0
4.0
ANTHRO111
Jun 1, 2005

It was a tough course, but not impossible. Lectures were crucial, but reading was necessary to cement everything into place. If you just want a grade, go to lecture. If you want to really understand the world, take the time to learn from him. It's worth the journey. Also, check out the follow on course, Anthro 112.

2.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Jun 20, 2005

terrible class. you just memorize the lectures. if u waste time trying to understand the material it takes energy from memorizing mundane details that are going to be on the exams.

3.0
3.0
ANTHROPOLOGY
Aug 31, 2005

Hella boring ass class...monkey and ape section was the only interesting thing

2.0
4.0
ANTHRO112
Apr 11, 2006

He might be easier in Anthro 1, but in more specialized classes he's near impossible. Every little detail he mentions is fair game for exams, but most of this random information isn't in the texts. Not only do you have to attend every class, but you pretty much have to have a complete transcript of his lecture. Nice guy, but not a great lecturer.

4.0
3.0
ANTHRO111
Apr 24, 2006

This class was one of the most interesting classes I have ever taken. Deacon is funny and engaging. The tests are multiple choice that come from lecture. Anything you don't understand you can suppliment with the readings. You can't do well without coming to class.

5.0
3.0
ANTHRO196
May 8, 2006

I took this class for a req, but ended up loving every second. He weeded out 3/4 of the class by the end of the semester and it was QUALITY. Discussions, good readings, pure joy. He promised me a letter of rec almost a year ago and had not responded to my emails. eeks. Bad at timely email responses, but when you get his time its well worth it!!!

5.0
3.0
ANTHRO111
Jul 29, 2006

Deacon Rocks

5.0
3.0
ANTH111
Aug 23, 2006

Okay, dude's got some problems but generally his lectures are really interesting and lively - he does TRY to be comedic. Exams are mult choice but surprisingly difficult/tricky. 1st midterm was like reciting Darwin's Origin word for word. Always behind on the syllabus. Very helpful outside of class, recommends add'tnl readings, namely his own book

4.0
4.0
ANTHR112
Aug 30, 2006

This class was difficult but totally worth it! There is a lot of science involved, so for those of your only interested in the socio-cult side of anthro, this is not the UD bio req you should take. Tests are hard, but he is really generous in the grading and really helpful in office hours. Take the class if you into bio anthro, neuroscience!

4.0
5.0
ANTH196
Jan 5, 2007

196 was a very challenging class, long/difficult readings, but still one of the best classes I've taken at Cal. Tough as hell, but really rewarding. Intimate class (12 people?), dont miss class, READ or you'll feel stupid. Deacon's a supergenius, but at least tries to simplify things at office hours. Awesome if youre really into evo theory or IB/MC

5.0
5.0
ANTH111
Jan 15, 2007

This prof really is a supergenius, but makes a genuine effort to explain things well. Lots of reading - focus on the posted readings, then move to the books if you can. Tests are really tricky, and your grade is based on them. Really fascinating material in lectures, which you have to attend to keep up with the class.

5.0
3.0
ANTH111
Jan 17, 2007

Deacon is one of the most brilliant professors I have encountered at Cal. The class was challenging but absolutely fascinating.

5.0
3.0
ANTH111
Jan 19, 2007

Really great lecturer. I would recommend this class to anyone interested in evolution and the "evolution of evolution." It's so great to have professors who are clearly at or near the top in their field. Prof. Deacon is definately in that category. He's extremely approachable and very available. His reader Julie Hui is also very good!

2.0
5.0
ANTHR111
Oct 1, 2007

Takes a topic that should be interesting and manages to put you to sleep with it. Super boring. Ridiculous amount of reading.

3.0
4.0
ANTHR111
Jan 3, 2008

class graded by 2 midterms and a final. assigned lots of reading but ok not to do it all. very important to attend class and take notes. fast and in depth, he's extremely knowledgeable and expects a lot but you learn a lot

4.0
5.0
ANTHR111
Jan 22, 2008

Professor Deacon is a genius. It is clear that he is very passionate about what he teaches. I took two of his classes (anthro 1 and anthro 111), and both were extremely challenging, but the material was so interesting.

5.0
3.0
ANTH1
Apr 20, 2008

Deacon is very knowledgeable and enthusiastic about the subject. Sooo adorable too! Some of the reading can be tedious, and you don't have to do all of them; use your judgment. The midterm's not so bad as long as you're a decent student (meaning you attend lecture and actually pay attention). I recommend Deacon.

4.0
3.0
ANTHR1
Jul 22, 2008

Class is definitely interesting, and I wouldn't recommend skipping class, even though he posts the lecture slides online. Shows some cool videos about monkeys and slugs. Tests are manageable and curved, and based mostly on lectures. I stopped reading after the first midterm. Go to class and you should do fine.

5.0
1.0
ANTHR2
May 19, 2009

Awesome teacher, very passionate about his work. Great lectures with lots of funny videos and pictures. You don't need to read a single page from the text book and can still get an easy A because the lectures are so comprehensible and interesting.

5.0
1.0
ANTHR1
May 25, 2009

Easy A with a reasonable amount of studying, especially if you have a biology background. Never opened the textbook because his lectures are really, really good.

5.0
3.0
ANTHR1
May 30, 2009

Great lecturer, very passionate about the subject. Showed hilarious nature videos in almost every class and had clear, entertaining examples for every concept. Tests are totally based on lecture, I barely opened the books and got an A so don't waste your time.

5.0
3.0
ANTH111
Jun 11, 2009

This was an incredible course - definitely one of my favorites. He's very knowledgeable about the subject matter and it shows. I wouldn't say the class is difficult if you're making an effort but certainly not one you can ignore and hope for the best. Lectures are interesting, passionate and relevant.

4.0
4.0
ANTH111
May 11, 2010

Brilliant man. Tricky tests. Interesting material. Occasional humor makes his lectures less monotonous. My only suggestion is that he demand more rigor and imagination from his students, as opposed to just making them do multiple choice and identification.

3.0
5.0
ANTH107
Mar 13, 2012

For the rest of my life, I will consider myself extremely fortunate to have learned under Professor Deacon. For those of you who don't know, this guy is world renown in this field. HE IS RENOWN FOR BEING A SUPERGENIUS, NOT FOR BEING EASY. Hardest class I've ever taken, but worth it when considering how well-respected he is.

4.0
2.0
ANTHR001
Jul 13, 2012

Great professor. He gives you weekly quizzes that are very helpful in preparing you for the midterms and final. He does podcast so that is also a plus but just make sure you still go to class. If you're on top of things, this class won't be hard

4.0
1.0
ANTH1
Jul 20, 2012

This was an interesting, easygoing class. All lectures are posted online with powerpoints, almost all test material came from quiz study guides

4.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
May 31, 2013

Professor Deacon is a clear lecturer and helpful outside of class. His lectures can be a little monotonous at times but he makes it fun with little videos throughout the class. I'd suggest going to class even though he podcasts everything. Overall, I'd say it's an interesting, enjoyable course and a great way to fulfill your bio breadth.

5.0
1.0
ANTHRO1
Jan 6, 2014

Deacon is a really great professor. Anth 1 was really fun and more interesting than I was expecting. Shows great clips, and tests are easy (straight from lecture slides, always multiple choice or short answer.) Take him if you get the chance and are interested in anthro/evolution/primates!

4.0
4.0
ANTH107
Grade: A
Dec 3, 2014

This is an amazing class, if you're not afraid of some hard science in your anthro. My adviser told me that if I got a B I should pat myself on the back because this is one of the hardest anthro classes here. But he gives you the curve at the mid-term so you know quickly how you're doing, and he's very willing to help if you ask.

5.0
4.0
ANTHRO107
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 23, 2014

This is the kind of teacher I expected when I came to Cal. So great. He has everything. Funny, kind, excited, knowledgeable, great lectures, really made me want to come to class. You learn a lot.

5.0
4.0
ANTHRO107
Grade: A-
Mar 19, 2015

Professor Deacon is the reason I got into Bio Anthropology at Cal. He is immensely helpful and informative during office hours, and he is a dynamic, enthusiastic lecturer. His lectures can be a little intimidating because there is so much information, but he presents it in a comprehensive way. His exams are tough, but doable if you work hard.

4.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
May 24, 2015

Prof. Deacon was an amazing lecturer, if you paid attention. It's easy to lose focus because there are no participation points. Do not lose focus. Tests are based entirely off of lecture material. An easy A if you can pay attention.

5.0
1.0
ANTHRO1
Jun 2, 2015

Professor Deacon really knows his stuff but he talks forever. First class I have ever fallen asleep in. Readings are not necessary as all test questions are from lecture slides and practice quizzes.

4.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
Grade: A-
Jun 6, 2015

Prof. Deacon explains the concepts clearly, although he does rant on certain topics. He shows funny, interesting videos throughout lecture. The course is easy, GSI not really needed. We had quizzes at the beginning of our discussion. Prof. Deacon was nice enough to give us the questions on the quizzes a week beforehand. Amazing class, do take!

3.0
3.0
ANTHR112
Grade: A-
Jan 25, 2016

He can sometimes go a bit fast but you get used to it. Some of the information in the slides was irrelevant or overcomplicated.

5.0
4.0
ANTH111
Grade: B+
Jun 25, 2016
Would take again

Deacon inspired me to chart a unique career using evolutionary biology and anthropology in applied fields. An academic heavyweight, he is also not afraid to mentor outside the department and shines his brilliance your way if you ask the right questions, synthesizing across interdisciplinary lines. He is accessible at office hours if you try hard.

5.0
2.0
ANTH111
Grade: A+
Jul 30, 2016
Would take again

Class isn't mandatory - his exams are very straightforward if you study just the lecture slides. However, Prof. Deacon is internationally known in his field, so lectures truly are a treat (many elderly people go to lecture just to listen!). Fascinating material, and an insightful, reasonable person - would love to take another class from him.

4.0
3.0
ANTHRO107
Grade: B+
Jan 3, 2017
Would take again

Don't rely too much on lecture videos online -- the course captures on bCourses were really unreliable, and often had no audio (I realized this too late the week before the exam -- be careful!). Midterm & final are mostly Big Idea based. He goes off on tangents involving little details, but you should extrapolate those to the bigger concepts!

Inspirational
TEST HEAVY
Amazing lectures
4.0
4.0
ANTH1
May 10, 2017
Would take again

Very engaging. Made materials interesting through lecture slide (Pics, Vids). Much tougher class than originally thought. Seems like it could be an upper div bio class. Memorize and you'll probably get an A. SIde note, my own exp with all Anthro GSI seem to be hit or miss. Eccentric or bland no in between. Shop around it can make a significant

Hilarious
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
ANTH1
Jul 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

A bit boring in lectures, even though the material was interesting. The quizzes are easy as long as you go to lectures and prepare. Did not need the textbook.

Respected
2.0
5.0
ANTH107
Jan 21, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He is such an expert in his field that he has no clue how to teach to people that have no idea how the brain works. Test questions are pulled from the tiniest details of lecture slides (which he calls "big picture") and the lecture slides usually consist of complicated, blurry diagrams. DO NOT TAKE ANTH 107 UNLESS YOU HAVE A BIO/COGSCI BACKGROUND

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
4.0
ANTHRO1
Grade: A-
May 6, 2018
Would take again

Terry is kind of a meme, but he's also a Harvard grad + professor so he's very well-respected. He has (way too much) info in his slides, but everything for the tests are on there, so it's relatively straightforward. Weekly quizzes are a pain but I was able to study the day of and do well on most of them. Overall ok as long as you don't fall behind.

LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
3.0
ANTH1
Grade: A+
Jun 9, 2018
Would take again

Deacon is amazing. I felt he went a little too in depth for an intro class at times but he was an incredibly interesting lecturer. He's also hella famous in the anthro world which is super cool and its crazy that he actually teaches an intro class considering his status. Great professor, incredibly knowledgable and a riveting speaker

Respected
Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
4.0
ANTH107
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 17, 2018
Would take again

This is what you come to Berkeley for. Challamging. Brilliant. Important work. Yet extremely approachable.

Respected
Inspirational
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
4.0
4.0
ANTHRO107
Grade: B+
Dec 19, 2018
Would take again

Great professor. Hard as hell. Very difficult to know what was going to be on exam. Could be any damn slide. But he was extremely approachable and the GSIs were amazing! Extremely interesting material and Im happy to challenge myself in a course like this. Fair grader and is lenient with a curve. Glad I took it.

Respected
Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
2.0
ANTHRO107
Grade: A
Dec 21, 2018
Would take again

This was the easiest cog sci elective I've taken. I studied for a couple of days before each exam and got an A (essentially, watched the lectures at 2x). The content is very straightforward but prepare to know the small details from Deacon's own research. Overall, one of the easiest, yet still interesting, classes I took in college.

Clear grading criteria
TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
ANTH1
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 14, 2019
Would take again

Amazing lecturer. He keeps you engaged throughout the class and, presuming you pay attention, you will learn a lot. Very funny and charismatic as well.

Respected
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
3.0
2.0
ANTHRO1
May 4, 2019
Would take again

so knowledgable, but for some reason his voice put me to sleep everyday. not the typical monotone you would think of, but still monotone. midterm and final were harder than i expected, but still manageable. quizzes every week and he puts the slides online

Lecture heavy
4.0
2.0
ANTH1
May 15, 2019
Would take again

Lecture attendance isn't mandatory and slides are posted after. WEEKLY QUIZZES MATTER. Exams aren't as in depth as lecture content--you'll be fine memorizing the slides and quizzes. No graded labs, papers, etc! Also great to be able to hear about Deacon's research and his legacy in the field :) class grade is curved at the end but reasonable

Respected
Test heavy
4.0
1.0
ANTHRO1
May 26, 2019
Would take again

Very passionate about humans and biological evolution but his lectures were indeed very boring, I would fall asleep in them. He posts the lecture slides on bCourses as well as Course Captures so even if you don't show up to lecture, you will be fine. Weekly quizzes posted on bCourses and are taken during Discussion.

Respected
Graded by few things
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
ANTH107
Grade: B
Dec 21, 2019
Would take again

Professor Deacon is a wonderful lecturer, just preferably don't take his lectures at 8 am, it makes it hard to stay awake in a dark auditorium. He loves his material and can really speak to his research. His tests are notoriously hard but he does curve and the GSIs are a great resource for study help.

Respected
Graded by few things
Test heavy
5.0
4.0
ANTH1
Grade: A+
Oct 22, 2020
Would take again

Years later I still remember so much from this class. I probably way over-studied, but knowing the material has been really applicable to my other classes.

Amazing lectures
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
ANTH1
Dec 2, 2021
Wouldn't take again

The course material is very interesting, you can tell professor Deacon is very passionate about the subject and is very knowledgeable. However, the class structure is very bland, and especially through zoom, it was really hard to focus. There are weekly quizzes and a midterm and final. A lot of memorization.

Test heavy
4.0
3.0
ANTH1
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 2, 2021
Would take again

Though everything get tested is on the PPT shared after class, PPT is hard to read without explanations given in class. So even participation isn't mandatory, going to lectures help. Lots of exam questions taken directly from weekly quiz. Readings optional. The course is inspiring and life-changing in all, I recommend as a must for Berkeley student

Inspirational
Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Dec 10, 2021
Wouldn't take again

as a non STEM major, i found this course to be extremely boring. deacon moves pretty fast through the material and provides a lot of examples, so it's easy to get lost. lectures are dense and he's not the most interesting ngl. textbook is not necessary, but there are weekly quizzes. it's easy to pass if you study tbh.

Graded by few things
Test heavy
Lecture heavy
4.0
4.0
ANTH1
Grade: B+
Dec 13, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Deacon knows what he's talking about but lectures were boring and hard to follow along at times. He's very advanced to be teaching an intro class. The entire grade is made up of three sections: weekly quizzes (which aren't too bad as long as you study a couple days in advance), midterm, and final. Maybe I'm just not passionate about anthro..

Respected
Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
ANTHRO1
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 18, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Lectures are incredibly dense; spoke for the entire 80 minutes straight nearly every lecture so the material is hard to digest during class. He's not very willing to help students out (refuses to record lectures or post slides beforehand). GSIs will be a big help. Exams weren't super hard, but the amount of info to study is overwhelming.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
2.0
3.0
ANTH1
Grade: B-
Dec 18, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Exciting material by such an eminent professor in the field, but intro class isn't his forte. He doesn't post presentations beforehand. It is also hard to take notes or be attentive during lectures as he goes off track. However, you should be fine for any quiz & exam if you revise the weekly questions.

Graded by few things
Respected
Clear grading criteria
2.0
4.0
ANTH1
Grade: A-
Dec 23, 2021
Wouldn't take again

he didnt input a single thing in canvas all semester, tests were based on quizzes but had hard and specific short answer, he didnt record lectures and basically talked every class for 2 hours straight, posted slides, your test is only the midterm + final + weekly quizzes. most people take P/NP because its a hard course. you have to put in work

Respected
Test heavy
Lecture heavy
3.0
4.0
ANTH1
Grade: B
Dec 23, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Terrence is very respected in the field of Anthro. His lectures were pretty boring so it was hard to focus in them especially since they were online. Study for weekly quizzes, because your grade on those matter a lot. Exams are quite difficult, & the questions are very random, so it was hard to know what to study.

Respected
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
ANTH1
Grade: A+
Jan 4, 2022
Wouldn't take again

Lectures are hard to follow, but GSIs are very helpful at clarifying information. Weekly quizzes make up a good chunk of the grade, but the questions are given ahead of time so you can study ahead and find the answers in the slides. Exams contain quiz questions and reworded versions of quiz questions, so they are really the best study guide.

Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
ANTH1
Grade: A+
Feb 27, 2022
Would take again

I went into Anthro1 with zero knowledge of the subject and left with a huge interest in the material and find myself applying it to my everyday life. I recommend this class to everyone. ALWAYS do the weekly quiz questions ahead of time and ask him questions about the material and his research! He is great at clearly explaining complicated concepts.

Respected
Graded by few things
Amazing lectures
3.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Grade: A-
Jun 19, 2022
Would take again

Lectures were a little slow paced and boring. Weekly quizzes (make sure you study!). Quiz and test questions come from lectures, so make sure you pay attention to all the details mentioned.

4.0
5.0
ANTH107
Grade: A-
Aug 26, 2022
Would take again

Great instructor. 107 was a great class and if you put in the work and study study study you'll do just fine !

Respected
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
4.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Grade: B+
Dec 29, 2022
Would take again

Prof. Deacon is very intelligent and usually was able to teach the info very well. His lectures weren't the most engaging and could get a little boring, but I was able to keep up by studying for the weekly quizzes.

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
2.0
3.0
ANTHRO1
Grade: B+
Jan 24, 2023

The lectures were long and boring. It was a bit difficult to pay attention during lectures. Only graded by weekly quizzes, midterm, and final.

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

35%

Textbook Required

28%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 23 grades
Most common grades:
A- (7)
B+ (6)
A+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(3)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(13)
Based on 28 reported grades
A-: 7
B+: 6
A+: 5
Not sure yet: 4
Common Tags
Respected (14)
Lecture heavy (11)
Graded by few things (10)
Test heavy (7)
Amazing lectures (5)
Inspirational (4)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (4)
Skip class? You won't pass. (4)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.27 avg change
Jan
Feb
Jun
Aug
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ANTHRO196

5.0

(1)

ANTHR2

5.0

(1)

ANTH111

4.9

(8)

ANTHRO111

4.7

(3)

ANTHR1

4.7

(3)
+11 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ANTH196

5.0

ANTHR111

4.7

ANTH107

4.5

ANTHROPOLOGY1

4.0

ANTHRO112

4.0

Similar Professors