3.8
Quality3.0
Difficulty70%
Would Retake145
Reviews70%
Would Retake
145
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
72
4
25
3
14
2
21
1
13
What Students Say
“first, Tom smiths attitude is awfully rude”
ECON201 - 2.0 rating“Exams don't reflect lectures & no feedback is given”
BUS201 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
24%
Textbook Required
29%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
+0.14 avg changeRatings by Course
201
5.0
(1)SPORTS
5.0
(2)BUS321
5.0
(1)FIN324
5.0
(1)ECON271
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
ECON201
4.0
FIN321
3.4
FIN201
3.1
201
3.0
ECON231
3.0
Reviews (145)
A cool guy, like him as a person but not a teacher that will wow you. Gets class involved, has pulled a few pop quizzes.
Great teacher-- will always keep you entertained. Relates everything to real life. Terrible organization.
Smith is a great econ proffessor. He's fun to talk to, great to listen to, and makes econ more than bearable. I'd highly suggest him for students who haven't had too much econ before, as he takes his time and makes it count. His homework is not too hard, and his tests are tough but manageable. If you work hard you can expect a good grade.
Professor Smith is very energetic and it is quite evident that he loves what he does. He uses great examples and makes this class fun. I recommend him any day. He is by far the best teacher i've had at Emory to date! If you want to learn and love energy then professor Smith is your guy! Yar dude!
Really nice guy and great at explaining difficult concepts. However, the class is pretty difficult and the tests are asked in ways that require a lot of critical thinking. You can't just memorize what to put down, you get asked real problems and you have to apply your knowledge and in that way your grade can sometimes get screwed.
Smith is a great professor - knowledgeable and passionate. Instead of memorizing and spitting back information he makes you apply it to real world problems. I got an A without too much difficulty. I basically read the book before class, paid attention, and studied 1-2 days before the exam. People who say he is hard are obviously not very smart.....
Smith is a very energetic and passionate teacher! His lectures are very engaging, and he LOVES to relate his topics to current-world examples. Tests/quizzes can be challenging because they demand a lot of conceptual thinking. The class is great if you want to learn fundamentals of econ. But it is difficult, so be prepared
He was a cool guy his class was pretty easy even though like, he was never there for office hours. He was pretty slimy though, and my AP Econ teacher taught better than him. Class was good though, I'd recommend it.
Was not clear about homework assignments, quizzes, exams. Did not post powerpoints to the conference till the night before the exam (that too after dozens of reminders by students)
Smith is the man.Really cares about his students and how they do on the exams. Goes on some tangents, but usually these tangents are the type that make the class more interesting. Smith also is very clear on how he wants his answers to be put on his exam. He also tells his students exactly what is going to be on the tests, but the class is not easy
Professor Smith is a very enthusiastic teacher. He will try his best to get the class into the lecture. He does have a habit of purposely choosing someone who got an answer wrong to help them remember. Best way to study for his tests and quizzes in my opinion is to listen to his lecture and write down as many notes as possible, even if he repeats.
I don't know how I feel about this guy... We all thought he was great because he would tell us exactly what the test would look like, but then when we actually got the test it looked completely different. The only time it followed what he said was for the final exam. He's very egotistical but he makes funny jokes in class.
Professor Smith is awesome! He's an incredibly interesting professor and explains concepts really well. Very passionate and truly inspiring
Smith is a great professor, teaches topic really well, is really funny and uses real-world (interesting) examples to explain concepts. Strongly recommended.
Dr. Smith is an enthusiastic teacher and good at explaining concepts, but his tests do not accurately reflect the level of difficulty of problems done in class. In other words, the tests are much harder than he says they are going to be and he can be misleading.
His class is not hard at all. He thoroughly explains concepts, and he was a fun teacher. It's really hard to do bad in this class unless you choose not to put in the effort. Tests are doable; they were not hard as long as you studied. The book is not necessary because he provides you with notes. Pay attention in class, study, and you'll be fine.
He is a cool enough guy, but I don't know how much I actually learned about economics from his class, particularly with macroeconomics. If you have taken econ in high school the class is no challenge at all. Even if you're new to econ though it really isn't that bad.
I took a class with Smith last year and the class was interesting but the organization was a bit crazy. Wow, what a turn-around. He must have actually read the end-of-semester evaluations because his entire class was on-line and ready to go by the first class. He brought in some of the best guest speakers I've ever seen at Emory - perhaps the best!
If you're going into the B school you probably have to take Smith - which is actually a good thing. He actually teaches business - his tests and assignments are actual business cases pulled right out of the news. I was able to throw down some econ during Spring break which impressed my Dad (hard to do!) Heard his sports class is amazing!
Professor Smith is an absolutely amazing lecturer. He actively engages the class throughout the entirety of lecture. He can tell when a class is not understanding a topic and will try and get students to understand the topic of the lecture. He is a tough grader and you'll have to study for tests and exams, but he really wants you to learn.
first, Tom smiths attitude is awfully rude! I haven't learned anything from this class unfortunately. Nothing conceptual is learned in class. All you are given in notes are graphs to memorize and in class nothing is learned. His lectures go on tangents and don't cover anything and for the test you're expected to branch out..i don't recommend
Exams don't reflect lectures & no feedback is given. Smith tries to come across as chill & caring, but didn't find him to be this way. He's difficult to schedule appointments with. Took numerous emails till he responded & was unhelpful. Thought he was condescending to his students & in class felt uncomfortable seeing the way he treated students.
Do not take class from this professor
I can totally see how some people would be turned off by this professor - he expects a ton of detail on tests and cold calls. The tests are exactly like the assignment and he drags the questions straight out of WSJ or business week. I thought he was egotistical but I went to his office hours again and again and was super helpful - actually nice guy
Smith is a phenomenal professor (one of the best I've had thus far) who uses real-life examples to explain economic concepts. Super engaging, you will never be bored in class. His class is very disorganized however, and there will times where you are frustrated or are unsure what is going on. Study for exams and you will be fine.
I thought Smith's class was all over the place and then I was in a position where I had to explain something "in real life" to a friend from Dartmouth and I knew what was going on (she didn't!). This sounds awful but I didn't expect to learn econ --class feels scattered but really isn't - I learned so much - he's a really good teacher.
Just finished taking course with Prof. Smith - probably the best Prof. I've had at Emory. Everything is straight out of CNN, WSJ or some other news site. He teaches the material using examples -- the test were exactly like the homework. Gave a ton of extra credit - office hours were every-other day and spent time working over problems in class.
I took a class with Prof Smith - really on point. Great lectures, provides notes for each topic, no textbook required. Like other's have said, tests are based on topics from NY Times or WSJ - if you pay attention to news you can almost guess the questions. Posts lectures to web as podcasts or video-casts - super helpful and easy to study from.
Probably the coolest professor I've ever had. That being said, Film Finance is kind of a joke. He began the semester by saying it's impossible to accurately predict how much money a movie will make, and then proceeded to teach a course about how to do just that. Hard not to love Smith though. Easiest class I've taken at Goizueta.
The quizzes and tests are pretty much examples from the news -- if you are out of touch you won't notice that the questions are pretty much handed to you. Totally messed up the midterm and went to office and he gave me a chance to re-do some problems and talk through my work - pretty awesome to have second chances. Seems pretty caring overall.
Smith is known for being really cool and his finance electives for being fun and easy. Not sure what happened this past semester. He gave me a B in Film Finance after I thought I was on track to get an A all semester. My friends had the same experience. Grading criteria were not clear at all. Useless class unless you're going into film production.
Just finished a course with Smith - the guests he brought to class were hands down the best I've hear at Goizueta. We finished the semester with a lecture from a professional baseball player from the Astro's. I have no idea how he knows all these people but it sure makes for an interesting class. Good assignments, lots of office hours, nice guy.
He gives very good lectures. Has this amazing ability to randomly bring in extremely well thought out and relevant examples of classroom discussion. there was a lot of work for this class, but everything was fairly graded and he's actually open to giving you back points if you see him in office hours. not an easy A, but at least a B+
He is certainly one of the best professors at Emory. He was able to explain very difficult concepts in a very simple way. He doesn't take attendance and his class is normally at 8:30 am. Still, you NEED to go to class, please do. Going to class will almost guarantee you an A and you will not get bored with him. Also, see his TA and go to office hrs
Sporadic discussions, provides real-life applications to concepts although could significantly benefit from clearer guidelines and grading criteria. Also not accessible outside classroom setting. Would not take again to prevent myself from another major headache.
8:30 am classes generally terrible but I made it to all of these classes and learned quite a bit. Lectures are drawn from real-world concepts and tests and quizzes are basically versions of the lecture put into a real-world example. Gave lots of chances for extra credit and seems pretty caring overall. Would definitely take another class with Smith
It's very beneficial to have many real life examples in class but I don't like the way he teaches. He goes too far beyond when something can simply be explained in one min, and it always causes more confusion. Also the course is poorly structured that many important concepts are not covered.
This is the type of professor I came to Emory to have. He clearly knows a ton about the topic and cares very much if his student learn. Has a lot of office hours and gives every opportunity to get points back on assignments, quizzes, midterm etc. His TAs are helpful and gives you old tests to study from. I learned a lot about economics.
Professor Smith is amazing! He took a clear interest in his students and he was really funny. I enjoyed his class thoroughly. He always made a point of relating what we learned to real life to ensure that it was relevant. The only downside of the course, though, was that we focused on microeconomics much more than macroeconomics.
Everyone seems to like professor Smith but I do not like the way he teaches. He's a funny guy but makes lectures much more confusing then they have to be. Great at giving lots of examples and practice problems that resemble the quizzes but grades harshly. He'll say one thing and grade it differently later making it hard to know what he wants.
Mr. Smith is one of the best professors at Emory. He's always very helpful, cares for his students and finds ways to make course material very interesting. It's best to actually attend his class, because his analogies make it very easy and time efficient to understand the material later. He's very funny and entertaining, and is always helpful.
Nice, laid-back guy. Class isn't well structured. Econ has a lot of moving parts and his scattered lectures didn't help. Doesn't give answer keys for practice tests. You have to go to office hrs to check them. Asks vague, repetitive questions which threw me off. TAs grade easier than he does so it's easy to think you know more than you do.
Go to class, take notes. Review all the practice problems he gives. You should be more than prepare for anything in this class. Really enjoyed his teaching styles.
Very chill professor - knows a lot about economics. Attend class and look over all practice problems and you'll do great - tests questions are taken right from the news -if you are current you can predict what he's going to ask. Has a bunch of TA with hours every night - super helpful especially during lockdown. Would take again - nice guy.
Lectures are very engaging and classes are not very difficult in general; however, the assignments can be a little trickey and requries a lot of thinking in order to do well. Doctor Smith offers a lot of office hours for reviewing the class material (and the assignmens) - I would advise everyone who takes his class to utilize these opporunities.
I really liked Dr. Smith's teaching style. Things can be unorganized at times but there is always something concrete and relevant that can be learned from his examples/stories. Attending lectures is a must and will set you up well for exams. Things are also application focused rather than theoretical which is another aspect I liked.
Dr. Smith is the best, all assessments are very similar to in class material. He goes over topics in depth, and is very available for questions and review sessions. No surprises, he tests you on what he teaches. Very funny lectures and passionate about the class.
Tom Smith is absolutely worth taking. Take one of his classes if you have any Econ interest. His FIN201 (BEcon) course was the most application-based course that I have taken. Through his easy-to-understand lectures and humor, I guarantee that anyone who shows up and engages with the lecture will be able to do well. He brings in amazing guests.
FIN201 is a relatively easy class and Tom delivers it in a digestible format with his real-world examples he explains in class. He'll usually tell you what's going to be on the test/quizzes and the TAs will help you with his assignments. Tom's extremely understanding and wants to see you succeed in his class. He makes the class fun and bearable.
One of the funniest teachers I've ever had. I was DREADING econ, but this class made me see the value in it and maybe even like it. There's no one "right" answer on tests as long as you argue your point logically. He will notice if someone's confused in class and go over that concept til they understand. Cares a lot, very flexible, and a great guy.
Really cool guy and the lectures dont really get boring or repetitive. The content goes really fast and the tests are all short answer questions.
Amazing lecturer. Always connects what we learn in class to events and trends in the current economy. Cares about the practical applications of what he teaches us.
I love Prof. Smith. His lectures are always funny, engaging, and very relevant to current events. He doesn't always stick to the syllabus or the schedule, so we ended up having a lot fewer assignments than expected. As long as you can clearly explain and argue for your answers, you'll do well. Overall, I learned a lot and really enjoyed the class.
Just incredible. You can really tell that he loves to teach and wants students to do well.
Very disorganized professor. Does not provide keys to practice exams. You have to find out answers for practice exam questions in his online office hour which often have a lot of repetitive questions. Does not give clear and engaging lecture.
Amazing lectures, super engaging and really organized. Gave a lot of practice tests and made answers readily available during office hours. Also gave plenty of chances to redo material and to improve grade. The class was split between microeconomics and macroeconomics - preferred the macro which was very intuitive and relevant. Would take again!
Professor Smith teaches with charisma and excitement. With all the content he teaches he also applies real-life situations in correlation to economics. Makes the information interesting. 100% recommend.
Genuinely a pretty funny guy which is rare for a teacher. He makes it sound like the course will be a lot more difficult than it actually will be. However, it won't be a super easy course unless you're already familiar with economics. As the other reviews said, he works in a lot of real world examples and stories to assist understanding.
Professor Smith is one of my favorite professors. He is extremely passionate about the material he teaches, and he always finds a way to connect the content in class with real-life, current examples. There is very little homework in the class (maybe 4 assignments the entire semester), and he is a very flexible grader when it comes to the tests.
professor smith is super good at clearly explaining concepts and breaking them down. his exams make sense and he clearly wants everyone to learn. you should be able to get an A in this class know a lot by the end which can't be said for a lot of professors here. he is super engaging which is helpful especially because this class is always at 8:30.
Everyone told me this class was very easy. His lectures are completely random, and he expects students to know how to code in R without really teaching them how to do so. He made up random deliverables/assignments throughout the semester and no one knew how to do them. Wouldn't recommend, there are easier classes in the b-school
Professor Smith is an engaging and good teacher! However, this class is NOT easy DO NOT take this for an easy A. The material is interesting and he gives extra credit to students in person! The one thing is that he does not like his own office hours and passes you off to a TA or tells you to reference your notes. He also is unresponsive via email.
I adore this professor. If you go to class and show you actually care about learning and the material, he will like you. His priority is having students understand the material, and he incorporates relevant topics from the news into the curriculum. Wish Emory (and the econ department) had more professors like him. :)
Do not take this man if you want to learn a thing in life. Does not record, disorganized as hell, snappy, cold calls and I couldn't ever make sense of him. If you skip his class you have no way to study. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE
Prof Smith is really good at connecting models to the real world. I found out that attending class is super important - if you don't attend class you wont know the model or the examples that are used. You need to know your material in order to get a good grade. He stopped recording Zoom after spring break so I had to come to class which was fine.
Smith is one of the best econ professors I've ever had. He's super passionate about the material and gives a decent amount of extra credit and makeup points. Attendance is optional, I didn't go to class most of the time and did fine. Tests are straightforward and similar to practice. The only issue is that you need a 95 for an A. Take this class!
Interesting class and hilarious professor.
Prof. Smith does a good job presenting material from the perspective of the real world. His notes package for Micro was very organized and used a lot of examples "ripped from the headlines." Tests are exactly like he tells you they will be - no surprises. His TAs are amazing - I felt like I could always find a TA when I needed something.
He prioritizes student learning so he and his TAs are often really accessible outside of the class. He also usually records the lectures and will even give out extra credit sometimes so I would recommend going to class! Smith really tries to make his lectures interesting by connecting the material into past economic situations.10/10 would recommend
Really engaging speaker. Really funny and humorous too. Absolutely recommend!!!!
Really funny lecturer (the Prince of analogies). His tests reflect the class material if you study hard. Very great Professor. 10000% TAKE HIM!!!
His lectures were very helpful and he kept students engaged and listening throughout each session. He clearly explained difficult topics and used interesting stories and analogies to help students learn. The only downside to his class is his grading criteria. He is VERY strict when grading and takes off many points for seemingly trivial mistakes.
Class wasn't too bad, but as someone has no aptitude in business it was sort of difficult. But his TAs are AWESOME, a ridiculous amount of extra help offered outside of class. He also records (most) lectures and has pretty frequent office hours. I did poorly on an exam but he very generously have me significant extra credit to make up for it.
Tom Smith is a good professor and a lot of the economics you learn is applicable to real life situations. Mostly a class on microeconomics, don't expect much macroeconomics. Material is simple if you pay attention in class and review every so often. Very few assignments so your grade is pretty much determined off of 3 tests.
Dr. Smith is super funny and cares about his students. He is very accessible for office hours and responds to his emails. Grading is very fair and clear and there's essentially no outside of class work other than a few small assignments. If you put in a decent amount of effort, it should be a fair A.
Professor Smith is a really good lecturer, and the class isn't hard as long as you show up to class. The tests/quizzes are EXACTLY what you learn in class. He will take off MANY points, if you do not draw the models exactly as he did in class.
Professor Smith is a great lecturer and classes were always very engaging. He changes the number of exams/quizzes/assignments based on what is needed, but this also made the exams count for a lot more. You need a 95% for an A which is feasible, but you have to do very well on exams and quizzes.
Took him in freshman year. Ask him questions in Office Hours if you don't understand the topics. Exams are straight forward and if you pay attention to the class, you will do well. Professor Smith is a funny person, and lectures are entertaining.
Professor Smith is one of the funniest professors at Emory. The in-class examples he uses are interesting and connected to real life. He spends too little time going over actual practice problems so ask questions. There are few tests, grading is a little tough, but class is not too hard especially if you've taken micro before.
Honestly one of the worst professors. Finishing his FIN201 class now and he is not accessible outside of class, does not care about his students, will not email you back at all, is disorganized, and I have genuinely learned nothing about econ from him. There are very few graded assignments, so everything matters a lot. DO NOT take his class.
Honestly one of the best professors at Emory. Took him for B-econ. He is a tough grader but fair - was able to get points back on elements that were missed. Held office hours every week and has a ton of TAs. Notes packet for microeconomics is very good - could use a packet for macro. More micro heavy than macro for sure. Would take again.
I liked his teaching style, gave a lot of examples. He is a tough grader but you can fight for points back if you know what your saying. He calls on people randomly so be ready, but no textbook is necessary
Prof. Smith is a really good economics teacher. He is very tough with grading - seeming to concentrate on very particular elements. He gives a lot of points back if you just stop in his office, flexible if you provide reason. He is very funny and tells a lot of stories. Everything is tied to some example from the news. Overall great experience.
Cares about his students, lectures are fun and engaging (expect cold calling), very funny, work is not hard at all, and simplifies the topic enough to understand easily. The only reason he's not a 5/5 is because class and his Canvas page are not organized well at all, and due dates are unclear.
Smith is an amazing professor. As long as you go to class, even though a 96 is the minimum for A, it is very easy to get an A because he tells you exactly what you need to know. He also never moves on with the material until everyone understands it, making tests very easy. Also, he provides lots of study guides whose questions are close to the exam
I did quite poorly in the course, but Professor Smith is a great professor. He lectures can be a bit winded, but they have good real world connections and lessons. If you need help with something, just go and ask him (be straightforward). He is the type of professor you hope to improve yourself for.
Professor Smith is disorganized, unclear grading criteria, test questions misleading, only gives personal examples in lectures but no clear definitions of concepts. Gives points back at office hours if he feels like it, not based on content. Have to beg him to post answer key for practice exams. Also cold calls. Not an ideal finance intro course.
Sitting each day in that classroom was anxiety-inducing. Poorly structured & unorganized & resulted in little knowledge despite the fundamental nature of the class. Extreme lack of practice problems and material to study & specific nature of grading without the expectations being expressed beforehand, (each assessment is a third of our grade).
Open ended questions on assessments that get graded by egotistical T.A's that often contradict what Professor Smith says in class, or graded by Professor Smith himself by rolling a dice. Only did well because I learned micro econ in high school, but this class was much harder than it should have been. Didn't learn much. Avoid this class.
Worst grade I got ever. Attended every class (they are 8:30am). Lots of examples/analogies but not enough explanations. Slow in providing materials, feedbacks and announcements. Said exam would be exactly same to class material but grading is strange.
Tom Smith is a great guy. He's super funny, and his lectures are good. But, the class is very test based, and there aren't many, so come prepared. Also make sure to participate in class, He will throw in a participation grade at the end, and that can be a harsh grade. The tests are graded difficultly. Just make sure you know the graphs well.
I can't say enough about prof smith. he's an excellent lecturer and brilliant economist. definitely worth getting up at 830 to hear him talk. sometimes he's a bit of a tough grader, but generally it's pretty easy to do well if you're detailed. just don't skip class.. material is way easier if it's explained to you
FIN 321 is different from most finance classes, as it uses R quite a bit. However, he walks you through how to use it, so even if you have little to no experience with it, you will be fine. Just make sure you get a good group, participate occasionally, and you will do fine. Chill and funny professor. A bit disorganized but he's working on it.
Prof Smith is very good at teaching economics. We had a weird situation in this course (those who took the class will know what I'm talking about) and Smith came in and brought the class to a good place. We learned mostly Macroeconomics, but I learned a lot, especially the Federal Reserve. I would like to take his other classes. Class act guy.
Class is always at 8:30 am even though Econ Majors have asked to have the class moved later in the day. That said, the class is pretty helpful. Most of the material is taken from current events or recent events such as Brexit. Prof. Smith does an excellent job connecting the ideas from class to the current events. Quite a bit of Xcredit.
Professor Smith is a highly respected and knowledgeable guy. Made the class fun, engaging, and exciting.
Tests were a bit confusing based off of lectures, but was a fun lecturer and concepts were relatively clear.
Smith is funny and interactive, but goes on many tangents during his lecture that ends up derailing me from the actual topic being discussed. He gives out extra credit in fun ways, but it's completely random and can actually be de-motivating for others to participate. Class isn't hard if you've taken econ before and he uploads extra review videos.
Teaches real-world applications of economics, pretty simple concepts, wants students to succeed, is a good person, and seems happy to be teaching. However, tests are inconsistently graded, his extra credit for corrections or participation is very random, and lectures are questionable.
Professor Smith is funny and always makes lectures interesting. If you have never taken Econ before, this class will definitely be difficult. The concepts are not hard to understand, however the tests can be confusing because grading is not consistent for all. He uses real life examples on exams and it can be unclear what exact response is needed.
Smith is one of the most fun and engaging professors I've ever had. He is able to explain economics in a very simple and palatable way, often using real-world examples. However, he does have some flaws: he can be disorganized and his grading criteria can be somewhat unclear. Still, he is a spectacular professor and I highly recommend taking him!
I respect this professor, and he seems funny, but the tests are inconsistently graded. Extra credit opportunities for corrections or participation feel random, and the lectures can be a bit questionable. He does pick on students randomly at times, but he can also be very understanding.
Lectures were absolutely pointless, and in my 65-person lecture, about 30 would come to class. We barely learned anything and spent most of the time goofing around, which is fun up until you have to take the test and get destroyed for minute, small errors. I would have done worse if I hadn't gone to him after every test and begged for points back.
He is dismissive and condescending. Participation matters in class, but he decides who participates. He gets sidetracked easily but expects that we extract the information that is going to be on the exam. The TA office hours weren't that useful. I learned nothing except that he loves the sound of his own voice. He belongs on TV, not in a classroom.
His lectures are pointless and confusing. He grades the tests randomly and inconsistently. 0 feedback is given on tests and hw, He changed the syllabus randomly and cannot finish the content by the end of the term and teach new stuffs in the voluntary review sessions. Very disorganized course
Genuinely a good dude. I love his humor but the hour 15 lecture could easily be compressed into a 15 minute one. Lots of tangents. On the 6 assignments all year, you better do good on all of them as one bad grade will screw you for the whole class.
Tom smith is a great guy with possibly the worst grading system I've ever seen. He radiates positive energy and I enjoy sitting through the lectures. However, he grades an 80 person lecture through participation. The catch is, you can participate and ask great questions, yet he decides whether you deserve it on how he feels at the time.
T Smith is incredibly hilarious, engaging, and cares about his students. Extra credit is given out randomly which makes the class a competition of who can kiss up the most. His tests can be graded randomly/unfairly and overall it can be hard to do well if you have not previously taken macro/micro (I have not). Great guy but unorganized teacher.
Professor Smith is a great guy and runs a very fun and lighthearted class. A lot of people were given extra credit from class discussions, I was not but if you do well on the exams and assignments you can do well in the class. It's important to go to office hours and make yourself known and show you care. It's helpful if you have taken macro/micro.
Great professor, his exams can be difficult but he gives several easy deliverables/projects and participation points to improve your grade. His lecture style involves many real-world examples and the course almost feels like he is just leading a discussion, not a typical lecture. He genuinely wants his students to do well.
Very engaging and fun lectures.Turns you into an expert economist and there is not a lot of coursework but the exams are tricky.
tom smith is a funny caring guy but that doesn't necessarily make him a good professor. he often makes mistakes while grading, so meet with him after each assessment to get points back because he will throw them out arbitrarily. what really matters is the 1 quiz and the final that makes up most of your grade.
Give out random extra credits (ducks) to great/random questions or comments, kinda mysterious criteria. Anyways, he gave his lecture notes (textbook), which were quite convenient. Homework and exams are worth most of the points, so be careful with each graph. An interesting professor, but sometimes the flow of the lectures got easily interrupted.
Prof. Smith is very charismatic and can make the class entertaining; however, the content is extremely boring. The bad thing about the class is that you are only graded on a few things. I got an A on all of the quizzes, deliverables, etc., but I got a B- on my final, which affected my final grade immensely.
Smith is a friendly person, but his lectures often become off-topic and unrelated to key course material. The content of the class is actually very straightforward. His confusing lecturing and grading style, however, makes it harder than it should be.
Professor Smith has a fun, engaging teaching style, but the class can be challenging. The tests are tough, so come prepared. Using unstuck study and the textbook really helped me stay on top of the material.
Smith's classes are definitely tough but I did learn a lot. His note packet was super helpful as were his videos and office hours. Participation matters a lot, so put your hand up and don't be afraid to ask questions in class. You can do well if you just sit back, but you're going to be more successful if you ask questions.
Prof Smith cares about the economic state of the union so much and he will make the entire class very topical. Very accessible after class. ATTEND LECTURE. You will not learn if you don't go because he doesn't provide notes/videos. Pretty chill guy overall. Make sure to label everything you do.
Engaging speaker, but easily THE MOST disorganized professor I've had. Lectures are scattered and rambling, the few assignments were graded slowly and arbitrarily, the syllabus was inaccurate the entire semester, and deadlines constantly changed. If you knew how to suck up or act like one of his favorites, you were rewarded.
Literally the most disorganized professor ever seen. As someone not familiar to R and the whole b-school vocabularies, extremely hard to follow to his teaching + diverging to talk abt other things and jokes that r not funny at all…. Have to learned anything from this class.Grading criteria extremely unclear and grades almost everything on last day
Absolutely hilarious and a joy to be around. Extremely down-to-earth and reasonable. His sole focus is that you understand material. Your grade in the class will reflect your effort. He is a great lecturer if you're a half-decent note taker. Will definitely be taking again.
He's clearly super passionate about the subject but I wouldn't recommend taking him if you want a good grade. His lectures are astonishingly disorganized and expect lots of studying on your own outside of the classroom.
This guy is all over the place.
Though Smith is a passionate professor, his lectures tend to wander off topic. His rubber duck participation system, where you get ducks/points for participating in class, is flawed, as it encourages people to ask lots of dumb questions just for the sake of getting points. Grading criteria's opaque. You lose points, and no feedback is given.
Smith is a great guy and very engaging teacher. The class focuses on current topics and he is willing to talk about what you are interested in. His grading is completely arbitrary, he often forgot to turn over the page to see the rest of my answers. Show up, take good notes, and draw models on the test EXACTLY as he showed them - you'll get an A.
Amazing teacher with great passion for subject, makes it very interesting. Anybody who complains about "not getting a good grade" is not ready for the curve or the B-School in general, it is not his direct fault that grading in this class is picky and tough. Only real flaw is he tends to give too lengthy explanations and it digs into class time.
Dr. Smith is a very passionate professor, you can tell he cares a lot about what he teaches. However, he is fairly unorganized, and chances are you will have to teach yourself, or beg a TA to explain the material to you, just to even have a chance at getting a B.
This guy is all over the place. Also has a policy for participation points, but he gives it out randomly. Also super inaccessible outside of class and doesn't respond to emails. Also functionally impossible to get an A since his curve is 96 and above.
the final exam is not too hard, but hes not a great lecturer. terrible participation policy and harsh grader
This was an easy but super interesting class. We covered not too much material which kept the workload down. He explains concepts clearly and gives good examples. He is an amazing person, funny, and fun. Take his classes. He switched from a few tests to just giving a bunch of little quizzes which was nice.
Engaging, funny lectures. Quizzes and Exams have the exact same content as in class, if you go over class problems you'll do well.
istg if i see on more rubber duck imma drop out
Smith is a good professor. Everything is taken right from the headlines - literally. Seriously, if I hear that phrase any more I'm going to lose it. But, other than the phrase, the entire class is super practical. Honestly, I wish my my other classes were more real life like this one. I don't think I like economics but I sure learned a lot.
I liked the macro section better than the micro section but still learned a lot of micro. I took micro in HS but was only taught to memorize a bunch of random graphs and had zero idea about what any of it meant. I actually learned what all those graphs actually mean and more.
I think Prof. Smith is actually a really good economist. He talks about macroeconomic topics on the news constantly - maybe that's why I liked macroeconomics better than micro. He certainly knew the Fed was going to change rate and I learned a lot about monetary policy. His macro section was the best. Good guy, too. He cares if students learn.
The guest lectures in this class were some of the best I've had at Emory. Smith knows a TON of professionals in the sports industry. We had people from the Master's Golf tournament, a former baseball player and the current receiver coach for the Broncos. Seriously, this is why I came to Emory. I'll never think of sports the same. Thanks, Smith.
Hard to get an A as its curved for a 96%+ based on like 3 assignments, a midterm, and final.
Overall good lecturer. He explains things by using real world cases, which is similar to his quiz questions. HOWEVER, HE IS NOT REACHABLE AFTER CLASS & OFFICE HOUR. Rarely reply email I would say. PLS BE AWARE OF HIS GRADING! Above 95.5 is A, and 90-95.5 is A-!!!!! Even though this class is easy, there is not too much space for you to make mistake.
The content in the class is overall very easy and Smith makes sure you know what will be on the tests. The thing is that you need a 96 to get an A and the class is mostly graded on three tests (the quiz, the midterm, and the final). If you screw one of these up, you are not gonna get an A. If you want an easier grading system, take Econ 101/102.
Tom Smith is clearly passionate, but his teaching style is flawed. His duck participation system, which solely determines your participation grade, encourages people to ask bad questions constantly, slowing down the class. Grading feedback is opaque, and he isn't accessible during office hours due to the line for ducks outside his office.
Course content would be so much easier to learn if Smith didn't love to hear himself talk. Goes on long tangents with little to do with the content, and then proceeds to grade the exams very harshly with no feedback. He'll also arbitrarily bump the grades of kids he likes. Overall an annoying course. Avoid.
I have a ~94. I have never taken a class where a 94 is not considered an A.
He's a great professor, engaging, approachable, and easy to get to know. Participation with duck points is a big focus (controversial, but I enjoyed it). His main flaw is forgetting what he's covered. My final included topics we never discussed or had in the packet, which felt unfair.
He talks a lot but he's pretty funny icl. Almost impossible to get an A tho unless ur insanely locked and even then u def have to be one of his favs. Weird grading system but willing to work with u if u go find him outside of class in particular. I barley studied for anything at all and got an A- so if u study u should get an A.
This prof is so unorganized, you have no clue whats on the exam even with a textbook until his day before 2 hour long zoom review sessions, which also have no agenda. 96% for an A is atrocious. Ppl ask bad questions just for participation points and he entertains every single one of them and goes on 20 minute tangents about those irrelevant topics
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
24%
Textbook Required
29%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
+0.14 avg changeRatings by Course
201
5.0
(1)SPORTS
5.0
(2)BUS321
5.0
(1)FIN324
5.0
(1)ECON271
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
ECON201
4.0
FIN321
3.4
FIN201
3.1
201
3.0
ECON231
3.0