3.5

William Russ Payne

Philosophy - Bellevue College

3.5
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
58%
Would Retake
103
Reviews
3.5
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
3.7
Helpful
3.4
Clarity

58%

Would Retake

103

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

34

4

29

3

21

2

10

1

9

What Students Say

Hard grader for online work

PHIL101 - 2.0 rating

See the RMP page for "Russ Payne"

PHIL101 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

40%

Textbook Required

43%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 22 grades
Most common grades:
A (9)
A- (5)
Not sure yet (3)
Grade Distribution
A(9)B(3)C(3)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 25 reported grades
A: 9
A-: 5
Not sure yet: 3
B: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (12)
Gives good feedback (6)
Participation matters (4)
Lots of homework (4)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
Clear grading criteria (2)
Amazing lectures (2)
So many papers (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.72 avg change
Nov
Jun
Nov
Feb
Mar
Jul
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL269

5.0

(1)

PHIL235

5.0

(1)

PHILO160

4.5

(2)

PHIL102

4.3

(4)

PHIL120

4.2

(5)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

IDS135

5.0

PHIL375

4.2

PHILO160

3.5

PHIL106

3.5

PHIL122

3.5

Reviews (103)
2.0
4.0
PHIL265
Nov 7, 2004

Never writes anything on board. 2.5 hours of him *talking* is not *teaching*. His last comment to me, after asking for help, was "It's no skin off my nose if you drop this class."

3.0
3.0
160
Nov 7, 2004

Boring class

4.0
2.0
PHIL160
Nov 12, 2004

No Comments

5.0
4.0
PHIL265
Nov 18, 2004

This instructor really knows his stuff. Sometimes loses me but can follow questions from students well. I really learned alot and would recommend him to anyone.

3.0
3.0
PHIL265
Feb 28, 2005

No Comments

2.0
3.0
PHIL265
Mar 8, 2005

The teacher talks too much about personal stuff. But overall, he is OK.

3.0
2.0
PHIL160
Mar 14, 2005

It is very easy to do well in his class because all of his notes are online and he provides you with the test questions almost a week ahead of time. Just study really hard for a few days, to make sure you can answer the test questions, and the rest of the class is pointless.

3.0
3.0
PHIL160
Mar 24, 2005

Some say payne is a pain, but I thought he was excellent. He does like to talk a lot, but that is how philosophy classes work.

5.0
3.0
PHIL100
Mar 25, 2005

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHIL100
May 12, 2005

Russ is fantastic. He goes over alot of heads, but that's cause most heads are empty and low. If you're actually interested in philosophy, he'll get you thinking. If not, take it with somebody else and don't waste his time.

2.0
3.0
PHIL260
Jun 2, 2005

Thid is such a boring class. He just goes in and talks about random things. No structure. Avoid and pick another elective.

5.0
1.0
PHIL100
Jun 13, 2005

Really nice teacher, and was helpful and clear, I would reccomend him.

4.0
4.0
PHIL100
Jul 11, 2005

A good teacher, but very random lectures. He is also pretty easy going, I don't think I really understood the material but I still recieved a B in this class. If you can focus well in class I would recommend him, if not try to find a teacher who has a more set form to their lectures. Overall, I learned a lot and he was a nice teacher.

3.0
4.0
PHIL100
Jul 19, 2005

Interesting class. I enjoyed the class but wish Russ structured it better. I did the reading but couldn't not get A's on his tests. I was confused on what he wanted for an answer. I think he treats the class as maybe a 200 level and not an INTRO to PHIL but that's just me.

3.0
1.0
PHIL160
Jul 19, 2005

Interesting class. Be prepared to talk ALOT about whatever random issue comes up. No homework, tests are graded 3.2 across the board, regardless of what you write. Don't even bother buying the book. You never use it and neither does he. In all, more like a discussion forum than a class, but a guaranteed B if thats what you're looking for.

4.0
2.0
PHIL100
Jul 31, 2005

He is a good professor. He can get boring at times during his lecture and you can easily get lost on what he's talking about if you don't pay attention. You don't get any homework, which is good. Didn't use the book much, but he'll tell you some of the stuff he'll ask you on exams.

4.0
2.0
PHILOSOPHY160
Sep 1, 2005

Class was ok, but if you don't afree with him, he's quite a jerk. If you have any religious views, stay away, he'll harp on you all the time. VERY opinionated!

2.0
4.0
PHIL100
Oct 17, 2005

He is kind of close minded towards God and religon and can be over my head but good class

3.0
2.0
INTROTOPHIL
Grade: A
Oct 20, 2005

No Comments

5.0
3.0
PHIL265
Nov 12, 2005

Really nice guy and helpful teacher. The subject is philosophy so it's not the easiest thing in the world, but still he makes it very interesting and lets the whole class participate.

2.0
2.0
PHIL100
Nov 16, 2005

Loves the sound of his own voice like a worm loves dirt. Ask him a question, and after 20 mins of rambling, YOU won't even remember what you asked him. No homework, but has very poorly defined standards for what constitutes a "good" answer on his tests. No individual or unique thought required -- just read the book and regurgitate infromation.

3.0
3.0
PHILO100
Nov 17, 2005

Left wing professor. Bashes religion and Bush and is very 1 sided. Likes to ramble on and on in his lectures. Very hard to follow along. No homework but he is very particular on his test answers. Class is pointless stick with teaching yourself from the book.

3.0
3.0
PHILO100
Nov 27, 2005

Intersting stuff but really confusing! He is nice and trys to help out students. If you read the book you will do fine.

4.0
2.0
PHILVARIETY
Mar 13, 2006

Payne is great, but don't take his classes in the earlier mornings, his voice and rambles will send you straight to sleep. Loves to talk talk talk about everything and nothing, but is very intelligent and philosophically minded. Tends to talk over beginner's heads, so if you're new to philosophy stick with someone else. Lots of discussion.

4.0
2.0
PHIL120
Mar 22, 2006

I aced his class without reading the book. I also did about 70% of the homework. I felt his explanations in class were clear and easy to understand. Often goes off on interesting rants. some people had problems understanding him. I don't know why. Only complaint was he had 2 quizes, 1 exam, 1 final so if you messed on one you could get a bad grade.

5.0
3.0
PHIL269
May 2, 2006

Great teacher! Quite intellegent and completely understanding. As a running start student in my junior year of high school, the 200 level philosophy class was managable and at the same time quite interesting! I highly reccomend Mr. Payne for any of his classes!

4.0
1.0
PHIL160
May 11, 2006

Russ is a good prof. I wish more classes were like his. If u like phil., the manner in which he designed the course allows for a lot of concept absorption time. There is no mad rush in trying to complete assignments bcuz little work is assigned. Rather, you have time to actually read and contemplate, allowing one to get their mind around the info.

5.0
2.0
PHIL120
Nov 22, 2006

I really liked him - easy-going, laid-back, not a stickler for the homework, though it was crucial to understanding the material. He made me love the subject even more (Intro to Logic). Really, really liked the class, and Russ. I want to take a class from him every quarter.

5.0
2.0
PHIL265
Nov 26, 2006

Russ works as hard to help you succeed as you are willing to work.

4.0
2.0
PHIL160
Dec 11, 2006

His main flaw is that he falls off track of the material we should be covering in class. He's very patient with students who don't understand, and amazingly patient with students who are absurdly argumenative. Read the exam questions ahead of time (on his site) so you can ask questions before. If you do this, you should do well. Very nice professor

3.0
3.0
PHIL265
Dec 11, 2006

I didnt like this class. It was hard to stay alert and understand what the point was.

5.0
3.0
PHIL120
Mar 22, 2008

Russ was an awesome teacher! He has such clear and easy ways of explaining things and progresses along with the material at a very reasonable rate. He's funny and makes class interesting too. You will have to work hard- read the book and do the homework. But he grades fairly and overall is a lot of fun. :)

5.0
2.0
PHIL160
Mar 24, 2008

I'm in running start, and I loved this class. The only problem with Russ is that he's almost TOO smart, so sometimes it's kind of hard to understand his complex vocabulary. The tests are all easy. He's really nice, laid-back, and willing to help during office hours. Cool first time PHIL class, cool teacher.. very small workload.

5.0
1.0
PHIL160
Mar 24, 2008

cool dude

3.0
1.0
PHIL265
Mar 30, 2008

This is a very easy professor. However, his lecture is super boring and totally wasting time. Wanna an easy A in med ethnic class, then take Dr. Payne.

4.0
4.0
PHILO160
Jun 15, 2008

great person but very diffucult to keep him on track he ventures off on other topics a lot, DONT purchase the book you dont need it at all he puts everything you need online.

4.0
1.0
PHIL160
Aug 3, 2008

Russ is always ready to provide out of class help if you have any questions. I found his class a great intro. into the world of phil. It's true that he often went off on tangents. Which sometimes got to be irritating, but mostly just interesting. Great teacher, recommend the class. Oh, and DO NOT buy the book. Total waste.

4.0
3.0
PHIL265
Dec 7, 2008

An easy A, reads right out of notes and textbooks, mostly lectures takes no attendance but if u dont show up u will fail, very hard to get a hold of for individual questions and can get carried away with offtopics overall great teacher!

5.0
2.0
PHIL160
Dec 17, 2008

Very good instructor and very knowledgeable. He puts all the material you need on his website, so don't buy the book. He had everyone assemble in small groups to study for exams and that helped out tremendously. His final exams require a lot of writing so be prepared.

3.0
4.0
PHIL160
Mar 2, 2009

-no particular interest in philosophy, - no prior education in philosophy. I took Philosophy of Science because it fit my agenda. He doesn't give much work HOWEVER when he did i felt unprepared. He lectures non-stop in a Squidwardesque voice. My biggest issue was i didnt understand a SINGLE thing he was saying, I would need a PHD to understand him.

5.0
2.0
PHIL120
Mar 18, 2009

The most influential teacher I have yet taken. Very patent and helpful with everyone making a plesant in and out of class experience learning the material.

4.0
4.0
PHIL265
Mar 26, 2009

I took this class online. We can ask questions in the discussion board; and Russ responded quickly. Russ required us to participate in the discussion board; and it affects your grade! However, I sometimes felt frustrated that I didn't know the standard of "fully participated".

3.0
3.0
PHIL265
Jun 18, 2009

I took this on campus and found Russ to be an easy teacher. The material can be confusing if you don't know or are interested in Philosophy but if you look over the readings (even the night before the exam) it's fine. He does not post notes to all the reading so you need the book for this class. I snoozed through most of the quarter and did great.

4.0
4.0
PHIL106
Nov 17, 2009

He's so helpful, he's really there for the students. He does go on rambling about many things that was often confusing, but overall he's great!!

3.0
4.0
PHIL160
Nov 18, 2009

Best philosophy teacher out there!

5.0
2.0
PHIL160
Nov 24, 2009

Stick with this class....its worth it.

5.0
2.0
PHIL160
Nov 24, 2009

Very helpful and he wants you to understand the content.

5.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 20, 2009

Really enjoyed this class. May be tough out of the gate, but well worth it. Just stick with it....it gets easier. Has a great sence of humor.

3.0
5.0
PHIL160
Dec 25, 2009

Payne was a interesting instructor. He has alot of knowledge within his field but sometimes it can be hard for him to stay on track with what hes talking about. I have never taken Philosophy so this was my first time taking this class and it was tough...But he is a good instructor and he will be willing to HELP if you ask for help.

5.0
3.0
PHIL101
Feb 19, 2010

Very passionate about teaching, education, critical thinking, and philosophy; shows in his lectures. Occasionally gets off topic worth it when he does. It's not the easiest class, and he expects thinking, but he makes his students WANT to learn. *A lot* of reading involved, most of the learning is from self discipline. But over all amazing prof.

5.0
3.0
PHIL106
May 18, 2010

Prof. Payne makes logic (a topic that can, at first, be confusing) become clear. To begin with he may seem a little intimidating, and the beginning lectures are fast, but hang in there - it gets WAY better! He's willing to help. :)Rent the book from the bookstore - way cheaper. Lots o' truth tables/comp q's on first few tests. 4 tests - 1/chap.

5.0
3.0
PHILO160
Jun 4, 2010

Philo of Science. Loved the class. Lectures were a little confusing because it's philosophy but it that's your thing, you're good. Payne makes it fun. Ask him to tell you stories, he's got good ones. :D Read the book and answer the review Qs before tests for practice and you'll be fine. I got an A.

4.0
4.0
PHIL265
Jun 19, 2010

Lectures are interesting and relevant. All info for class is on his website. Lots of readings - and they can be a bit tedious - but he explains them well in class. Tests are essays, he posts questions on his website at beginning of quarter. Good experience and easy if you put in the effort and have a brain.

2.0
5.0
PHIL106
Jun 28, 2010

Not a fan. I had heard a lot of great things about this prof but I wasn't impressed. His "grading" is incomprehensible, again I was just not a fan.

5.0
2.0
PHIL106
Aug 5, 2010

Russ is super friendly and helpful. His grading is more on a case by case basis which much more appropriate for a philosophy class than the more traditional black and white grading methods. He takes homework and test scores into account as well as improvement and time spent seeking extra help.

3.0
1.0
PHIL265
Dec 8, 2010

This guy can't stay on topic to save his life. It took a full third of the quarter to get to anything related to the "biomedical" part of ethics. Way too much philosophy in this class for my taste. If you have any conservative leanings keep your opinions to yourself, absorb what you need to, spit it back on the tests and retrieve your A. Silly.

5.0
2.0
PHIL160
Dec 12, 2010

The best professor I've had in my life. Prof. Payne is helpful, understanding, and interesting. I even screwed up and missed the time of the final; I went to his office afterward and he just smiled and asked "ready to take the test?" He has a sense of compassion as well as a learned intellectual. Take this class if you want to learn something.

5.0
1.0
PHIL160
Feb 4, 2011

Really cool guy, class was fun. The other kids in the class suck butt. You don't need to try and impress this teacher so just shut up and listen.

5.0
2.0
PHIL235
Mar 8, 2011

I took his class last year. This teacher is great! He cares about the students and really tries to make us understand that subject! He is definitely one of my most favorite professors of all time!

2.0
5.0
PHIL101
Nov 5, 2011

Useless Teacher. Hard grader for online work. Gives quizzes with very vague answers and questions. His study questions are also hard to understand then docks you down for not doing them correctly.

5.0
1.0
PHIL101
Nov 28, 2011

Great professor! The class was mainly lectured based, but its interesting and he knows what he is talking about. If you put in the effort, getting an A shoudnt be a problem!

4.0
2.0
PHIL101
Nov 29, 2011

Very eloquent and willing to share his knowledge of Philosophy. Very honest too! I thought he was fair at grading. Sometimes lectures though were hard to follow, but only if you hadn't read the material. Overall a great teacher.

4.0
2.0
PHIL101
Nov 30, 2011

Professor Payne is awesome. I went into PHIL 101 with no idea of what to expect and was pleasantly surprised by how interesting philosophy is. He didn't use a textbook for the Fall quarter class as he was trying new curriculum. The class is largely based on interactive lectures.

5.0
2.0
PHIL102
Dec 14, 2011

The material itself can be pretty confusing, but Mr. Payne is incredibly patient and will give you thorough explanations to any questions you might have. You can tell he's passionate about what he teaches. Super nice guy!

4.0
2.0
PHIL102
Feb 16, 2012

Russ single-handely took over the position of my favorite teacher after his class. He is humorous, but that is because he is honest. The class is lecture based. He assigns readings for homework, but lectures on them the day after, which can be somewhat anti-productive. He is willing to adapt for the class with when things are due. Great profe

4.0
3.0
PHIL101
May 26, 2012

Took the course online- no textbook, all material posted. Lots of reading, so pace accordingly. Participation is key, and don't be afraid to speak your mind. Nevertheless, participation from others was very low. Regret not putting more time towards this course. Lots of reading material; actually understanding it helps keep enthusiasm alive.

3.0
3.0
PHIL101
Feb 20, 2013

I was really excited to take this class but he kind of made it hard to enjoy. I would be really confident on a paper I've turned in and receive back a horrible score. I really tried in this class but I definitely did not get an A for effort..or a B. I would've taken this class with another teacher versus online had i known how it would have been.

4.0
2.0
PHIL101
Feb 28, 2013

Great great professor. However, the online exams are kind of strange. I don't know if that can be blamed on him, but some of the answers are so alike it's hard to tell which one is right-- even if you have a decent understanding of the course material. There are also several spelling mistakes which will throw you off. Regardless, he's great.

4.0
3.0
PHIL101
Mar 27, 2013

Great Professor. Keep involved, take the time to read the articles provided and engage in the discussions. He's extremely helpful and its obvious that he wants you to succeed. Show interest in the subject and you'll do fine.

5.0
2.0
PHIL101
Apr 4, 2013

Was awesome. Favorite teacher in BC. Made philosophy easier than it looks like.

5.0
1.0
PHIL101
Aug 16, 2013

Great guy, Great teacher

1.0
5.0
IDS135
Jul 17, 2014

DO NOT TAKE A CLASS WITH HIM! Although he is a really nice guy, he is a bad teacher. The only reason I did well in this class is because there was another teacher with us! If it weren't for her I would have gotten and F. He is very unclear and can never answers your questions, he just goes onto another topic when trying to. He is a terrible grader.

1.0
5.0
IDS135
Grade: A-
Jul 17, 2014

DO NOT TAKE A CLASS WITH HIM! Although he is a really nice guy, he is a bad teacher. The only reason I did well in this class is because there was another teacher with us! If it weren't for her I would have gotten and F. He is very unclear and can never answers your questions, he just goes onto another topic when trying to. He is a terrible grader.

5.0
4.0
PHIL122
Aug 11, 2014

Great teacher. He is knowledgeable in philosophy and is great at helping students find passion for logic and critical thinking. Russ enjoys lecture and class discussion. He encourages full class participation and creates a very safe place to discuss ideas. He uses a variety of text as well, so be prepared to read and write a lot. Loved this class!

3.0
3.0
PHIL122
Grade: A-
Aug 31, 2015

He was a really great teacher but some of the material that he wrote was hard to read and quite dense. Over all I really enjoyed him as a teacher.

3.0
4.0
PHIL102
Grade: C+
May 12, 2016

I would not advise anyone to take this class, I have taken many classes at BC (including calculus) but this class is honestly the worst one I have taken. The entire period he talks, no visuals, no writing, just a lecture about stuff that sometimes doesn't even pertain to the topic. The readings that are assigned are very hard to follow.

1.0
5.0
PHIL101
Grade: C-
May 24, 2016

I've had some bad teachers but he has to be the worst. The class is averaging c's and D's on discussions, tests, and assignments. He doesn't have a textbook, he uses his own wording which is THE most confusing wording I've ever seen in my life. I have no idea what he's trying to say, ever. He also expects way too much of students.

4.0
4.0
PHIL101
Grade: B
May 27, 2016
Would take again

Philosophy is a hard class to take in general, Russ makes this very clear at the beginning of the quarter however; he works through it with you every step of the way. He answers any questions you have, (even if silly) and is very understanding. The class is very reading heavy, but he is a fair grader, and you get the grade you work for!

4.0
4.0
PHIL101
Grade: B-
May 27, 2016
Would take again

Professor Payne is a thoughtful teacher and this course is very well thought out. I've learned a lot and would say to other students, if you can you should take this class! It's very useful and interesting.

4.0
3.0
PHIL101
Grade: A-
May 28, 2016
Would take again

Online class has required discussions, which are good and bad. Good because he can elaborate to help you understand. Bad because there's a ton of reading weeks 5-8 and it's hard to understand it by Monday (if you work fulltime or have heavy classload). Good feedback on all assignments, clear course goals and structured workload.

3.0
4.0
PHIL101
Grade: C
May 30, 2016
Wouldn't take again

He doesn't use a text book, just his own lectures and some articles. His lectures are very poorly edited and he tends to ramble... can be hard to follow, which makes the assignment hard to complete. But he answers questions in a timely manner and understands that the material is difficult. He is willing to explain and has always been available.

4.0
4.0
PHIL101
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 3, 2016
Would take again

Challenging work. Knowledgeable. If you work hard in this class you'll learn a lot.

4.0
3.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Jun 16, 2016
Would take again

Prof. Payne's lectures can be difficult to follow at times, mostly likely to myself spacing out. I felt as the class went on through the quarter lectures became easier to understand though. No book is nice. Make sure you do ALL the assignments to get an A due to having no major grades at the end to boost your grade. Forgiving w/ late work.

1.0
4.0
PHIL101
Apr 17, 2017
Wouldn't take again

For an online class entirely too much reading in a short time period. Near 70 pages of reading along with essay and questions to be done in two days. Many discussions appear to be designed to show how smart the prof is, and not be useful to discussion. May be great in person, but avoid online.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
4.0
PHIL101
Grade: Not sure yet
May 12, 2017
Wouldn't take again

I took this class online, and Beware, All of his notes/lecture make no sense. It is all in philosophy terms/speak so It makes it very difficult to even read a sentence and attempt to understand what it means. Take in class and he seems like he would be a good teacher.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Jan 11, 2019
Would take again

Really interesting and rewarding class. Online class composed of readings he wrote followed by a short quiz and a mandatory discussion. Beware: you must post on multiple days to gain full credit. Sometimes, there is a small assignment for readings. He responds to posts frequently and is lenient for late work. Easier standard for an A instead of A-!

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
PHIL102
Grade: A
Mar 22, 2019
Would take again

Entire class is basically reading and in class discussions. The readings are pretty interesting but they can be slightly long. Assignments are minimal and midterm/final are written in class. Lectures can be boring but if you actually listen he's extremely knowledgable and genuinely cares about his students knowing the material. Easy A if you try.

Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
Caring
5.0
3.0
PHIL101
Apr 2, 2019
Would take again

William Payne is William Russell Payne and he goes by Russ Payne. See the RMP page for "Russ Payne". The students commenting here don't even know their professor's name. Not surprising the reviews are poor.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
PHIL101
Grade: B+
Apr 4, 2019
Would take again

Solid teacher quite knowledgeable, I generally like philosophy so for me it was interesting class I would continue taking more classes with this professor.

2.0
4.0
PHIL375
Oct 5, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I'm taking his online section of PHIL 375 and let me tell you, this class is just plain brutal. As others have mentioned, he doesn't use a textbook, he prefers to write his own lectures which are long and confusing. It's just not good writing, that's the bottom line. He uses the excuse that the material is difficult. Yeah, sure. Avoid.

Get ready to read
So many papers
Tough grader
1.0
3.0
PHIL101
Grade: B
Nov 22, 2019
Wouldn't take again

While there isn't a textbook, Russ likes to use his writings to get across his viewpoints. The readings are confusing and hard to understand, I had to watch youtube videos to understand anything. His lectures were long with no visuals or any writing on a whiteboard if you don't learn from just reading don't take this class. Don't take his class.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
PHIL375
Grade: A-
Dec 10, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Probably the worst teacher i have had. Makes you post 4 discussion post on separate days every week. He grades them like he doesn't read the papers. If you turn in garbage you will get a decent grade. So its not worth putting in work. Avoid at all costs.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
5.0
3.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Dec 28, 2020
Would take again

Loved this professor! The optional zoom meetings were a lot of fun and I learned a lot from them. No textbook. Everything we had to read, he wrote himself. I recommend taking notes on the readings he posted. There is a discussion board which is supposed to be like a classroom, to ask/answer questions and talk about the chapter/ what you learned :)

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
3.0
5.0
PHIL101
Feb 22, 2021
Would take again

All texts are written by him, his grammar is awful and the readings can be hard to understand. I found the content to be very interesting but had to go too outsider sources often. Weekly readings, quizzes, optional lives, and sometimes papers, no big projects or exams. He grades fairly but his quizzes can be challenging for an entry level class.

1.0
5.0
PHIL375
Jan 14, 2022
Wouldn't take again

I have taken other Phil classes before, this course needs no books, you gill get a couple of pages very confusing, boring book without any concepts on it. After you have discussions, of course not to learn or share knowledge, and quizzes, exceptionally hard confusing questions and you must be fast like 2+24, if you focus in reading may miss all.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
PHIL375
Grade: A
Mar 7, 2022

No instruction. Hours reading boring papers, online "discussion", & writing essays. There is a 4 essay midterm. Final project is a highly involved research paper requiring 10-20 sources, annotated bibliography, rough draft... More like upper level English class. Learned nothing about philosophy. Expect to spend (waste) 20+ hours/week.

Lots of homework
So many papers
4.0
5.0
PHIL375
Apr 2, 2022
Wouldn't take again

He was pretty chill but his assignments required a lot of reading which made it really annoying.

Gives good feedback
Lots of homework
Get ready to read
1.0
3.0
PHIL375
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 2, 2022

This teacher does not provide any help at all. Responds to emails 2 days later. So much reading every week with multiple discussion per week. There's also a huge research project essay that he provides absolutely no guideline or sources to help. You're literally on your own for this class.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Jun 12, 2024
Would take again

I was very shocked to see that Professor Payne had a rating of 3.6 on RateMyProfessor. He is at minimum a 5 in my book, very clear and easy standards, actually cares about interacting with student discussions, quizzes are straightforward if you are up to date with the readings (they are easy), and he is flexible. Overall I really enjoyed his class.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
5.0
4.0
PHIL101
Grade: A-
Nov 5, 2024
Would take again

The best class I've ever taken. His lectures are incredibly well written and made hard philosophical concepts easy to understand. While there is a steep initial learning curve and a ton of reading and writing, he made philosophy incredibly fun and enjoyable. He genuinely cares about his students and will provide consistent feedback in discussions.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
4.0
3.0
PHIL101
Grade: B+
Feb 3, 2025
Would take again

Russ is a solid professor who makes philosophy engaging. While his readings can be challenging, the optional Zoom sessions really help clarify the material. For study prep, Unstuck study and the discussion board were lifesavers.

2.0
2.0
PHIL120
Grade: A
Mar 13, 2025

Chill guy. Overall, he is nice, and I think he is a good teacher in class. However, I was bewildered by how bad he was at grading. He will reply to emails weeks after I sent them. He was available after class for a zoom meeting, but only if you contacted him like two weeks in advance. Also, he gave NO info abt the final until the week before. crazy

4.0
1.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Jul 24, 2025
Would take again

Very easygoing and passionate instructor. You are expected to read the textbook on your own, for his lectures are mainly him simply talking (60% related to the subject, 40% going on a tangent). Easy grader and gives great feedback. Simple assignments

Amazing lectures
Gives good feedback
Graded by few things
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

40%

Textbook Required

43%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 22 grades
Most common grades:
A (9)
A- (5)
Not sure yet (3)
Grade Distribution
A(9)B(3)C(3)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 25 reported grades
A: 9
A-: 5
Not sure yet: 3
B: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (12)
Gives good feedback (6)
Participation matters (4)
Lots of homework (4)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
Clear grading criteria (2)
Amazing lectures (2)
So many papers (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.72 avg change
Nov
Jun
Nov
Feb
Mar
Jul
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL269

5.0

(1)

PHIL235

5.0

(1)

PHILO160

4.5

(2)

PHIL102

4.3

(4)

PHIL120

4.2

(5)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

IDS135

5.0

PHIL375

4.2

PHILO160

3.5

PHIL106

3.5

PHIL122

3.5

Similar Professors