2.8

Todd Barnet

Legal Studies - Pace University (all)

2.8
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
117
Reviews
2.8
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
2.7
Helpful
2.8
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

117

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
117 total ratings

5

18

4

29

3

21

2

25

1

24

What Students Say

Horrible grading scale

LAW101 - 2.0 rating

Gives homework every class

LAW101 - 2.0 rating
Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
A (2)
Not_Sure_Yet (2)
C (2)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 7 reported grades
A: 2
Not_Sure_Yet: 2
C: 2
Rather_Not_Say: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.20 avg change
Dec
Jan
May
Dec
Feb
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

LAW1013

4.0

(1)

LAW313

4.0

(1)

LAW610

3.5

(6)

LAW

3.3

(3)

LAW305

3.2

(13)
+9 more courses
Difficulty by Course

BUSLAW2

5.0

LAW312

5.0

101

4.0

BUSLAW10

4.0

BUSLAWII

4.0

Reviews (115)
5.0
2.0
LAW305
Nov 14, 2001

Humorous, helpful, interesting

3.0
4.0
LAW101
Nov 12, 2001

No Comments

4.0
1.0
LAW101
Nov 18, 2001

tests are pretty easy but doesn't lift his feet! kind of silly!

4.0
2.0
LAW1013
Nov 14, 2001

Boring but makes occasional jokes. He seemsto be in his own world

5.0
2.0
LAW101
Grade: A
Nov 18, 2001

No Comments

5.0
2.0
LAW
Nov 21, 2001

easy tests(just study hws), interesting lectures,

4.0
2.0
LAW101
Nov 21, 2001

It's not a boring class..just do all HW and review it before test.

4.0
3.0
LAW101
Nov 27, 2001

Very good teacher. Help me understand all the concepts of law

4.0
3.0
LAW101
Dec 13, 2001

He is very nice and very understanding.

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Dec 14, 2001

the worst

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Dec 21, 2001

the exams are very hard!!!

4.0
3.0
LAW101
Dec 26, 2001

exams not always graded fairly and be sure to do all the hw.

5.0
2.0
LAW101
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Jan 3, 2002

Not hard at all. Just do the HW's and you'll be fine. Nice and articulate.

3.0
3.0
LAW101
Grade: C
Jan 7, 2002

Mixed feelings, look elsewhere for other professor

4.0
3.0
LAW101
Jan 17, 2002

very nice and fair, study ur hws or ull be surprised!!

3.0
3.0
LAW101
Jan 25, 2002

Seemed nice at first...but he turned out to be an unfair grader

3.0
3.0
LAW101
Mar 6, 2002

No Comments

5.0
2.0
LAW101
Apr 9, 2002

He's very helpful, and clear, just do the HW

5.0
5.0
LAW305
Mar 28, 2002

Explains laws in a very detail matter! If you want to learn LAW take him!

2.0
4.0
BUSLAW10
Apr 23, 2002

this guy doesn't respect you,don't ask "stupid" questions....so he says

2.0
4.0
LAW101
May 18, 2002

test are tricky

2.0
4.0
LAW101
May 25, 2002

ugh, dont take him i hated the experience, take someone else like fox

5.0
2.0
LAW101
May 30, 2002

he's a great professor. Def take him, you'll learn alot

3.0
4.0
LAW305
Aug 30, 2002

Nice person but tests are not graded fairly; don't ask questions

1.0
1.0
LAW101
Sep 4, 2002

very unclear..always has a story to tell and goes out of topic...

4.0
3.0
LAW305
Oct 20, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Oct 29, 2002

The hardest tests ypo've ever seen

5.0
3.0
LAW101
Nov 1, 2002

Has an excellent understanding of legal studies...intelligent and articulate.

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Oct 29, 2002

Never take him

3.0
3.0
LAW101
Nov 3, 2002

tells good stories. just do hw. and read the chapters. all is goood

3.0
2.0
LAW101
Nov 5, 2002

Tests are exactly like the HW, you don't even have to go to class- self sign in

1.0
4.0
LAW101
Nov 11, 2002

horrible prof...DO NOT TAKE HIM!!

3.0
4.0
LAW101
Nov 13, 2002

EVERYTHING IS A SPECIAL CASE WITH HIM! IF U WANT 2GET CONFUSED-HE'S UR MAN!

2.0
3.0
LAW101
Nov 21, 2002

Dont take him he doesnt grade fair

3.0
4.0
LAW305
Dec 5, 2002

Very hard tests, but if you study and know the laws, you'll be fine.

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Jan 3, 2003

Do yourself a favor and avoid this teacher

1.0
4.0
LAW101
Jan 17, 2003

makes it seem as if hw is very important but its not.

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Jan 12, 2003

test have nothing to do with the book makes you do useless homework

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Jan 17, 2003

IF HE'S A LAWYER I CAN BECOME PRESIDENT

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Feb 3, 2003

DUDE! NO ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR 5 ACRE PROPERTY UPSTATE!

2.0
2.0
LAW101
Jan 20, 2003

not bad, all you have to do is show up,and do the hw. the test are not that hard

5.0
1.0
LAW101
Mar 3, 2003

I think it's kind of unfair to call him horrible . He seems to be not a tough guy, and his exams are not that hard. Besides, his lectures are usually interesting and helpful.

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Mar 19, 2003

No Comments

3.0
4.0
LAW101
Apr 21, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
LAW105
Apr 22, 2003

Not a bad guy, very easy tests, but really weird. Tells bull**** stories all the time, take this calss if you want a good grade but expect a sketchy semester.

4.0
3.0
LAW305
May 3, 2003

He's not bad. The homework isn't important to your grade, but it does help. I liked the books and his stories were always amusing...kinda reminded me of an ambulance chaser/sleazy lawyer but in an amusing way. He definitely knows his stuff though.

2.0
4.0
LAW101
Jun 2, 2003

Very unclear prof. if he dose not agree with the book he expects you to remember his justification for the question. Did not enjoy his class hw useless and he dose ant check it. Dont take him

1.0
5.0
LAW101
May 5, 2003

Opt for Fox instead.

2.0
3.0
LAW305
Sep 3, 2003

Disorganized. He was more interested in the students who were working in law enforcement (there were a couple in class) than in the rest of us.

1.0
5.0
LAW101
Sep 16, 2003

Fox is a better option, even if he IS on a Friday.

3.0
3.0
LAW305
Oct 14, 2003

DOES NOT LIKE QUESTIONS- I WONDER IF HE IS EVEN AN ATTORNEY BY SOME OF HIS ANSWERS

5.0
2.0
LAW101
Dec 11, 2003

great, great guy...if you do the homework and somewhat pay attention in class then the tests are a breaze. helluva guy and real personable

4.0
3.0
LAW101
Nov 17, 2003

He is not a terrible teacher, doesn't really check the hw and reviews for the exams which are not hard

4.0
2.0
LAW305
Jan 3, 2004

The class wasn't too difficult. Goes over basically all that will be on tests prior to them.

1.0
3.0
LAW101
Apr 19, 2004

Avoid if you can. Deserved an A and recieved a C. Was not helpful in any way. I wonder...Can he really be a lawyer???????

1.0
5.0
LAW305
Feb 9, 2004

THE WORSTTTTTT< DROP IF YOU HAVE HIM!!!!!!!!!!

2.0
4.0
LAW305
May 11, 2004

Deserved a B and he gave me a C. His class should be called Search & Seizure. This is all he teaches. If you don't have to take him don't.

2.0
3.0
LAW305
May 7, 2004

Does not like questions, either because he can't answer them or does not want to be bothered

1.0
3.0
LAW101
May 12, 2004

Awful man!! refuses to answer questions and will not admit that he is wrong. Does NOT think like an attorney...whatever you do, stay away..he will ruin your semester

4.0
2.0
LAW101
May 14, 2004

He's not as bad as everyone is making him out to be. Just do your homework, pay attention and show him that you're trying. The midterm was easy but the final was hard. Type of teacher to curve if necessary.

4.0
2.0
LAW101
May 13, 2004

He's alright. Your grade depends solely on your exam grades. Exams are fair and reflects what he has taught. If you pay attention in class it is impossible to get less than a C. With some effort a B and above is sure.

3.0
4.0
LAW101
May 17, 2004

Awful professor, please STAY AWAY. Everything depends on the midterm and the final, he doesnt grade on anything else. So if you get a bad grade on one of them, you will end up with a C in the class, hes horrible and boring

4.0
2.0
LAW101
Jun 2, 2004

Is not the best prof. in the world but he's alright. If you pay attention in class and go over the homework somewhat you are guaranteed at least a C without effort and a B with little. Do what you're supposed to do and you have an easy A.

4.0
4.0
LAW101
Jun 10, 2004

Class is fully based on the midterm and Final exams. There is an extra credit paper that does help out a bit. The hw isn't very useful in the grading process. Do Not think this is an easy A class. You have to understand the principles completely.

4.0
1.0
LAW101
Jun 27, 2004

he's a cool guy easy the test are very easy there is homework. He's class is a lot of fun he is abset a lot. He like to talk about drugs all the time it's fun. Take him

3.0
3.0
LAW
Nov 11, 2004

decent guy

3.0
2.0
LAW305
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Dec 8, 2004

Class is mainly about search and seziures. Not much excitement. Class based on midterm and final with an extra credi assignment he gives alot of homework. Do not really take attendance. He is ok.

4.0
1.0
LAW313
Dec 20, 2004

Nice Professor, not very organized but a great person. do your work, come to class and you'll get a good grade.

2.0
4.0
LAW101
Apr 20, 2005

He is a nice guy, but it is hard to learn from him. Your whole grade is depended on a midterm and a final. If you do bad on them, then your grade would suffer. He does gave extra credit but it is useless...8-10 pages for only 5 points...and it has to be good to get the points. Take someone else!

1.0
4.0
LAW101
May 13, 2005

The good ratings are obviously by the professor himself. Grade based soley on two tests and the extra credit is crap. Stay away if you want an A.

2.0
4.0
LAW
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
May 18, 2005

this guy is the worst law prof. grade based solely on 2 freaken hard exams. doesnt give any real notes, you must use the book to teach yourself. oh yeah he gives and extra credit but its a huge paper and you get like nothing for it. stay away cause theres much better law profs

2.0
4.0
BUSLAWII
Jul 6, 2005

ALTHOUGH THIS PROFESSOR SEEMS NICE, HE IS INCAPABLE OF TEACHING. HE READS FROM THE BOOK AND YOU MUST TEACH YOURSELF. THE WORST PART OF THIS NONSENSE IS THAT YOUR GRADE IS BASED ONLY ON TWO EXAMS. THEREFORE, IF YOU ACHIEVE LESS THAN OUTSTANDING RESULTS ON THE MIDTERM, YOU'D BETTER TRY 10x HARDER. DESPITE THIS ALL, YOU MAY ACHIEVE ONLY A 'C'.

1.0
5.0
BUSLAW2
Oct 28, 2005

Ludicrously bad! grade is based on nothing, he says it the test..but you can do well on both and he will still give you a C. DO NOT TAKE HIM

2.0
3.0
LAW101
Nov 14, 2005

Ugh, nice guy but boring and seems like he's just gives out C's. Had favorites in the class even though those girls were late all the time. Spoke to his favorites.

2.0
4.0
101
Nov 14, 2005

Only talks about nonsense. Uses drugs for every example. talks about weed and cocaine. only that and other stupid subjects. half the class failed the midterms. and he doesnt know if he wants to curve it" hes upset with thte class" TEACH SOMETHING!!

3.0
3.0
LAW360
Dec 21, 2005

This guy is so boring. For a lawyer, he doesn't seem to know whats going on and talks about his sister all the time. Doesn't really explain things properly.

1.0
4.0
BUSINESSLAW1
Jan 5, 2006

This professor is useless... he was extremely unclear and never focused on anything except drug laws. The subject matter discussed in class never made it onto the exams. His grading policy is also horrible - two very difficult exams determine your final grade. Avoid him at all costs... he shouldn't be allowed to teach.

1.0
1.0
LAW360
Apr 11, 2006

the guy has an obsession with his sister. god, he talks about her all the time. he doesn't know anything- even i know more than him. he's always, always confused (!!!) -even when he's reading off the text. he'a always seeking confirmation- just nod your head and smile and say "right professor, right".

4.0
2.0
LAW101
Apr 17, 2006

He is a really nice professor but his teaching method is totally useless.Ask you to do homework for a chapter before he even touch on it and sometimes gives you 1 days to complete.You can hand in your homework late though.Very helpful outside of class and test isnt too hard as long as you study.Lets you leave on time,never early.

2.0
5.0
LAW101
May 7, 2006

unclear, lots of little anecdotes. read the chapters and study and you'll do fine. homework is huge and he basically spells out the exams

2.0
5.0
LAW101
May 9, 2006

STAY AWAY!! seriously.. very very difficult... you'll regret taking him. Doesn't stick to what is suppose to be taught in class, but talks about drugs, his sister, his son, his nephew, etc. I ended up dropping the class. He also expects you to know not only NY State law, but also other states' law.

2.0
5.0
LAW101
Sep 20, 2006

Not a good teacher to take...he expects you to make up decisions for cases that he gives you. Twelve scenarios and you have to pick ten, it's for both the final and the midterm. I got a C on the midterm bombed the final and ended up with a D, and that's considered lucky...He has a lot of knowledge, but he doesn't realize it's a 101 class.

1.0
5.0
LAW312
Oct 27, 2006

he does not know how to teach the subject and he avoids the questions that he receives with his stupid family tales. always loves to show off or bluff that his rich with his property buying tales. he does not care for a student especially if you are from out of country and in honest words, he is a ****. very ignorant and a real a$$. SERIOUSLY.

3.0
5.0
LAW101
Nov 16, 2006

this guy has no idea what hes doing...avoid at all cost

3.0
2.0
LAW101
Jan 20, 2007

not as bad as ppl make him out to be if you listen to him and understand what he talks about his tests aren't that bad

4.0
1.0
LAW101
May 17, 2007

yea he requires you to know other states law & all these other laws because its university requirements. Listen in class & do the homework can't do worse than a B to a B+ he isnt hard, nice guy.

4.0
3.0
LAW101
Aug 22, 2007

Not a bad teacher. His lectures are long but he tries to keep them interesting. Best way to pass his class is to do hw & try to stay awake.

3.0
3.0
LAW101
Nov 9, 2007

I feel this guy comes straight out the courtroom to the classroom. He isnt the most helpful. doesnt answer any ques during exam, and doesnt grade homework. He creates no extra work for himself and just grades the midterm and final. he really couldn't care less about teaching. I say if you take him cool but there are more helpful profs than him.

4.0
2.0
LAW101
Jan 15, 2008

Smart, experienced professor. Will answer any personal law questions, and give just useful tips. Days before test, loves to review and give practice questions and go over any possible question you could have. Do the homeworks so you do well on tests, yet he won't grade them. Easy to get good grades on final and midterm if you do the work he gives.

2.0
5.0
LAW101
Jan 20, 2008

Horrible grading scale. He bases you final grade on simply 2 tests, the midterm and final.. Makes you do homework, even though it has no affect on your grade. Dont take him if you want a decent grade...

3.0
5.0
LAW101
Aug 22, 2009

He bases your grade on only 2 exams and has hw that he doesn't grade. His exams are very hard. He wants very specific answer. His class was actually great but after realizing there was no way of getting a good grade it was different. try to avoid him if you care about your GPA. if you can make it pass or fail... go ahead you'll like him.

5.0
2.0
LAW610
Dec 12, 2009

Interesting class, Professor was well prepared and answered questions clearly. Read the book and you should do well. Don't miss classes and participate, read the book, do the hw and you'll get an A.

4.0
3.0
LAW610
Dec 18, 2009

Overall a pretty good professor. Clearly explains the goals of the course and then follows through. The material is not hard if your read the book and attend classes regularly. The exams are reasonable and sometimes probably easier than they should be given that its a topic tested on the CPA. Would definitely recommend his class to others though. Y

5.0
3.0
LAW610
Dec 18, 2009

If you actually want to learn something, take his class. If you just want to breeze by on BS then opt out. Overall, he is a good professor. Clearly states the goals of the course and follows through. The exams are reasonable for graduate level courses and at times even slightly easier than they probably should be given that this topic is tested on

5.0
2.0
LAW101
Jan 10, 2011

Teaching from actual experience with a long career as a lawyer. Often uses his cases as examples. Really holds your attention. Offers simpler explanations than the book. What he says as well as what's in the book is on exams. Attendance & note taking are important if you want an A.

4.0
3.0
LAW101
Jan 24, 2011

Hope he is good, my score for him so far.

2.0
3.0
LAW101
Jan 25, 2011

Endless homework that counts for nothing, he just reads from his powerpoints,... Class was somewhat interesting as he uses his own cases. Tests go from easy to impossible!

4.0
1.0
LAW101
Apr 27, 2011

He's a really nice guy. Gives you 3 tests which are easy if you study for them. NEVER CUMLATIVE. You have 12 homeworks that take about 30 minutes to do. He doesnt look them over but if you do them ALL by the day they are due he gives you 5 points added to your overall gpa. Go to class, he's very understanding and funny and wants everyone to succedd

5.0
3.0
LAW101
May 10, 2011

Great professor. Got an A but had to work and study for it. Hes extremely knowledgeable in his field but if your looking for an easy A hes not the guy. Gives hw every week. I personally was not interested much in law so i had a bit of a hard time. Non cumulative exams is a plus. Test can be a bit hard.

3.0
2.0
LAW101
Nov 7, 2011

Experienced and humorous, Barnet teaches with PPT and assign homework every week. His voice can be a little soft and thus unable to control the class. I would recommend anyone to take his class.

2.0
4.0
LAW101
Dec 3, 2011

I am certain that there are better professors than this. He speaks very very low and just often reads off the PTT. He assings a ton of weekly homework off the textbook that only count for five points in final grade, Makes his test super hard and hardly ever reviews. AVOID TAKING HIM.

2.0
1.0
LAW101
Dec 6, 2011

He's a very low speaking teacher, tests are multiple choice and true/false. Gives homework every class. Looks like George Bush and his extremely boring to listen to. Other than that, bring laptop for leisure and easy A if you hand in work, curves each test!

4.0
3.0
LAW101
May 13, 2012

Barnet is a good professor. Just pay attention and show up and you will definitely get an A. he has a lot of experience and he tells a lot of relevant stories

1.0
5.0
LAW610
Sep 4, 2012

Avoid this guy. He should not be teaching.

4.0
3.0
LAW101
Dec 11, 2012

Really fantastic professor. Highly educated and well experienced. Voice is a bit boring, and moves quickly but the book is your best friend, and will clarify it all. Show up, bring your laptop and read the chapters before the test. you'll get an A.

2.0
4.0
LAW610
Dec 12, 2012

This guy should stay home. He is like a zombie, half dead. He makes students read the text in the class because he gets tired if he reads a lot. This class could be a lot interesting.

2.0
5.0
LAW101
Apr 10, 2013

Horrible, boring, not helpful, dry and dreadful

5.0
1.0
LAW101
Apr 25, 2013

I absolutely love this professor!!! The material flows together. If you read the chapters and do the homework you will understand the tests perfectly. He really is a talented lawyer and I am so glad I had the pleasure of being in his class. HIGHLY RECOMMEND.

2.0
3.0
LAW101
Dec 16, 2013

The book is your best friend, so is the homework. If you read and do the homework you should end up with a B. Second exam was very tricky, but the first and last were a breeze. Pay attention to examples he gives in class there often on the tests.

2.0
3.0
LAW101
Grade: C
Jan 16, 2014

The book is your best friend. Do the homework for your own benefit but as long as you turn something in each week than you'll get the extra credit at the end of the semester that will boost your grade. The tests can be tricky so listen for what he says will be on the test but you'll mainly have to study on your own.

5.0
2.0
LAW101
Grade: A
May 14, 2014

This professor was my favorite all semester. Very kind and considerate. Some people here have complained that his voice is not loud enough but he uses a portable PA system now so it is not a problem. HW is reasonable as are the midterm and final. A joy to listen to his lectures and stories. Highly recommend his class.

4.0
3.0
LAW610
Dec 30, 2014

He is a great professor. Had 2 exams and written homework-due weekly . He speaks very quite, so seat in-front of the class if you want to learn something. During his lecture he follows the textbook and supplies examples and funny stories from his experience. Exams are fairly easy if you do the homework, short essays, similar to homework problems.

4.0
2.0
LAW101
Feb 3, 2015

A little quiet but has a microphone now. Pretty funny. He explains everything very well but it is easy to lose track of what he is talking about because he has a very subtle voice. He has a lot of on hand experience and real world experiences. He is easy, relaxed, and doesn't require too much of his students. One of the better law professors.

5.0
1.0
LAW101
Feb 18, 2015

Great guy. Open to criticism and has so much real world experience

1.0
4.0
LAW101
Dec 15, 2015

Hard to understand. Not a good explainer. Don't have patience.

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
A (2)
Not_Sure_Yet (2)
C (2)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 7 reported grades
A: 2
Not_Sure_Yet: 2
C: 2
Rather_Not_Say: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.20 avg change
Dec
Jan
May
Dec
Feb
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

LAW1013

4.0

(1)

LAW313

4.0

(1)

LAW610

3.5

(6)

LAW

3.3

(3)

LAW305

3.2

(13)
+9 more courses
Difficulty by Course

BUSLAW2

5.0

LAW312

5.0

101

4.0

BUSLAW10

4.0

BUSLAWII

4.0

Similar Professors