2.5

Warren Gallagher

Chemistry - University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire

2.5
Quality
3.6
Difficulty
29%
Would Retake
90
Reviews
2.5
Quality
3.6
Difficulty
2.6
Helpful
2.4
Clarity

29%

Would Retake

90

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

6

4

17

3

21

2

26

1

20

What Students Say

Prof Gallagher wasn't the greatest teacher in class, however when I did visit him in his office hours he really did do a good job clearing things up

CHEM150 - 4.0 rating

Online homework every week but its easy to do

CHEM150 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

69%

Textbook Required

29%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 31 grades
Most common grades:
A (12)
B (6)
B+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(13)B(9)C(4)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(5)
Based on 36 reported grades
A: 12
B: 6
B+: 3
C: 3
Common Tags
Tough grader (10)
Skip class? You won't pass. (8)
Lecture heavy (8)
Lots of homework (8)
Test heavy (6)
LECTURE HEAVY (5)
Caring (4)
Respected (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.41 avg change
Mar
May
Aug
Oct
Dec
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHEM452

4.0

(2)

CHEM103

3.2

(15)

CHEM453

3.0

(1)

CHEM103LAB

2.8

(4)

CHEM150

2.6

(50)
+6 more courses
Difficulty by Course

CHEM150901

5.0

CHEM352

4.8

CHEM105

4.3

CHEM453

4.0

CHEM150

3.7

Reviews (90)
2.0
3.0
CHEM150
Apr 15, 2004

he looks scared in front of the class and is unable to answer many questions

1.0
5.0
CHEM150
Apr 21, 2004

Doesn't give good notes. Gives simple examples but tough questions on test...almost like he's trying to trick you.

2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Apr 27, 2004

He seems scared an unsure of himself. He only goes over the basic concepts, but then goes way in depth on his tests. His tone of voice also makes his lectures very boring.

2.0
5.0
CHEM150
May 5, 2004

Gives poor notes, and very poor practice questions. He does nothing more than follow the book exactly, and gives you book print--outs for test reviews. Test questions are very hard though. Extremly boring to sit through lecture. Bad at relating info.

4.0
2.0
BIO150
Jul 1, 2004

I think that he is fair game; may be boring at times. He seems like he is scared but with the class size and the competitve students he's dealing with...I can completely understand. Do the work and you can earn a very good grade.

2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Oct 15, 2004

Lectures constisted of him reading a powerpoint of notes on the book. Spent too much time on easy review stuff and rushed through the more difficult material. Review problems in book were not similar to problems on tests and quizzes.

1.0
4.0
CHEM150
Nov 14, 2004

All i have to say is read your book, becuase you will realize after you fail his first few quizes that you learn nothing from him and everything on your own. He is a really nice guy, but just not a good teacher at all and the material is not easy!

1.0
3.0
CHEM115
Apr 23, 2005

He is the worst prof I have ever had. His labs turn into three hour lectures... Do not take his class if you can avoid it... HONESTLY!

2.0
4.0
CHEM103LAB
Oct 17, 2005

Way too much lecturing in lab and for all the lecturing he does you still don't really understand what to do. Really no point reading the lab going into it b/c he explains it all, hope you dont have him for lab

1.0
2.0
CHEM103LAB
Nov 9, 2005

horrible lab professor. takes up too much time in lab lecturing on what lecture professor has already lectured. labs should be easy but he makes them diffuclt. take someone else for lab if you can. honestly a waste of my freaking time to even go.

5.0
2.0
CHEM103LAB
Grade: A+
Dec 13, 2005

EXPLAINS ALOT DURING THE LABS AND IT ALWAYS WILLING TO HELP WHEN YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. EASY GOING GUY BUT A GREAT LAB TEACHER!

3.0
4.0
CHEM103LAB
Jan 2, 2006

Talks a lot before the actual experiment, making lab much longer than it should be. Sort of intimidating at first, but helps you if you ask. Expects more out of you than an entry level chem course. Other lab profs. are much more enjoyable

1.0
1.0
CHEM150
May 21, 2006

Most boring class I have ever taken. He is very unclear and doesn't seem to know what he's talking about. I skipped most of my classes and the info I taught to myself gave me a better grade then listenting to him. Be prepared to teach yourself EVERYTHING because he is not going to. Exams are easy and repetitive. You can skip class and be fine.

4.0
2.0
CHEM150
Jul 25, 2006

Gallagher is not easy, but he does do a good job of teaching the material. The class is going to be tough and boring, but show up to class and do some outside studying and you'll do fine.

5.0
3.0
CHEM150
Nov 13, 2006

great teacher, at least for an "easy" nursing chem class

5.0
3.0
CHEM150
Nov 29, 2006

Very helpful if you take the time to see him. The class isn't terribly easy but reading the book and looking over his slides, it is not bad. He is a good teacher and a nice guy

2.0
2.0
CHEM150
Feb 10, 2007

nice guy, definitely willing to help you out. you never have to go to class. his exams are kinda tough, but do-able, he grades pretty easily. 4 exams is all that your grade is based on.

2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Apr 18, 2007

Warren doesn't teach this class. He jumps all over the place, races through slides, and he is not clear on what we are learning. Be prepared to teach yourself out of the book because going to class is pretty much pointless.

3.0
4.0
CHEM150
May 9, 2007

He gets a lot of rap for being unclear and confusing, which he is at times, but I also believe that this is his first time teaching this material after switching books. The class isn't horrible if you read the book and do the practice problems, but don't plan on relying on lecture.

3.0
4.0
CHEM150
Jul 6, 2007

I think he would be a better teacher if the class size were smaller. He provides slides for the lecture, but doesn't post slides until after most lectures. If you do the practice problems from the book he tells you to do, you will do fine on the exams, but be prepared to teach yourself the majority of the material from the book.

4.0
2.0
CHEM150
Jul 17, 2007

I felt bad for Gallagher. Students were rude and impatient with him. He was very helpful when I met with him during office hours. I do feel like he was overwhelmed sometimes and should have a TA to help.

3.0
4.0
CHEM103
Dec 6, 2008

I was unsure about him at first but got to know him and he really is a nice guy! Yea, the lab is longer than it needs to be, but he wants to make sure we understand the material and how it relates to what we will be doing. He is willing to help, however I basically taught myself the material through the book and practice problems. STUDY LOTS!

2.0
4.0
CHEM352
May 14, 2009

If you must take biochem, take another professor. Uses only powerpoint (no board usage), uploads the files as useless movies 1 - 2 days before the exams, and spaces the exams out horribly. One of the worst professors I've ever had-totally killed any interest I had in biochemistry. Take the 2 semesters of biochem instead of the 1 for the ACS degree.

4.0
4.0
CHEM452
Jan 16, 2010

I disagree with all of the negative comments. I think he did a great job presenting the material in a clear and easy that is easy to understand. He isn't going to hand-feed you everything, but this is a 400 level chemistry course - students need to take some responsibility to the textbook and learn the material. Overall, good prof, learned a lot

5.0
2.0
CHEM103
Nov 2, 2010

If you READ the lab manual before class you should be fine. He talks for an hour in the beginning but he explains what we will be doing in lab. He is always willing to ask questions and very knowledge able about the topic. The labs do take longer than they should, but that is because he makes shure you understand what the expariment is about.

5.0
3.0
CHEM103
Nov 17, 2011

Kind of a quiet guy, but helpful if you talk to him after class.

4.0
2.0
CHEM452
Dec 17, 2011

He is a good teacher, but a poor test writer. I thought I understood the class material very well, but the exams were something else. However, he is pretty easy on the grading scale to make up for it. The text book was useless.

4.0
4.0
CHEM150
May 1, 2012

He's a nice guy, but be prepared to teach yourself. He goes very quickly through the material but actually REALLY know the material when it comes to exams. They're a little on the tough side.

4.0
3.0
CHEM150
May 9, 2012

It's hard if you are not good at teaching yourself. Exams are hard. Some of the questions in the exams are not even discusse in lecture..but he is a nice professor n helpful if you go to his office hours. Overall, I still dont recommand taking him..he is too unorganize

2.0
5.0
CHEM150
May 15, 2012

The class he taught has been taught by other teachers. I made the mistake of taking it with him. This is a 100 lvl course but is taught as a 400 lvl by him. It is a weed out course to get rid of nursing students who won't get accepted. His tests are not notes based, nor r the quizzes. He never gave us enuf time, and wasn't very helpful w/ questions

3.0
4.0
CHEM150
May 21, 2012

Teach yourself through the book's practice problems. Lectures are pointless, just need the book. Exams are very hard but teacher is lenient on grading. Quizzes are nice because lowest 2 of 6 are dropped. Class is about drawing condensed structures of molecules and naming them. Once you get the hang of it, the rest of the semester goes smoothly.

3.0
4.0
CHEM453
Feb 10, 2013

Biochem I lab is interesting, but he spent the first hour or 2 of everyday lecturing/reviewing. it wouldn't have been as bad if he did it during the long breaks while the centrifuge was running, etc. He expected us to write abnormally long reports that were really weird. He was also a tough grader.

2.0
5.0
CHEM150
Feb 21, 2013

Please, please take this over winterm if you have to take this class. It is possible to do well if you take it with Warren, but honestly not worth the extra time that you are forced to put in if you actually want to do well.

2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Mar 12, 2013

If I could go back in time, I wouldn't have taken this course with this professor. It is extremely time consuming outside of class. He doesn't follow along with the book and jumps around frequently. Nowadays, I go to lecture to get participation points, but tune him out and teach myself through the book only. Be prepared to study A LOT.

3.0
5.0
CHEM150
Apr 8, 2013

Terrible professor. He doesn't follow his powerpoints and is always going on tangents that don't pertain to the material. Be expected to teach yourself, his tests are extremely hard, and the homework is pointless. I don't recommend him at all.

2.0
5.0
CHEM150
Apr 24, 2013

PLEASE try to take this online or with someone else. Nice guy, but NOT a good teacher. Goes through notes way too quickly, does not explain things well, and tests you on things you haven't covered in class. Lecture is pointless, he goes through so fast you can't process the info. Rely on the book, tho its very time consuming to learn it yourself.

4.0
2.0
CHEM103
May 4, 2013

I only had Dr. Gallagher for my lab but he was a very helpful professor. If my group had a question he would answer it and always helped us with the flow chart for the final lab practical. He wants what is best for his students but talks for a great deal of the lab period, so we often ran out of time.

1.0
5.0
CHEM150901
May 9, 2013

Gallagher was unprepared for lecture most of the time. He rarely answered questions well. The tests went on tangents that were extremely in-depth for a 100 level class. If you have ANY other option to take this class through a different professor, do it. I didn't struggle in my 200 level classes this year, yet this 100 level was a disaster!

3.0
3.0
CHEM150
May 22, 2013

His tests aren't the easiest, but he finds a way to make class easier by dropping two lowest quizzes and adding clicker points to the final grade. I got an A in the class, but had to work fairly hard for it. Be prepared to study a lot from the book and make sure to study from previous exams in past years.

2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Jul 19, 2013

His lectures went too fast to comprehend what was happening. The only point of going to class was to get iClicker points. If you have a question, he won't be of any help. His tests were difficult, the online assignments were time-consuming, and I had to get a tutor and study an insane amount to pull off an A. Don't take it with him!

1.0
4.0
CHEM150
Aug 29, 2013

Don't take this professor! He was unprepared for lecture, disorganized, unclear, unfocused and most of the examples he gave us in class were wrong and had to be corrected by students! His lectures are a waste of time aside from the clicker questions. He is a good guy, but a terrible professor.

4.0
3.0
CHEM150
Sep 5, 2013

Prof Gallagher wasn't the greatest teacher in class, however when I did visit him in his office hours he really did do a good job clearing things up. If you read the book thoroughly, go to class and go in for help you should be fine. I got a 95% but I did have to do a lot of work, but it is worth it!

4.0
3.0
CHEM150
Sep 5, 2013

Prof Gallagher wasn't the greatest teacher in class, however when I did visit him in his office hours he really did do a good job clearing things up. If you read the book thoroughly, go to class and go in for help you should be fine. I got a 95% but I did have to do a lot of work, but it is worth it!

3.0
2.0
CHEM150
Grade: A
May 7, 2015

His class is boring and he is kind of hard to follow for notes but he is definitely a nice guy. Online homework every week but its easy to do. He gives a study guide before the exam that identical to the exam but with different numbers so if you study that tests are easy. I would recommend this class for an easy A. Takes attendance by i clickers.

3.0
3.0
CHEM103
Grade: A-
Dec 3, 2015

Be prepared to teach yourself the chemistry and be prepared for loooong homework assignments weekly. Nice dude, not the most organized

3.0
2.0
CHEM103
Grade: A
Dec 9, 2015

Professor Gallagher is not one of the best teachers in class, however, if you stay after and ask questions he is much clearer. Online homework is due every other week and it is time consuming, but if you spend time to do well on it, it boosts your grade and prepares you well for tests. Overall, this class is quite easy if you devote time to it.

2.0
2.0
CHEM103
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2015

You have to have knowledge of chemistry going into this class, it wont be bad if you do. He lectures and it is kind of boring but usually helpful.

4.0
2.0
CHEM150
Grade: B+
Dec 22, 2015

This class rocked. It was actually interesting. Homework was not bad and you had forever to work on it. He was so helpful in office hours. I would totally take this class again.

3.0
3.0
CHEM103
Grade: B
Dec 26, 2015

You could either show up to class and not have to look at your textbook OR Read though each chapter on your own and take a nap during lecture.. both lead to the same result. Definitely do your online assignments, that's were I learned the most information.

3.0
3.0
CHEM103
Grade: A
Dec 30, 2015

Professor Gallagher is a nice guy and he definitely knows what he is talking about, however does not give a very good lecture. If I had not taken high school chemistry I don't know how I would have passed. That being said if you go to him for help he will go out of his way to help you.

5.0
3.0
CHEM103
Grade: A
Jan 20, 2016

Professor Gallagher was a really great professor. He is always available for help during office hours and really cares about you. Be ready for online homework. But with that being said, the homework is helpful in preparing for the tests and is also worth a decent amount of points. I really liked Dr. Gallagher and hope to have him again.

2.0
2.0
CHEM103
Grade: A
Jan 24, 2016

The class is still chemistry so it can still be kinda hard but on some occasions skipping class will not prevent you from passing the class. The online homework can be kind of a pain in the neck so it is advised to work with other students on it.

2.0
3.0
CHEM103
Grade: A
Feb 3, 2016

He was super confusing in lectures and was pretty boring. He is super smart but not really the best at teaching. However, his tests weren't too bad, he gave a study guide a few days in advance which really helped!

3.0
4.0
CHEM103
Grade: A
Mar 31, 2016

Lectures were boring and not very helpful, material was explained very poorly. Taught myself with the help of the online homework (OWL). Expect to spend many hours a week on homework. I left class frustrated many times and felt like my time was wasted. Tests are very similar to the study guides, so go to the SI reviews to check answers.

2.0
4.0
BIO150
Grade: C
Apr 26, 2016

Prepare to fall asleep in his lectures. Also he is very unapproachable, and his tests are very in depth and specific. Wouldnt recommend.

2.0
5.0
CHEM150
Grade: A
May 22, 2016

Thank goodness OWL is apart of the grade!!! The exams were horrible and hardly like owl and the practice exams. I found studying to be pointless since he would put stuff on there we hardly covered. Lectures are boring and long and find that most students will work on other stuff in class.

4.0
3.0
CHEM150
Oct 19, 2016
Would take again

Dr. Gallagher is a great professor and really knows what he is talking about. If you struggle with what you're learning, definitely go to office hours because he is more than willing to help you! Lectures can be long and drag on. Do the practice exams because those will really help you. The textbook is helpful if you are confused with concepts, etc

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Caring
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
CHEM150
Grade: B+
Nov 16, 2016
Would take again

He is a good professor, really organized and pretty detailed for the most part during lecture. Lectures are pretty boring but there is iClicker questions each day that will give you extra points at the end of the semester. OWL assignments due each week that aren't difficult. You can do well without reading the book. Exams are difficult but doable.

Respected
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
3.0
2.0
CHEM150
Grade: A
Apr 29, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Lecture is super boring. If you don't know the info already you'll probably end up reading the textbook for help. The OWLS are busywork but those and practice exams help on the actual tests. Clicker questions are the only reason I show up & he doesn't even click the right answer half the time. Overall, not super hard content, just the class sucks!

LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
CHEM150
May 8, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Worst professor I have ever had. Exams are nothing like his practice exams and his lectures are very boring. Be prepared to fall asleep in class and to teach everything to yourself. I will never take one of his classes again.

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
4.0
CHEM150
Grade: Not sure yet
May 10, 2017
Would take again

Dr. Gallagher is one of the best professors I have had, while I'll admit that his lectures are a bit dry at times, he is compassionate about the topic and very knowledgeable. If you do his practice exam and redo the homework assignments the tests are not that bad.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Caring
4.0
2.0
CHEM150
Grade: A
May 11, 2017
Would take again

Ok i have to admit his last test is really hard, but he makes up for it with a curve! His lectures can be long, but he answers any questions you need. Do the homework every week and do the practice exams!! Im not the smart and Im getting an A

Gives good feedback
Respected
Participation matters
2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Grade: C+
May 18, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He knows the content very well, but he has a very hard time conveying his ideas to the students so they can learn.

2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Grade: B
Jul 30, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He's clearly very intelligent and understands his topic well, but he has difficulty breaking it down to a level understandable by students. Test were HARD, his answer-key was not always even correct and the study guides often totally different from the exam. Lectures were boring but the clicker questions allowed for up to 1-2% extra credit

Respected
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
CHEM150
Grade: B
Aug 30, 2017
Wouldn't take again

When lecturing he speaks to the board and doesn't give you enough time to answer clicker questions. Most people watched Netflix during class because it got so boring. I didn't think his study guilds matched the material on the exams. DO NOT take him if you don't have to, have fun nursing majors!

2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Nov 16, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Gallagher is kind and cares about what he teaches, but his lectures are boring and long. He just reads the powerpoint that he puts on D2L, so going to lectures is pointless besides the clicker Qs, which he gives you 0.5 sec to answer. I didn't think his practice exams were ANYTHING like the actual exams. He's willing to help you during office hours

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 21, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Very quiet man and hard to hear. If you skip class you will not pass. You are graded on iClicker questions. Tests are heard and long. Was okay in the beginning of the class and then stropped explaining things.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
BIO150
Grade: C
Dec 24, 2018
Wouldn't take again

If you're not familiar with Ochem you will struggle with this class. Class is boring but it helped to print the notes and write along side them. Study guides were replicate of the tests, but he doesn't post all of the answers to them so it was difficult to know if you got the answer right.

Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
1.0
5.0
CHEM150
Grade: C
Mar 14, 2019
Wouldn't take again

If your a Nursing major, I would take this course somewhere else. Lectures are boring & long, so the only point of attending them is the clicker questions which he gives 0.5 seconds to answer. However, do the study guides; they help out on preparing for the exams.

Participation matters
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
CHEM150
Grade: B
May 13, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He's one of the most boring lecture profs ever. people fall asleep all the time in class. the exams are really hard, the class average was barely ever passing. really smart and nice guy, but he just does not lecture effectively

Lots of homework
Participation matters
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
CHEM150
May 19, 2019
Would take again

Do the study guides and practice exams and you will be okay on exams. Sometimes he throws curve balls on exams, but overall they are just like the study guides. Very knowledgeable professor, but you may need to get extra help learning the material.

Test heavy
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
CHEM150
Grade: B
May 21, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Lectures are extremely long and hard to pay attention to. You will need to read the book to learn everything because he doesn't explain anything well. Go to SI, and do the study guides, even though he does not post he full answer key. Try to take this class with another professor especially if you are a nursing major because it is hard to get an A.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
CHEM150
May 22, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He is obviously very knowledgeable about all the concepts but he has a really hard time breaking it down so that students can understand it. Content probably isn't actually that hard but he's very monotone and can't explain things the best. Seems like a caring professor who wants you to do well but could do better at conveying content to students

Get ready to read
2.0
4.0
CHEM150
Grade: B+
May 28, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He cares about his students but in order to do well you need to read and teach yourself a lot of the content. SI sessions help and so does going to the chem tutors periodically for the online homework. If you are a freshman don't buy a clicker from the bookstore, get it off amazon for cheaper.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Test heavy
Clear grading criteria
4.0
4.0
CHEM150
Grade: B
Jun 6, 2019
Would take again

If you're taking this class it's because you have to not want to. Not a terrible class but not the best, just because it was difficult. Online homework due about 1/2 times a week that can take a few hours but super helpful. Read the book. Show up to class. Study hard and you will do great.

Lots of homework
Caring
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
CHEM150
Jul 9, 2019
Wouldn't take again

"I do not believe in multiple choice exams" k. I paid UWEC to teach myself for this course. Go to SI, do the homework, show up to lecture for clicker questions, and do his study guides. Wait to take it with Yang in the fall. Your GPA and sanity aren't worth it. Good luck :)

Lots of homework
Test heavy
Tough grader
3.0
5.0
CHEM103
Sep 30, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Have him for chem 105. Tends to dive deep into the subjects that are easy to grasp and just glazes over the harder topics. Gives a boat load of online hw so be prepared. Chem tutoring and study guid will help. Make sure to do the practice OWL problems before the exam (there is a practice setting on owl).

Tough grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
3.0
5.0
CHEM105
Nov 11, 2019
Would take again

Willing to help!

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
2.0
4.0
CHEM105
Nov 18, 2019
Would take again

I have Prof. G for Chem 105 Lect. He goes into a lot of detail on the basics that everyone should know by now, but brushes off the more difficult problems. Easy points for participating in iClicker but unfortunately you have to pay for that AND OwL subscription. Lots of OwL hw. However, Study Guides for exams are very similar to the real thing.

Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
2.0
5.0
CHEM105
Dec 5, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I hated this class. He had amazing study guide and nice slides, but i was teaching myself. Half the time you cant hear lectures or see what he writes on the white board for examples. I can see how he would be good in an advanced chem course, but for an intro I didnt learn anything. Everyone just did hw during lectures and class doubled exam day..

Tough grader
Lots of homework
4.0
2.0
CHEM105
Grade: A
Dec 19, 2019
Would take again

He is so nice! Lots of online homework through OWL but the homework helps a lot. Uses Iclicker for attendance. Class lecture kinda useless. Posts overhead slides on canvas. His exams aren't too hard and his exams are exactly like the practice exams. the final was also super similar to his past exams.

3.0
4.0
CHEM105
Jan 7, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Gallagher is a good professor, but you don't want him for lower level classes. When covering our material during lectures, he would talk very briefly about what was expected on the test, and went into detail about things we didn't need to know (which he told us). He's too smart for low level classes and expects you to know the material already

Accessible outside class
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
CHEM105
Grade: B-
Mar 10, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Doesn't teach or give examples. Expects to just know stuff automatically. Talks in monotone voice

1.0
5.0
CHEM105
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
May 22, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Had to drop class during COVID-19. He doesnt even teach you. He expects you to know things yourself and takes in a monotone voice. There is so much owl hw and the exams are difficult! Cant wait to take chem 105 with anyone but him. DONT TAKE!!!! Switch to online was confusing and he wasnt willing to teach us.

Lots of homework
Tough grader
2.0
5.0
CHEM103
Aug 10, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Really had a tough time with him during lab, his lecture isn't that bad if you can stay awake and keep up on the homework. He talks for way too long during lab and over-explains everything. Get ready to spend the whole time in the lab. You only get out of the lab early if you cut corners or you're willing to do more homework.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
CHEM106
Grade: B-
Oct 25, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Grades everything for accuracy, good luck! I strongly disliked him. Doesnt respond to emails. Montone voice not interesting in helping.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
Tough grader
4.0
2.0
CHEM106
Grade: A-
Dec 14, 2020
Would take again

Super caring guy in my opinion, so I am shocked he has such a low score here. He would always help with any questions I had in lab, and his grading was quite generous. I had covid and missed 3 labs, and Professor Gallagher was very accommodating and genuinely cared about my health.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
1.0
5.0
CHEM352
Grade: B-
Dec 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Had to buy Mastering Chem: was glitchy, assignments didnt reflect lecture material. Lectures: sparse, learning expectations unclear. Normal course load crammed into way less lecture time due to social distancing. Exam difficulty varied by a lot, never knew what to study. HEAVY on graded HW, activities, quizzes that were extremely difficult.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
CHEM352
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Apr 7, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Take this course with a different professor if you can. His in-person exams are insanely difficult. Not sure how he is about partial credit. His lectures are extremely boring and uninformative. His homework assignments do not come from anything you will learn in the textbook or in lecture. You won't know how to study for any of the exams.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
CHEM352
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 19, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Gallagher is a nice guy and if you talk with him he is willing to help you learn but I would recommend not taking Biochem with him. I got an A in Orgo 2 and I have no idea what he is teaching half of the time. Super lecture heavy that doesn't line up with the book or mastering chemistry. He changed our online exam to in-person last minute too.

Lecture heavy
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

69%

Textbook Required

29%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 31 grades
Most common grades:
A (12)
B (6)
B+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(13)B(9)C(4)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(5)
Based on 36 reported grades
A: 12
B: 6
B+: 3
C: 3
Common Tags
Tough grader (10)
Skip class? You won't pass. (8)
Lecture heavy (8)
Lots of homework (8)
Test heavy (6)
LECTURE HEAVY (5)
Caring (4)
Respected (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.41 avg change
Mar
May
Aug
Oct
Dec
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHEM452

4.0

(2)

CHEM103

3.2

(15)

CHEM453

3.0

(1)

CHEM103LAB

2.8

(4)

CHEM150

2.6

(50)
+6 more courses
Difficulty by Course

CHEM150901

5.0

CHEM352

4.8

CHEM105

4.3

CHEM453

4.0

CHEM150

3.7

Similar Professors