3.5

Thomas Bradley Richards

Philosophy - Toronto Metropolitan University

3.5
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
58%
Would Retake
88
Reviews
3.5
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
3.6
Helpful
3.5
Clarity

58%

Would Retake

88

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

33

4

23

3

7

2

11

1

14

What Students Say

The most boring class and professor ever

PHL214 - 1.0 rating

no feedback, messy lecture notes and slides

CPHL606 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

44%

Textbook Required

34%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 43 grades
Most common grades:
A (17)
A- (11)
Not sure yet (9)
Grade Distribution
A(18)B(7)C(2)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(16)
Based on 53 reported grades
A: 17
A-: 11
Not sure yet: 9
B: 7
Common Tags
Participation matters (21)
Get ready to read (19)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (12)
Gives good feedback (12)
Respected (12)
GROUP PROJECTS (8)
Skip class? You won't pass. (8)
Caring (7)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.93 avg change
May
Dec
Dec
Jul
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHL710

5.0

(1)

PHL504

5.0

(1)

cphl611

5.0

(1)

cphl504

5.0

(1)

PHL430

5.0

(1)
+7 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHL522

3.2

PHL504

3.0

cphl504

3.0

PHL430

3.0

PHL201

2.8

Reviews (88)
5.0
3.0
CPHL606
Oct 2, 2013

So awesome, funny and really interesting. HOT

4.0
1.0
CPHL606
Jan 9, 2014

Super laid back and easy going. He tends to drone off during lectures but it's out of interest. He's also kind of awkward, but it's funny awkward. Easy course. Attendance isn't absolutely mandatory but it's worthwhile going to, class discussions can be pretty funny. Worth taking overall. Great prof.

5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: B+
Jan 20, 2014

Awesome Prof. Highly recommended, just take his class- you won't be disappointed.

5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: B+
Jan 20, 2014

Awesome Prof. Don't pass the chance to take a PHL course with him- you won't be disappointed!

5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: B+
Jan 20, 2014

Awesome Prof.- very passionate about subject matter and it shows! If you get a class with him or have the chance to- simply take it, you won't regret it!

5.0
2.0
PHL710
Grade: A
Jan 20, 2014

Great professor! Take any of his classes if you can. The content of this course is kind of difficult, but he breaks down the important arguments well. Gives exam questions before the exams and is a fair marker on the essay. Overall, one of the best professors I've had.

5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: A-
Feb 22, 2015

Amazing Professor. I had him at Ryerson for Philosophy of Love & Sex. Even though classes ended late on Thursday nights, I still really enjoyed going and participating. The material does get a little tricky at times, but he is very good if you ask for extra help. One of my favourite classes & professors in 4 years at Ryerson.

5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Feb 22, 2015

Great professor!, makes the class so much fun and he's very helpful and makes this class an ease to understand

3.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: A
Feb 23, 2015

Professor Thomas made things more interesting, the course was pretty dry. He was a fair marker, but for participation marks make sure he knows your name and more importantly your face in order to get the highest mark. Participation is 10% of your mark.

4.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: A
Feb 23, 2015

Really enjoyable class. Explains material well--some of the perspectives and content discussed will remain with me for a long time. For group presentationsassignments, there is no marking rubric, so it's difficult to know exactly what he expects and there isn't any feedback. However, it's still easy to do well in class.

5.0
1.0
PHL606
Feb 23, 2015

Great prof, great marker, however for those who do not like to study long... go to lectures and get involved or listen good if you can and you will pop out with a B no problem. Group project was nice. textbook not needed

4.0
2.0
CPHL606
Feb 25, 2015

Brad combined humorous dialogue while teaching which was refreshing.

5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: B
Aug 6, 2015

This was probably one of the best classes I have taken in my four years at ryerson. Brad is a perfect example of how a university professor should be. Brad is engaging, fun and challenges you to think. Yet, he is very smart and knowledgeable. If i could, I would instantly enroll in another class that has Brad as a professor

5.0
1.0
CPHL606
Aug 10, 2015

Bradley Richards is an absolutely terrific professor. His teaching style is very effective & casual. He is able to break down even the most difficult concepts effectively and clearly to students. His lectures are interactive & really engaging. I came to each class excited and ready to learn. This class really changes your perspective on the world!

5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: B
Nov 20, 2015

I usually hate liberal studies classes, but Dr. Richards philosophy class was highly interesting. His classes were never boring and very engaging. His lecture approach is different from other professors as it is more of a conversation rather than him teaching. I would highly recommend this class to anyone in need of an upper liberal.

5.0
1.0
CPHL606
Dec 22, 2015

Great Prof, very fun and engaging course. Would definitely take another class with him!

3.0
1.0
CPHL606
Grade: B
Dec 22, 2015

Class was pretty good, interesting topics and discussions, essay was only 750 words, exam questions were given prior to exam, and presentation was marked pretty easy, overall great class, and funny guy. Would take another class with him.

4.0
3.0
PHL606
Grade: A-
Dec 22, 2015

Actually engages in discussion that expands your own philosophical development. Tries to challenging your thinking and reasoning which can be confusing. Respects others opinions and is open to understand other people's reasoning.

4.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: A-
Dec 22, 2015

Richards is a very passionate teacher who really makes the class fun. Very helpful and approachable. There are no rubrics which made it difficult to understand what he expected, but when asked he would clarify again and again. Would definitely take another course with him if possible. 1 Essay, 1Group Presentation, 1Final. 3textbooks.

4.0
3.0
CPHL606
Dec 23, 2015

Overall A great class. I would recommend it.

4.0
2.0
CPHL606
Dec 27, 2015

I thought Professor Richards created a fun, teachable, and interesting learning experience. He is laid-back, has a good sense of humor, and makes Philosophy (a very tough subject at times) fun. He encourages participation which I think is very important and does not judge opinions. Genuine good guy, I recommend any who are interested in Philosophy.

5.0
3.0
PHL365
Grade: A-
Jan 19, 2017
Would take again

Brad was such a cool guy!! definitely enjoyed his classes!

Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHL365
Jan 23, 2017
Would take again

Super nice guy! Take his class!

Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
GROUP PROJECTS
4.0
3.0
PHL365
Grade: B
Jan 28, 2017
Would take again

Awesome lectures, gets the class involved and makes it easier to learn!!

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
2.0
3.0
PHL201
Mar 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Richards is a nice prof, that I can say. He is indeed chill and laid back. However, he often takes this laxness way too far, to the point that I don't feel he comes to his own classes prepared. He frequently reads off his slides, talks in a monotone and quiet voice, and his D2L site is very disorganized. He also gets distracted easily in class.

1.0
1.0
PHL214
Grade: B
Mar 6, 2017
Wouldn't take again

The most boring class and professor ever. Very monotone and quiet. Also is too relaxed and reads off the powerpoint. Just reads his slides and gets notes from it and you'll pass. Also expects participation and group projects. Honestly, this class is a waste of time with this professor.

Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
GROUP PROJECTS
5.0
2.0
PHL201
Mar 28, 2017
Would take again

Great guy, makes the content interesting, relaxed environment.

Clear grading criteria
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
1.0
1.0
PHL214
Grade: A
Apr 6, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Professor's an absolute mess. Too chill, spends 2 hours on lecture that can be done in half an hour. Broken participation system, tests are easy but you still gotta go to class to earn a big chunk of your marks. Unprepared - first exam, man brought insufficient copies of the test for everyone. Still easy marks, if youre willing to be bored.

Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
GROUP PROJECTS
5.0
2.0
PHL201
Grade: A-
Apr 7, 2017
Would take again

He's a really fair grader!

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Caring
5.0
4.0
CPHL606
Apr 7, 2017
Would take again

Very organised and approachable Always made sure that the class understood the lecture. Was available to answer questions after the class too. I took the class for self learning it was not a degree requirement. I definitely will take another class too

Gives good feedback
Respected
Skip class? You won't pass.
4.0
3.0
PHL201
Apr 7, 2017
Would take again

Very interest material taught in class. Very thorough and the prof seemed pretty knowable about all concepts covered in class.

1.0
3.0
CPHL606
Grade: B
Apr 7, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Boring class, NOT ORGANIZED, WOULD NOT TAKE THIS AGAIN. DO Yourself a favor and avoid

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
2.0
PHL201
Apr 9, 2017
Would take again

Good guy, easy marker tries his best to connect course themes to things in the real world.

Respected
Hilarious
GROUP PROJECTS
1.0
5.0
PHL201
Grade: A
Apr 11, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Don't even take him, not a good lecture giver and pointless class when taught by him. Worst professor in my university career. Would not recommend.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
GROUP PROJECTS
5.0
1.0
PHL201
Grade: B+
Apr 14, 2017
Would take again

Bradley is a super cool guy and the philosophy course that he taught was super laid back and it was easy to get good marks in that class. He's a funny guy and he's HOT

Respected
Inspirational
TEST HEAVY
5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: A-
Apr 14, 2017
Would take again

Great guy, very funny and makes you understand the material. Would definitely take another class with him!

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
Amazing lectures
3.0
2.0
PHL201
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 18, 2017
Would take again

He's an intelligent person and can be funny but he's also very monotone and seems unprepared/uninterested sometimes. The class is boring if students don't participate especially since his calm voice is perfect to fall asleep to . The course itself was interesting and he made it interesting with the debates. His exam review was very helpful as well

Hilarious
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
2.0
3.0
CPHL606
Apr 18, 2017
Wouldn't take again

really vague, not helpful, barely any feedback, does not give any 80's. nothing makes sense in the way he grades or teaches.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
4.0
3.0
CPHL606
Apr 19, 2017
Would take again

He's a super chill professor and extremely straight forward with assignments. When it came to the content of the course he knew what he was talking about and by the end of the semester he wasn't even using the slides. It's was less of a lecture and more of a conversation, making sure we all understood. It's been my favourite elective to date.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
1.0
CPHL606
Apr 20, 2017
Wouldn't take again

no feedback, messy lecture notes and slides. all over the place. disorganized. uploads grades VERY SLOWLY. talks about random subjects, not sure what the point of course was?

Participation matters
GROUP PROJECTS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
CPHL606
Apr 20, 2017
Would take again

Dr. Richards really knows his stuff about philosophy and goes over the assigned readings during class which is very helpful. It's important to take notes as you might have to write journals based on the classes. He gives you many opportunities to do well. One good tip is to make sure to come to the first class! Do not skip his classes.

Gives good feedback
Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
4.0
3.0
PHL201
Apr 20, 2017
Would take again

Solid class. Not the most exciting lecturer.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
GROUP PROJECTS
5.0
3.0
PHL201
Apr 20, 2017
Would take again

Very good course if you have always been interested in philosophy but need help knowing how to situate yourself before embarking on studying that field; and also great for general knowledge. Not overly demanding course, but it is important to be engaged. Free thinking/speaking is accepted there.

4.0
1.0
PHL606
Grade: B+
Apr 22, 2017
Would take again

Took this class as an easy upper liberal and enjoyed it a lot! He likes to discuss material in depth as well as giving good examples! Pay attention in class and make sure to write some notes in order to finish journals! Amazing teacher with a chill personality!

Respected
Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Apr 23, 2017
Would take again

teaches very interesting concepts and encourages discussion. this course is what you make of it. if you're interested in philosophy, this is a good place to explore that thinking. if you're taking the course because you need a credit, it's a pretty straightforward course and there is only 1 main essay, 4 short "journals", 1 exam

Respected
Participation matters
GROUP PROJECTS
5.0
1.0
PHL214
Grade: A
Apr 28, 2017
Would take again

Professor Richards is laid back and very kind. This course is simple as long as you come to class and participate. The only downside is that he doesn't allow you to see your midterms, but he does take up the harder questions in his exam review sessions.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
PHL214
May 4, 2017
Would take again

Really nice Professor! He is very understanding, well informed on the material and willing to go over content during office hours.

Respected
Participation matters
Caring
4.0
5.0
PHL214
Grade: C+
May 9, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Richards is a good teacher however this course is not for everyone. This course is based around concepts and if you don't understand the concepts then the midterm and final will be hard. The textbook does not help and just makes things harder.

Gives good feedback
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
4.0
PHL214
May 14, 2017
Would take again

PHL214 itself was kinda hard but this prof tried his hardest to explain concepts to us. He is a little laid back and expects dialogue in class (understandable). One thing I missed out on was asking for help, clarify concepts for critical thinking because sometimes you can get them reversed. Wish he would let us see where we went wrong on tests.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
2.0
4.0
PHL365
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 11, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Textbooks were expensive and BARELY used, Lectures were droning and disorganized, would get off topic and struggled to explain key concepts. Easy Marker? but it takes forever to get grades back. Would not take again He's kinda hot tho in that like, Draco Malfoys dad kinda way.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
2.0
4.0
PHL365
Dec 27, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He is very unorganized in every way. Lectures go on off track a lot, seems very uninterested being there, and never responds to emails. Textbooks are expensive and hard to read through. Only 5 assignments during whole semester, but each are challenging. Course material on its own is interesting and otherwise good, just not with this prof.

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
2.0
PHL365
Grade: A
Dec 28, 2017
Would take again

Bradley is a laid back kinda guy. He seems like the type that never stresses about anything in life, however I believe that he's able to get the most important concepts of the course into your brain. The course is very interesting and your participation is graded. He will spoon-feed you to succeed in his course with hints about the essay and final

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
2.0
3.0
PHL606
Jan 29, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This guy is so extremely un organized. He really does nothing and doesn't say much in class either... the amount of anxiety his disorganization gives me.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
1.0
PHL365
Jan 30, 2018
Would take again

One of the best profs I've had!! Very nice and respectful, has clear grading criteria and is an easy marker. Also gives great feedback!!

Gives good feedback
Respected
Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
PHL606
Grade: A-
Apr 21, 2018
Would take again

awesome class, awesome prof. he talks a bit slow and doesnt really post slides up online so its good to have a friend in class. hes straightforward with assignments and is an easy marker, and the topics he mentions in class are really interesting.

Participation matters
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
2.0
CPHL606
Grade: B
Jun 28, 2018
Would take again

His lectures are sometimes very difficult to understand only because the material itself is dense but he tries to answer all questions as simply as possible. He grades clearly and easily and I would definitely recommend him.

Respected
Participation matters
Inspirational
1.0
3.0
PHL214
Grade: C
Dec 19, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Be prepared to be in a class with mainly engineers. Most of the work is within groups yet the only grades you get are based on midterm and final. Really wish we had some other assignments for marks. Classes were boring and painful to get through. Not what I would consider an easy elective. Be prepared.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
3.0
4.0
PHL201
Grade: A-
Dec 22, 2018
Would take again

Good prof. Hard marker, as in every other philosophy class. He is very intelligent as he knows what he is talking about and makes sure he simplifies hard concepts as much as possible. Not a class you should go into expecting an easy A. Must work for it. Takes long to return grades.

Tough Grader
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
PHL201
Grade: A-
Jan 7, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Really funny prof, course content itself is boring but lectures are bearable. Marking is tough and the course is NOT an easy A, you must put in the work and clearly understand the concepts. The philosophy department does not easily grant A's and the marking is quite arbitrary, but if you work hard enough you can attain an 80.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
Hilarious
2.0
4.0
PHL365
Mar 7, 2019
Wouldn't take again

started this course wanting to minor in philosophy. a few weeks later, i hate philosophy and never want to read about it again. he talks in such a monotone voice and has vague descriptions about EVERYTHING. no criteria to follow, bad ppts, still uses the syllabus dates from last semester, and overall really confusing. would not take again. :(

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
So many papers
1.0
4.0
PHL365
Mar 7, 2019
Wouldn't take again

The class is confusing to understand as he just goes on and on about the pictures. He doesn't post the powerpoint online, and shows no interest in teaching the class. he still has the dates from 2017 on the assignments and doesn't post anything properly. you have to be checking announcements. I would drop this class if I had the chance but its late

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
PHL365
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 23, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Please dont take this course. The professor rarely gives back grades and when he does give them back, he offers no feedback or steps for improvement. The professor is unorganized and doesnt respond to emails. The material is hard to understand, textbooks are expensive, and course content doesnt relate to course description.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
3.0
2.0
PHL365
Grade: A
Jun 10, 2019
Would take again

Professor Richards is an easy marker. He wants everyone to do their best and seems interested in what he's teaching but he also is very disorganized. It took him the entire semester to give us some of our marks back and the way that the course is organized seems confused. The content is interesting but the management of it could be better.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Group projects
4.0
3.0
PHL365
Dec 8, 2019
Would take again

Easy marker. Truly wants everyone to do well & succeed. His lectures are very informative - he is really knowledgeable about the topics. With that being said, I found it impossible to pay attentions to his lectures because he is very monotone and quite (very nice to look at though). Exam is really easy. Do all the assignments & you'll do fine.

4.0
2.0
PHL365
Dec 8, 2019
Would take again

Cons - Lectures can be difficult to hear at times. He is very monotone making it easy to zone out. The readings are horrible & take away joy (but that's just academic philosophy readings for ya) Pros - easy marker, wants you to succeed and does what he can to help, very knowledgeable, hot prof, good at explaining/ simplifying difficult concepts

Respected
1.0
3.0
PHL365
Jan 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

his voice is so monotoned and annoying do not take his class. His lectures take forever , you will not enjoy this class with him

Group projects
5.0
1.0
PHL365
Jul 23, 2020
Would take again

As long as you show up, participate and/or take some notes you'll do just fine. He defiantly knows his stuff, and if you can get past his monotoned voice his lectures are enjoyable. If you like philosophy I feel like he' a great teacher, but if youre just in it for an easy credit, it might make his class harder to sit through. He is late sometimes.

Respected
Graded by few things
Group projects
1.0
3.0
PHL365
Oct 11, 2020
Wouldn't take again

An unorganized professor, with little care into his powerpoints and handouts. Our syllabus was posted on the announcement board, instead of an actual Word document, with readings unspecified or uncited properly so students could find them (unless they were his own). His powerpoint slides make no sense, and he posts questions in them with no answer.

Get ready to read
Beware of pop quizzes
1.0
4.0
PHL365
Nov 30, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Horrible professor. Unable to teach. Gives back assignments super late. The lecture is off tangents. Beware of his corrupted quizzes which make no sense what-so-ever. Not related to lecture content that much. Get ready to read a lot. He does not respond to his emails back as well. I don't like phl anymore because of how he teaches, so pointless.

4.0
2.0
PHL365
Grade: A
Dec 8, 2020
Would take again

Very chill prof. If you're thinking of taking PHL365 and you would consider yourself a critical thinker, it's definitely a bird course. A bit boring at times but if you understand the readings you're set.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
3.0
2.0
PHL365
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2020
Would take again

The D2L was a mess, all the content made no sense, and on top of that he didnt give much assistance (took a VERY long time to reply to emails) He was pretty lenient on extensions and was definitely a fair marker so he gets points for that. If youre able to work by yourself id recommend this class.

2.0
2.0
PHL365
Grade: A
Jan 18, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I found the class to be disorganized & attending zoom meetings often just made me more confused than I already was. Lots of readings (you can find all required texts online for free) however, if you just skim through it you can probably get the gist of the content. You can definitely do the bare minimum & still get an A.

Get ready to read
5.0
3.0
PHL504
Grade: A
Sep 3, 2021
Would take again

I had obligations outside of school that really clashed with some of the class deadlines. Brad was really understanding and gave me an extension on a paper ! Really nice guy.

Gives good feedback
Caring
4.0
4.0
PHL365
Grade: A-
Dec 20, 2021
Would take again

Course was largely asynchronous; he provides all the readings which you do in your own time for the 3 quizzes, 10 discussion posts, 1 essay and the final exam. Found him to be chill, easy going and someone who clearly does not know what stress is however, he is a tough marker. Would recommend him for all critical thinkers.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
2.0
3.0
PHL365
Grade: A-
Apr 10, 2022

With 10 discussion posts, 3 quizzes, 1 essay, and 1 final, it isn't hard to do well in this class. Essay was marked fairly but hard and I wouldn't recommend this class if heavy reading isn't your strong suit. Lectures can be skipped though. All content is in the readings. My advice: drop this class if it's not for you after the first two weeks.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
2.0
1.0
PHL802
Grade: A
May 17, 2023

Not very engaged in the content matter and talked in a monotone the entire semester. The grading rationale was questionable. Few assignments, but getting back grades on a reasonable timeline was a struggle (d2l grades for three assignments were not given back until 1-2 weeks after the semester ended (about 50% of your grade).

Participation matters
1.0
5.0
PHL522
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Dec 1, 2023

PLEASE DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A STRONG PHILOSOPHY BACKGROUND. THIS COURSE SHOULDNT BE TAKEN AS AN ELECTIVE. HE SHOULD HE TEACHING SOLELY TO PHILOSOPHY STUDENTS. HIS TA MARKS RIDICULOUSLY HARD AS WELL!

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
PHL522
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 4, 2023

This prof gave very little context or explanation throughout the whole semester. He gives 1-4 readings a week, makes a low-effort "lecture" (essentially just re-stating what is in the reading by reading off his slides with no new info) and that's about it. I do not suggest this class or professor if you have not previously taken philosophy courses

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Lots of homework
5.0
1.0
cphl611
Grade: A+
Dec 23, 2024
Would take again

Excellent professor. Always available for consultation. Easy course. Very knowledgeable. Lots of interesting reading.

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Online Savvy
5.0
3.0
cphl504
Grade: A
Jul 8, 2025
Would take again

Great professor. Knowledgeable. The course itself is interesting but Dr Richards makes it rven ore interesting. He always provides useful help if you assist to his online classes and ask.

Get ready to read
Gives good feedback
Respected
2.0
3.0
PHL522
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 20, 2025

Dr. Richards is knowledgeable and capable of facilitating some really interesting discussions. HOWEVER Expectations were unclear and feedback was non-existent. The material was interesting, but it felt like the course was getting in the way of learning it. I could see him being great for grad student classes, but don't take him in undergrad

Participation matters
4.0
3.0
PHL522
Grade: A
Nov 24, 2025
Would take again

He definitely cares about what he's teaching and wants engaging conversations, which I loved. His instructions for assignments were sometimes confusing, but he's also not very strict, so it balances out. He wants students to know how to develop a philosophical argument, and so he has a strong anti-AI stance (for obvious reasons).

Hilarious
Caring
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
PHL430
Grade: A
Nov 29, 2025
Would take again

The class was really fascinating but you could tell this was the 1st time this class was offered. Prof. Richards was extremely knowledgable in everything AI, so it was great having him give a breadth in scope of information regarding historical and modern AI. There needs some refinement in the syllabus but would take a course with him again.

So many papers
Caring
Accessible outside class
5.0
1.0
PHL522
Grade: A
Dec 8, 2025
Would take again

I love this prof! he's amazing and funny, i loved going to the lectures. 2 quizzes, an essay, and exam, discussion posts and participation. So you can definitely pull yourself up if you mess up. He quizzes and exams were honestly so easy, you don't have to study that much for it. one downside, is he doesn't follow the syblus dates multiple times.

Amazing lectures
Hilarious
Caring
4.0
3.0
PHL522
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 18, 2025

Overall this class was good. Lectures were detailed and there was lots of discussion in class about the subject. It's not too difficult to pass this class since exam and quiz are quite easy if you do the readings and remember them. However, I feel the grades awarded for participating were extremely low compared to the actual participation I did.

Get ready to read
2.0
4.0
PHL522
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 18, 2025

DO NOT fall for the 5.0 ratings on this professor because I did. I have previous experience with philosophy courses and his marking was not it. The textbook was impossible to find online. The format of the quizzes and exam were not really explained during class but they are doable (must be done with a lockdown browser).

Tough grader
1.0
4.0
PHL522
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 18, 2025

Doesn't respond to emails. He said himself that he doesn't check it. Does not mark reasonably. He doesn't take attendance and does not make an effort to know who anyone is. Gave me a super low grade for participation and I engaged in a lot of discussions. You must write 4 D2L posts per week. The course seems fine until he starts giving final marks.

5.0
2.0
PHL522
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 19, 2025
Would take again

The professor is excellent. The students are not. Instead of cheating, study.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

44%

Textbook Required

34%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 43 grades
Most common grades:
A (17)
A- (11)
Not sure yet (9)
Grade Distribution
A(18)B(7)C(2)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(16)
Based on 53 reported grades
A: 17
A-: 11
Not sure yet: 9
B: 7
Common Tags
Participation matters (21)
Get ready to read (19)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (12)
Gives good feedback (12)
Respected (12)
GROUP PROJECTS (8)
Skip class? You won't pass. (8)
Caring (7)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.93 avg change
May
Dec
Dec
Jul
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHL710

5.0

(1)

PHL504

5.0

(1)

cphl611

5.0

(1)

cphl504

5.0

(1)

PHL430

5.0

(1)
+7 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHL522

3.2

PHL504

3.0

cphl504

3.0

PHL430

3.0

PHL201

2.8

Similar Professors