2.4

William Archibald

English - Millersville University

2.4
Quality
3.1
Difficulty
19%
Would Retake
105
Reviews
2.4
Quality
3.1
Difficulty
2.6
Helpful
2.2
Clarity

19%

Would Retake

105

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

12

4

15

3

18

2

33

1

27

What Students Say

This guy is a terrible professor

ENG311 - 1.0 rating

Awful professor but a good guy

ENG311 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

82%

Textbook Required

47%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 16 grades
Most common grades:
A (4)
A- (3)
B+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(4)B(5)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(6)
Based on 19 reported grades
A: 4
A-: 3
B+: 3
B: 3
Common Tags
Participation matters (6)
Gives good feedback (5)
SO MANY PAPERS (5)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (5)
So many papers (4)
Tough Grader (3)
Tough grader (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.20 avg change
Jun
Oct
Dec
Jan
Jun
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

COS220

5.0

(1)

ENG

5.0

(1)

ENG100

5.0

(1)

ENGL000

5.0

(1)

ENGL274

5.0

(1)
+26 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENG472

5.0

ENGC1101

5.0

ADVCOMP

4.3

110

4.0

ADVNCDCOMP

4.0

Reviews (105)
3.0
2.0
ENG110
Nov 17, 2002

No Comments

1.0
3.0
ENG101
Nov 18, 2002

he's the worst english teacher i have ever had.

2.0
3.0
ENG110
Nov 19, 2002

Very confusing man who is not clear on what he wants...tough grader

5.0
1.0
ENG101
Nov 25, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
110
Dec 3, 2002

No Comments

4.0
3.0
WORKSHOP
Dec 7, 2002

In spite of these other comments, Archi is a GREAT professor! VERY intelligent!

2.0
1.0
ENG110
Dec 13, 2002

so easy

1.0
2.0
ENG110
Dec 13, 2002

No Comments

2.0
2.0
ENGL110
Dec 23, 2002

No Comments

3.0
4.0
ENG101
Dec 30, 2002

Very dedicated, intelligent & loves english but sometimes unclear & grades tough

3.0
3.0
ENG101
Jan 26, 2003

No Comments

2.0
4.0
ENG311
Jan 29, 2003

No Comments

3.0
1.0
ENG101
Mar 12, 2003

Archy was cool...he stutters a lot and isnt clear but he is nice

4.0
3.0
ENG110
Mar 16, 2003

Smart guy..not too bad of a class---stutters a lot...i am glad i had him for comp.

4.0
2.0
ENG110
Apr 8, 2003

If you go to him with your papers he will tell you what to change. Very very helpful. Sorta boring but what english class isn't?? I liked it

4.0
2.0
ENGCOMP
Apr 11, 2003

He is a great teacher and pretty easy as long as you keep up with all the work!!!

4.0
2.0
ENG110
Apr 13, 2003

once you get past the st-st-studdering, he is pretty good, not hard to get an A if you do the work.

5.0
4.0
311
May 13, 2003

Great Prof. & has a sense of humor when he gets over the shyness. Let him tell you about his life -- too cool. Tries to work with you and gets back to you if you contact him. Thanks, Archy.

3.0
1.0
ENG110
May 24, 2003

No Comments

5.0
1.0
COS220
Aug 26, 2003

I had Archibald for advanced writing. He was GREAT! Very helpful and willing to work with his students!

5.0
1.0
ENG
Aug 28, 2003

Awesome

1.0
4.0
ADVNCDCOMP
Oct 20, 2003

I hated him. He sucked sooooooooooo much. He was so liberal, he had a lisp and he was BORING as all hell!!!

2.0
3.0
ENGCOMP1
Oct 23, 2003

He starts out like he wants to help you out but all he does is say ten different things and you are expected to decide whihc one is right. he refused to grade a paper of mine. I do not think he like dme very much on top of it!...not cool

2.0
3.0
ENGL110
Nov 3, 2003

He seemed okay at first. But after that it went down hill. If you want someone who is clear with their thoughts and is capable of explaining those thoughts in a way that allows you to understand, don't take him!

4.0
2.0
ENG311
Nov 18, 2003

DR A you rule. I had you this summer and you were very compassionate, funny, and fair. You brought breakfast in for us...that was unexpected and appreciated. Awesome sarcastic sense of humor.

5.0
2.0
ENG100
Nov 23, 2003

Had him for Advanced Comp over the Summer...easy class! Super helpful too. Got back to you as soon as possible.

4.0
1.0
ENGL311
Nov 28, 2003

Not too bad. Grades pretty easily and the paper's aren't that difficult. Times when he was a little difficult to understand but just because he knew what he wanted to say but not how to say it. Hardest thing was staying awake from 6-9pm

4.0
2.0
ENGL110
Dec 6, 2003

A good teacher. One of the best english teachers I've had. Helps you with papers and the class is really easy.

2.0
3.0
ENG311
Dec 18, 2003

HORRIBLE< Don't take him, he is not a good teacher, all he cares about is himself, and he thinks he knows everything. I think he is **** and he is ****. HATED HIM!!!, but I still got an A because I earned it and I didn't kiss his butt.

3.0
2.0
ENG110
Dec 27, 2003

He grades really easy, do the papers and u will do well. Really hard to follow, studders A LOT. He's helpful though so overall not a bad teacher.

2.0
2.0
ENG110
Apr 13, 2004

VERY HARD to follow, but easy class, classes mean nothing since you are mainly graded on papers which have nothing to do with classes, overall not a bad guy

2.0
2.0
ENGLISHCO
Apr 28, 2004

He tends to jump around a lot and has a severe anger problem. Make him made and watch him studder. It's funny.

3.0
1.0
ENG110
May 3, 2004

He's a real nice guy, the class was really easy. The only thing is that he studders and its kinda annoying. But as long as you do your papers its an easy A.

1.0
4.0
ENGLISH
Jun 9, 2004

No Comments

2.0
5.0
ENG472
Aug 4, 2004

His topics were so far out in left field that I spent more time (and fellow classmates too) trying to decide what to write than actually writing the papers. Not easy to understand what he wanted to accomplish in the class. Grade inflater.

1.0
5.0
ADVCOMP
Oct 6, 2004

Quite simply my least favorite class at Millersville. Topics are far too vague and touchy-feely. My superior writing ability goes to waste in this class. He stands up there and fumbles around like an idiot.

3.0
2.0
ENG110
Oct 27, 2004

Very confusing when describing work.

1.0
4.0
ENG110
Nov 11, 2004

I never hated a professor before taking this class, and now I do. Made us write about the 60s so he, as an old hippy, could live vicariously through our papers. The assignments are worthless and he nitpicks on your writing, and not in a constructive manner.

1.0
4.0
ENG110
Nov 22, 2004

I hate this class, I hate this professor. Never take anything from him!!!!! How can such a huge idiot become a prefessor?!?!?!?

4.0
3.0
110ADVENG
Nov 26, 2004

Prof. A is just a really nice guy. He remembered my name all through my college career, and always said hi. His classes were a bit dry, but he was always there if you needed help. At times he was a bit difficult to follow, because of a stammer, but he really got me interested in good writing.

1.0
4.0
ENGL311
Jan 21, 2005

took it online and he never posted things in a timely manor

1.0
3.0
ENGLISH
Jan 28, 2005

He makes me doubt the entire Higher Education System. How this angry, bitter man has a job here (or anywhere) is beyond me. He is is simply the worst professor in the history of continues education.

1.0
4.0
ADVANCEDCOMP
Mar 4, 2005

Terrible teacher- do not take this class if you don't have to! His assignments are very confusing and the only input you get about your papers are when he smacks a grade and negative comments on them. If you have low self esteem, he'll make it lower..

1.0
5.0
ENGC1101
Mar 24, 2005

very boring class

1.0
2.0
ENG110
Apr 18, 2005

He has a problem speeking to the class he will studer very bad.

2.0
3.0
ENGLISH110
Apr 19, 2005

The guy has a Ph.D in English and PETA=PITA, quiz=quizz, many=meny according to him. He stutters, probably from continued drug use during his youth. He is an old hippie fixated on the 60s-its all you'll read/write on. Assigments are unclear, and useless. Avoid this Prof like the plague.

2.0
4.0
ENGLISH110
Apr 21, 2005

He is a horrible professor, should never teach, i dont think he actually knows how. he helps but only if u want to know where the writing center is. Stuck in the 60's, may actaully have althimers and be mentally stuck in the time period as well... look for someone else!!! thats all i can say

2.0
2.0
ENGL311
May 12, 2005

Took it online. bad idea. He's very disorganized. This might be an easy class in person, but his style is definitely not suited to online instruction. Two thumbs down.

2.0
2.0
ADVANCEDCOMP
Sep 2, 2005

Boring as hell. The stutter was annoying. He also told me that I was too young to write because I didn't have enough life experiences. He was really boring and I hated every minute in class, however, I was able to get an A from him. (Just make sure you

1.0
4.0
ENGLISH110
Oct 6, 2005

No Comments

1.0
4.0
ENGL311
Nov 17, 2005

Wow, he was emotionally offended by ALL of our essays on 2 out of 3 essays he assigned and hated them. It's impossible to figure out what he wants in your essays, and he is not afraid to give the whole class bad grades, even though he knows it's his fault (and admits it). The stutter is god awful, and he's rude to non-trad students.

4.0
2.0
ENG311
Jan 16, 2006

Took it online, during winter. Some strange writing, but easy to do. Reply promptly to discussion boards and will get a good grade, graded promptly, easy class, fair amount of work so take it during an easy semester, got nothing but As or A- in everything, if people did poorly it's because they didn't put enough effort into their writing

2.0
4.0
311
Feb 20, 2006

I'm taking it online now and I'm ready to KILL MYSELF. Totally disoragnized and unclear. Doesn't get back to questions promtly. I disagree with if you do the work you get an A and if not you didn't put effort it. I worked my ass off on the first essay and got a C. I'm just not a good writer, don't generalize that everyone is.

4.0
3.0
ADVCOMP
Mar 13, 2006

Excellent writing teacher. If you are incapable of abstract thought and bitter about it, don't take his class (from my experience, those who hated the class didn't really want to try). If you are intelligent, interested in writing, and want to make a potentially abysmal comp. class into a warm and creative experience, Archy's your man.

3.0
2.0
ADVANCECOMP
Apr 1, 2006

I took his class last spring (2005), and I thought he was average. The class was boring, but he did get me to come out in my writing, and quite frankly I think I needed that as far as creative writing goes. I think he was an alright prof, and for all of you illin' on his strutter...thats ignorant and rude...chill-out!

2.0
3.0
ENG311ONLINE
May 19, 2006

Very disorganized! He responds slowly to questions and takes forever to grade assignments. He even retro-posted announcements. Very stressful and annoying. All that said, I faired pretty well. Use caution!

3.0
4.0
ENGL311
Jun 15, 2006

I took this class online, and it was one of the most stressful months of my live. He's is very unclear in his directions, and if you ask him to clarify them, he just sends you back to the assignment sheet that confused you to begin with! I got a B+, but I worked my butt off for it.

1.0
5.0
ENG110
Nov 7, 2007

this is the absolute worst teacher i have ever had. he told me to drop out of college because i did bad on one test.

3.0
4.0
ENGL110
Dec 17, 2007

Do not take his class unless you absolutely have to! He told my whole class we're bad writers, and that we're not geniuses like Shakespeare or, get this, Marx! He's very unclear in his directions and only gives negative comments on your papers. Also, he's closed-mindedly stuck in his extremely liberal views.

2.0
2.0
ENGLI110
Feb 9, 2008

He was disorganized and unclear. He grades slow. I had to change my topic on my last essay several times merely because he did not like my topic. I passed the last essay with a B: half the class failed. There is something wrong if the class is not "average." Anyway, I found the class was generally frustrating.

2.0
4.0
ENG311
Aug 11, 2008

Boring lectures that often had little to do with the assignment. Grading system also seems bias. If he's personally interested in your topic, you'll receive a higher grade

5.0
1.0
ENG311
Aug 28, 2008

this guy is my hero i look up to him just like i look up to batman or george w bush

2.0
4.0
ENG101
Nov 19, 2008

He is one of the most mentally unstable professors in Millersville University. Somehow he is the chair to the English department. I will never forget the day he starting crying in class my freshman year. Also he tells you to write papers but is never clear on what exactly he wants you to write about.

2.0
5.0
ADVCOMP
Jan 12, 2009

DO NOT take him. I had him for online comp. and I had no free time at all. I worked constantly on assignments. When I e-mailed him for questions he acted as if my questions were a bother. I didn't even learn anything. It wasn't about how well you could write but how well you could comply with his writing style.

5.0
5.0
ENGL311
Jun 10, 2009

I just finished taking this class online. I like Dr. A. His class was hard. A semester full of writing condensed into four weeks kind of tells you ahead of time it is going to be hard. Dr. A is very honest in his feedback. He was easy to get in touch with and returned grades quickly. This class is not for those who want an easy grade.

2.0
2.0
ENGL110
Apr 9, 2010

Fits of stuttering and his staged sob session, disorganized with his assignments, bias towards certain students (seems to particularly favor females). Failed a large part of his class on the final paper. Upon discussing my paper with him, had the nerve to ask how "the hell" I was passing his course as if he expected me to fail entirely.

5.0
4.0
ENGL340
May 5, 2010

Dr. Archibald is a good professor. He usually teaches online classes, so if you have him for a regular class everything will most likely be online. Yes, he stutters, but it's not like he does it on purpose. Stuttering is something that some people can't help. I would definitely take a class with Dr. Archibald again, he knows what he's doing.

2.0
4.0
COMP100
Dec 13, 2010

Don't take his internet class. He doesn't teach you anything about the English language. You just spend all of you time learning useless software.

2.0
3.0
ENGL110
Dec 14, 2010

Professor is very unclear about what he expects of his students until after a rough draft is already completed and turned in. As long as you put forth effort, should be an easy class to pass, but it seems grading is fairly spotty. Attendance is mandatory but the lectures are meaningless.

5.0
3.0
ENGL000
May 10, 2011

Visual Rhetoric: I loved this class. Seems to me that the people who did well in this class were engaged and slightly older/more mature. I believe perhaps an immature student would have some challenges since they are "sometimes" more self-centered and don't have the life experience to pull into the discussions and asgnmts. Take if you like Art/Engl

5.0
5.0
ENG311
Jun 24, 2011

This class was very challenging, however... It was extremely well organized, prof was more than helpful and I learned a lot. Thank you, Dr. Archibald for a great class.

4.0
3.0
ENGL340
Mar 2, 2012

He is difficult to listen to, and the class material is very abstract, so you have to pay attention. It is very annoying because he relies entirely on online work. This class was spread over 4 different sites, and it got very irritating. The work load is manageable, and he is a very sweet man. I would take him again.

2.0
2.0
ENGL311
Apr 18, 2012

As long as you do the work and can turn out decently written papers, then you should do fine in the class. However, the professor's instruction is unclear and his revision comments are not helpful. It isn't a hard class, but I would recommend saving yourself the frustration and just taking it with another professor.

3.0
2.0
ENGL340
May 18, 2012

Archibald may be difficult to understand, but he genuinely cares. Talk to him, and he'll do what he can to help. Visual Rhetoric was one of my favorite classes because it was easy but flexible enough to let me be creative with assignments. I recommend taking it.

2.0
4.0
ENG311
Jun 5, 2012

GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN. He is not helpful. He only likes papers written his way. And honestly, I'm a good writer. I enjoy writing and reading, always have. But NOT this class. I definitely wish I wouldn't have taken him.

4.0
3.0
ENGL110
Dec 27, 2012

Engl Comp - This class was tough. I consider myself a good writer and enjoy it and this class really turned my whole world upside down. He showed us what made a paper OK and what made a paper out of this world good. He presses his students for out of this world good so be ready. As long as you do the work you'll get a B - Trust me ;)

1.0
5.0
ADVANCEDCOMP
Apr 8, 2013

Terrible professor. He is so mean!!! He talks and uses words that is way beyond our understanding and makes us redo papers, and tells us in a mean way. Meanest MU professor ever. I'm a good writer, but that doesn't matter. You have to write how he likes it.

1.0
5.0
ENG311
Apr 14, 2013

Don't take this course unless you are easily manipulated into writing stupid, pointless assignments while getting vague instructions from an idiot who writes on a third grade level. There is no point in taking this class unless you are ready to hate every aspect of writing.

1.0
5.0
ENGCOMP
Apr 24, 2014

Awful. Run while you can.

1.0
3.0
ENGL311
May 14, 2014

Easy to get a B in the class, as long as you do the assignments. However, he's not helpful or clear with what he wants. He'll always find things wrong with your writing, and will always be very vague on what he wants. The writing assignments were interesting, but his feedback isn't helpful.

3.0
3.0
MEMOIR
Nov 3, 2014

Be ready to use all of your printing allowances. Sure he stutters sometimes but he is still comprehensible. Just be patient with him and he will be patient with you. He is very sweet. However, he expect a lot out of your memoirs and sometimes he can be a little confusing but if you ask right away it will be fine.

2.0
4.0
ENGL110
Grade: A-
Apr 14, 2015

Although he seemed like a sweet man, he was extremely hard to listen to. His lectures are very long and boring and he is hard to understand due to a stutter. Normally a good student, but his assignments and directions are unclear. Took paper in for his review and made me redo the whole thing because he didn't care for the topic. Avoid if you can.

2.0
2.0
311
Apr 27, 2015

Attendance and small writing prompts are stupid and take up a lot of time. Archibald copy and pastes feedback on your papers and is rarely ever satisfied. If you revise your pointless paper to his feedback, you're pretty much guaranteed an A in the class, but it almost isn't worth the stress. Don't buy the book, readings can be found on google.

5.0
2.0
ENG311
Grade: A
May 14, 2016

Def. one of my fav. professors at MU! He's just amazing. Super sweet and seriously not hard to understand. Yes, he has a stutter but it's def. not as bad as some of these reviewers are making it out to be - you can understand him! He's always willing to help and give feedback and also is very supportive.

1.0
2.0
ENG110
Grade: B-
Jun 1, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Goes out of his way to attempt to fail students or give them a bad grade. If you do not follow his personal views then he will hate you regardless of the kind of person you are.

3.0
2.0
ENGL110
Grade: B+
Nov 11, 2016
Wouldn't take again

I wish he never took attendance because his lectures are pointless and you won't learn anything from him. His lectures are literally him telling you how to navigate his D2L page to start the next paper. His assignment descriptions are vague but not vague enough that you can't pass with ease. The papers you write are also pointless. Easy B+ or A

1.0
2.0
ENGL110
Grade: A
Dec 1, 2016
Wouldn't take again

He's a nice enough guy, but that's not enough to be a good professor. Often acts depressed and whines about how hard it is to deal with sad current events. Posts everything on google docs for you to read but reads it all to you anyway. Papers are graded on how well you revised according to his comments, which he gives without thoroughly reading.

3.0
3.0
ENG311ONLINE
Grade: A
Dec 15, 2016
Would take again

Archibald is very organized and everything is easily laid out for you online. He gives great feedback that helps better your writing. Sometimes his guidelines are incredibly difficult to understand and comprehend the first time. This course has 4 major papers and many discussions. You'll be reading essays and looking at them from a critical view.

Gives good feedback
SO MANY PAPERS
1.0
2.0
ENG110
Apr 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

I took Archibald's online ENG110 course. He is extremely unclear with what he wants besides his way or the highway. His directions don't make sense half the time. The format for the online course is confusing and you will always have a million tabs open. There were also multiple occasions where he was very rude over D2L or email. Never again.

Participation matters
2.0
3.0
ENGL242
Grade: B+
Apr 26, 2017
Wouldn't take again

This class was full of so many pretentious people, and Archibald was just insufferable most lectures. Ridiculous attendance policy (4 classes missed-dropped letter grade, 5 classes missed- automatic failed class) for a 2 time a week 430-515 class. I literally couldn't take anything out of this class because it was so ridiculous.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
3.0
3.0
ENG311ONLINE
Grade: B
Jun 23, 2017
Wouldn't take again

There's a learning curve to the way he organizes things but it's easy once you get it. There's lots of work, including a weekly paper and daily assignments. He's a bit vague on what he wants on his assignments and his feedback. If you revise them as he says, you'll do ell.

Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
SO MANY PAPERS
1.0
4.0
ENG311ONLINE
Grade: B-
Dec 26, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He is very vague in his explanations of assignments. Basically, be prepared to write a rough draft with little to no understanding of the prompt. He's very boring to listen to and rambles on and on in his screencasts. Also, be prepared to do four or five hours of homework each night of the course.

Gives good feedback
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
SO MANY PAPERS
4.0
3.0
ENG110
Feb 23, 2018
Would take again

Dr. Archibald is a good guy. The students who criticize him are the ones who don't like to write. Maybe this is a required course, and you don't like to write?? He gives feedback to students to help with their writing. He is paid to do that. FYI, that is why you are taking the course. To improve. I have learned much from his comments on my papers.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
1.0
4.0
ENG311
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Awful professor but a good guy. His classes are pointless and his explanations for assignments do not make any sense and gets frustrated when no one understands his instructions.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
1.0
3.0
ENG311
Apr 10, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This guy is a terrible professor. Hes constantly rambling about the most random things, and his classes have no structure. Hell pick your assignments apart for the smallest error, and its his way or nothing. Be prepared to fail if you dont completely parrot his ideas. I dont understand how hes even allowed to teach. DO NOT TAKE HOS CLASS!!

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
ENG311ONLINE
Grade: A-
Apr 23, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This was one of the hardest classes I've taken. If you're taking this because you think it will be an easy gen ed requirement, think again. Be prepared to put in the work to get a good grade. As long as you complete the assignments on time and review his feedback when you revise your papers, you'll do fine.

3.0
5.0
ENG311ONLINE
Grade: B
Jun 19, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I took Dr. Archibald's ENG311.50 online class for the Summer Session 1 2018. Overall, it was one of the most difficult classes I have ever taken. There were mandatory assignments every day for 4 weeks. The schedule included 1-2 papers a week on top of readings, peer editing, and discussion posts. I worked HARD and received a B.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
SO MANY PAPERS
2.0
3.0
ENGL110
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 16, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Archibald is a horrible professor. In class he just reads of his Google docs assignment pages, weekly reading response essays, essays about an essay that you're about to write (SRA), does not teach at all, can be rude at times, brings politics into class a lot, calls on you even if not raising hand. I highly do not recommend Dr. A.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
SO MANY PAPERS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
4.0
ENG101
Jan 16, 2019
Would take again

Dr. Archibald is the best. It's extremely difficult to give students, me one of them, good advice about how to improve their papers. He does! I think many students have a problem with that because they don't want to actually learn how to improve their writing. It's hard for us students to be critiqued, but that is what is needed.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
Caring
2.0
4.0
ENG110
Grade: B
Jun 25, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Archibald was very helpful when it came to how to reviewing papers. Although his class was very confusing when it came to assignments and his explanations were a bit dull. Get ready to write because his assignments require a lot of writing.

Gives good feedback
So many papers
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
ENG311ONLINE
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 2, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I have always been an excellent writer and love it, but this professor made me hate it. Literally no point to his lectures and always a thousand times more complicated than the assignment should be. His assignments, lectures, grading and emails are vague/unhelpful/rude. I never do ratings but do not take him. He is a good guy, pointless professor.

Lecture heavy
So many papers
Tough grader
5.0
2.0
ENGL274
Grade: A
Dec 11, 2019
Would take again

Dr. Archibald's class was a real asset to my writing. We learned a lot in class and he was also willing to meet with me outside class and help even further. He seems to care about his students and is inspired when our work sees improvement

Inspirational
Hilarious
Caring
2.0
4.0
ENG311ONLINE
Grade: C
Jan 20, 2020
Wouldn't take again

The extent of the feedback I received during this class was "needs revised". Thanks. On top of that he not only once, but twice gave me a failing grade on a paper for "not submitting a final draft". When emailing him about it, he admitted that the draft was there, and then ignored me. On the bright side, he gives out like 6 extra credit points.

Lots of homework
So many papers
1.0
4.0
ENG311
Grade: B+
Jun 22, 2020
Wouldn't take again

If you want to learn how to write more effectively this isn't your class. Instead, you'll learn to write the way Dr. Archibald prefers. Loads of busywork, little to no feedback, and the worst Google Docs experience you'll ever have. Turn things in on time, learn his preferences, and you'll get good grades.

Lots of homework
Participation matters
So many papers
2.0
4.0
ADVANCEDCOMP
Grade: A-
Nov 26, 2022

His organization strategy is questionable at best. Good luck navigating the maze he's created through Google docs. He always looks for something very specific in the assignments he gives. He taught me that there is some secret writing rule where it's unprofessional to use adjectives. Still feels like a fever dream. Take someone else if you can.

Tough grader
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

82%

Textbook Required

47%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 16 grades
Most common grades:
A (4)
A- (3)
B+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(4)B(5)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(6)
Based on 19 reported grades
A: 4
A-: 3
B+: 3
B: 3
Common Tags
Participation matters (6)
Gives good feedback (5)
SO MANY PAPERS (5)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (5)
So many papers (4)
Tough Grader (3)
Tough grader (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.20 avg change
Jun
Oct
Dec
Jan
Jun
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

COS220

5.0

(1)

ENG

5.0

(1)

ENG100

5.0

(1)

ENGL000

5.0

(1)

ENGL274

5.0

(1)
+26 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENG472

5.0

ENGC1101

5.0

ADVCOMP

4.3

110

4.0

ADVNCDCOMP

4.0

Similar Professors