3.3

William Spruiell

English - Central Michigan University

3.3
Quality
2.8
Difficulty
34%
Would Retake
90
Reviews
3.3
Quality
2.8
Difficulty
3.5
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

34%

Would Retake

90

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

25

4

26

3

16

2

11

1

12

What Students Say

Nice guy, kind of quirky

ENG175 - 4.0 rating

He was a great teacher

ENG175 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

48%

Textbook Required

43%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 22 grades
Most common grades:
A- (7)
A (7)
Not sure yet (4)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(4)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(9)
Based on 28 reported grades
A-: 7
A: 7
Not sure yet: 4
B: 2
Common Tags
Lecture heavy (12)
Tough grader (8)
Graded by few things (7)
Gives good feedback (6)
Get ready to read (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
So many papers (3)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.84 avg change
Oct
Dec
Jan
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENG530

5.0

(1)

SEVERALEN

5.0

(1)

ENG531

5.0

(1)

ENGLISH323

5.0

(1)

ENG674

5.0

(2)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENG375

5.0

ENG530

4.0

ENG175WI

3.3

ENG271

3.2

ENGLISH323

3.0

Reviews (90)
5.0
2.0
ENG175
Feb 26, 2002

You'll learn a lot of neat stuff about language in this course. Great lecturer!

2.0
3.0
ENG175
Aug 29, 2002

Most boring Prof. Ive ever had..couldn't last a half hour w/o leaving

5.0
4.0
ENG530
Sep 3, 2002

HATE THE WAY HE DRESSES, BUT HE'S AN EXCELLENT PROF! TAKE HIM IF YOU WANT

2.0
3.0
ENG371
Sep 6, 2002

long winded & boring with points for effort.

5.0
4.0
ENG175
Nov 14, 2002

Hilarious guy, very smart linguist, fun fun class who cares about how he dresses

5.0
1.0
SEVERALEN
Nov 19, 2002

Funny guy, clear lectures, don't know why anyone complains- I got A's

5.0
2.0
ENG570
Dec 2, 2002

Interesting Prof. Really funny. I learned a lot from him!

5.0
2.0
ENG371
Dec 6, 2002

He makes a grammar course about as fun as its going to be

3.0
3.0
ENG175
Dec 7, 2002

Never sure what he was saying. His class was brain sucking.

4.0
3.0
ENG371
Feb 9, 2003

Odd, odd man.

5.0
3.0
ENG570
Mar 4, 2003

Great professor - very interesting to listen to.

5.0
1.0
ENG531
Apr 21, 2003

Brilliant, hilarious, and energetic prof. HIs tests are a bit odd, but he is definitely a reason for taking a class. Anyone who thinks he is boring is either lazy or is just not trying.

5.0
2.0
ENG323
Apr 30, 2003

cool guy, makes you think. not a hard class, just do the reading. quizzes are easy. tests arent bad. good prof- take him!

4.0
2.0
ENG175
Oct 14, 2003

the class is boring but he made it as interesting as you can make linguistics. Funny stories and examples. Tests are open book.

5.0
1.0
ENG371
Nov 16, 2003

Spruill is cool! I never liked any other teacher who was into linguistics..but he is great! He is really helpful, and very clear on what he expects. I give Bill an A !

4.0
2.0
ENG175
Dec 8, 2003

good teacher. linguistics is boring but his stories are good examples and are interesting.

5.0
3.0
ENG371
Dec 9, 2003

Self-proclaimed nerd. Isn't very clear on everything, but he realizes that and will stop class to try and make it even clearer. Realizes grammar is boring, tries to make it as interesting as possible. For some reason, likes foreign names like Bjorn.

4.0
2.0
ENG371
Dec 9, 2003

He is a decent prof. His test are open book. His lectures are a little confuseing. Half the class had no clue what was going on, but he trys. It's grammar: it's hard to make that fun.

3.0
4.0
ENG175
Feb 18, 2004

The class was boring and his tests were pretty hard. If he does not agree with your wording in your papers you are kinda screwed. The final exam was rediculous.

4.0
2.0
ANT175
Mar 1, 2004

Bill's a cool guy, kinda nerdy but he's a fun guy. His tests seem to be alright, not too difficult, all are open book open note. He gives quizes almost every class period which kinda sucks, especially if you read and you don't remember what you read.

4.0
2.0
ENG175
Apr 6, 2004

nice guy - always happy. he will drag on and on. but the tests are all open book! he is fair to slightly difficult in grading. will give an attendance quiz almost every class. gives appropriate examples.

5.0
1.0
ENG371
Apr 11, 2004

this guy is pretty easy. spell check will be your best friend! tests are open book so take good notes... you will need them!!! all tests are cumulative so dont drink away everything from last chapter!

5.0
2.0
ENG175
Apr 14, 2004

I LOVE this class (sue me, I'm and ENG major). I recommend Bill to anyone who takes this class. Take good notes and stay awake in class due to the open note/open book tests and you'll be fine. The papers are interesting to write as well.

4.0
2.0
ENG175
Apr 21, 2004

Bill understands that linguistics is a boring subject in nature. He tries very hard to make it interesting and applicable. Tests are open book/note but are still hard as hell and should be studied for. If you have to take this class definitely go with him

4.0
2.0
ENG175
Apr 30, 2004

Hella boring, but if you take good notes the tests are easy. The papers were pretty easy as well. open book, open note. Don't leave his class early or he get's pissy. quizes every day suck, but you can deal with missing a few days.

4.0
2.0
175
May 4, 2004

take good notes!! his tests are open book open notes, but they are hard and he gives quizzes over the reading everytime, but they are not hard at all!!! i recommend him!!

4.0
3.0
ENG175
Jun 1, 2004

This is the most random class and professor! He's kind of interesting to listen to but is all over the place. His grading is a little weird. His accent is fun though! Tests are open book/note--thank God for that! Overall an okay class and professor.

3.0
4.0
ENG175
Jul 8, 2004

This class was a complete waste of my time. He spent the majority of the course talking about his life int he south and the other half making impossible tests and paper topics. He is also never available to help during office hours.

4.0
2.0
ENG
Aug 9, 2004

Good teacher, interesting class. The course work is not "impossible"--I didn't meet anyone that got below a B on any paper or test--and the course was somewhat fun.

5.0
3.0
ENGLISH323
Feb 1, 2005

I am glad I took sci-fi/fantasy with him...he's so enthusiastic about it! It's a lot of reading and not an easy A, but you learn a lot and he makes the lcass fun. I never had any problem with him being at his office during hours, and he is always willing to help students.

5.0
2.0
ENG175
Mar 29, 2005

Fun guy...lectures can be pretty boring and draggy, but he mixes it up with some southern humor and personal anecdotes. Take notes, bring your book to class, as you can use them on tests and quizzes.

2.0
4.0
ENG175
Apr 13, 2005

This class was a waste of time. I didn't understand anything and the tests were on little things that really didnt matter to what we were learning. His projects were impossible and he is a very hard grader. DO NOT TAK THIS CLASS IF HE IS YOU TEACHER!!

2.0
3.0
ENG271
Dec 17, 2005

Wow, is all I can say about this guy. Don't take the Grammar class with him--just don't do it. He will make you want to shoot yourself after 15 minutes of listening to him ramble and try to make jokes. He is a good guy, and seems knowledgeable..BUT THIS IS NOT the class to take with him. He makes grammar look 800,000 times worse than it already is.

5.0
2.0
ENG271
Dec 25, 2005

Grammar isn't a very exciting topic in the first place, so don't expect this to be an exciting class. I thought Spruiell did a fine job and made it as interesting as it could be. I would recommend this class with him as the professor.

4.0
2.0
ENG175
Mar 22, 2006

The exams and papers are very reasonable. He does hold you to the very last minute every class, so don't think you'll ever leave early. He gets off topic frequently, but overall the class is interesting. He can be funny sometimes with his southern humor as well.

4.0
3.0
ENG175
Apr 21, 2006

He has a great personality, he's really friendly, and funny, and tries to make the subject intersting. Still, the lectures are kind of dull. The tests are open book and open note. There are only three papers, so that isn't bad.

3.0
3.0
ENG175
Apr 25, 2006

This class is way confusing, the subject that is. He is a very nice guy, very scatter brained and very unorganized, but nice. Class is very hard to understand though.

5.0
2.0
ENG674
Apr 26, 2006

Yes, he's a little scattered, but with some prodding he'll set dates and nail down details. He's a great teacher, and he's absolutely hilarious in a very goofy way. He comes highly recommended. He's abundantly helpful and super smart.

3.0
2.0
ENGLISH175
May 2, 2006

He is a nice guy, although this is the most boring class I've ever taken. Completely unorganized, takes over a month to grade tests/papers. Keeps you until the end of the period and then some. Sort of annoying...easy class though.

4.0
2.0
ENG175
May 5, 2006

Nice guy...super boring class. Very unorganized, takes about a month to get tests/papers back. You need the book..open book/note tests, but they are still hard. 3 research papers...never lets you out early at all.

4.0
3.0
ENG175
May 18, 2006

I like him, but his class was very hard! Tests were open book/open note but he talked about so much material you will miss somethings. Go to his class, sometimes they are boring but if you don't go you will miss important material. He is pretty funny and even though his material is boring he is rather animated. I like him.

4.0
3.0
ENG175
Oct 30, 2006

doing well in class is quite easy, sitting through it is sometimes hard. tests (open notes/book) are ridiculously easy if you just listen and have okay notes. is amusing guy but sometimes gets sidetracked and that gets annoying. overall not too bad.

3.0
2.0
ENG271
Dec 27, 2006

He was really funny and amusing, but the subject was very hard to stay awake through. If he hadn't tried so hard to spice things up with humor, I'm not sure anyone would have been awake by the end of class. He doesn't keep grades posted, and is a little unorganized, but other than that a he's a good teacher. Try to never, ever, take modern grammar.

4.0
3.0
ENG175
Mar 14, 2007

Nice guy, kind of quirky. Makes the boring material at least a little interesting. Open to questions, always asks if everyone understands the material. Southern acent that he tries to cover up makes him fun to listen to- not your average boring lecture. VERY FUNNY, if you like dumb puns, etc. Would take another course taught by him.

5.0
2.0
ENG175
May 15, 2008

He was a great teacher. Very funny, his stories make the information more interesting. He will go over things until you get them. Take him if you can, I am going to try to take him again for another class.

3.0
4.0
ENG271
Apr 23, 2009

If you're going to take this class, DO NOT take it with him. He tries to be funny and he is, but it doesn't help with the subject matter. He is not clear when he speaks and you just sit there confused. Going to class is essential if you're going to try and understand the lectures. I never thought grammar could be so confusing.

3.0
2.0
ENG201
Jan 11, 2010

Most boring teacher I've ever had. He talks about absolutely nothing for the last 45 minutes of each day, dragging on and on. Only five papers but he gives the most vague direction. However we had practically no due dates with chances to rewrite assignments. Grades easy. Take at your own risk. Nice but boring.

3.0
3.0
ENG271
Sep 22, 2010

Very nice guy, but extremely boring and abstract. He is a bit disorganized and the class work got more confusing and his help got more vague. Very approachable guy, but can be a bit confusing at times.

1.0
4.0
ENG175
May 1, 2011

I can't stand this guy. My original prof got sick halfway through the semester and he took over. I now hate this class he is so unorganized and just rambles on about nothing. Trying to study for my finals are impossible seeing as I have no notes. Such a waste of my time and money. Not happy.

4.0
1.0
ENG570
Jul 26, 2011

Dr. Spruiell can be boring at times but he is a really great professor. He cares about the students and whether or not they're understanding the material. His assignments may be unclear at times (and the lack of syllabus doesn't help matters) but he allows for rewrites, even on final papers. If you attend class and participate you'll be fine.

4.0
3.0
ENG577
Dec 9, 2011

Dr. Spruiell is a really nice guy and is willing to come in for office hours whenever you need him for help, but I often left class feeling confused about vague assignment instructions and very disorganized lectures. What was most frustrating was the fact that I liked the guy so much but disliked his teaching style and the class. Bummer.

5.0
2.0
ENG577
Apr 29, 2012

Dr. Spruiell is amazing. One of the most intelligent professors I've had at CMU. Could probably teach most of the ENG classes, along with history, statistics, etc. His classes are a lot of lecture, but he makes them hilarious and interesting so it's like story-time. I took his Old English class for fun and I learned a ton. It was a blast.

4.0
3.0
ENG577
Aug 9, 2012

I have had Dr. Spruiell for 2 classes so far. I wouldn't say he is the best professor, but that may be because the class was 7-9:50pm on Thursday nights. He is a really nice guy, but basically will just talk about the subject with a few things written on the board. His lectures are more stream of consciousness than a structured lesson.

1.0
3.0
ENG371
Dec 11, 2012

Worst professor I have ever had. Material was not difficult, but never followed the textbook. His lectures were not helpful and simply linguistic rants, as opposed to teaching about grammar. He had students present for 2.5 months, and we never got feedback. Most useless and frustrating class I have ever attended.

4.0
1.0
ENG323
Apr 2, 2013

Dr. Spruiell is amazing! Even if his lectures are boring to some (I didn't think they were) it's still easy to pass his tests. Not very many assignments, and he's a lenient grader. Highly recommend him to anyone passionate about Sci-Fi and Fantasy, he really knows what he's talking about. LONG LIVE BILL SPRUIELL!

3.0
3.0
ENG323
Jan 14, 2015

Dr. Spruiell is a really nice guy but not the greatest lecturer. He never seemed to have a lesson plan and just winged it. The course is very interesting and discussions can be fun but sometimes run overlong and get far off topic. Assignments are fairly straight forward as he even gives a full outline for text analysis which are 20% of final grade.

1.0
5.0
ENG375
Mar 23, 2015

Seems like a great guy, however I have not come into or left class with an understanding of what I did on the homework. He has not lectured on the homework until the day it is due, and then he most likely won't get through it all in the time we have left.

5.0
1.0
ENG675
Jun 4, 2015

Dr. Spruiell is very honest and knows what he is doing. He is very knowledgeable, too.

4.0
3.0
ENG577
Grade: A-
Dec 22, 2015

super nice professor and super honest best teacher in the CMU, I strongly recommended him,

1.0
5.0
ENG175
Grade: C-
Apr 27, 2016

Although he is a nice person, he cannot teach well at all. He is not clear during lectures and often rambles on about things that aren't relevant. He grades papers very tough and is vague when giving feedback. I have yet to leave class knowing what we even talked about that day.

5.0
3.0
ENG201
Grade: A-
May 9, 2016

I went to every class. In a class of 25+ only 5-7 kids showed up. There are in class essays that you need to be there for, however they are preassigned. He is a very nice guy, but his voice is so monotone sometimes I would just go to class to clear my head-no joke. DO NOT BUY THE BOOKS. I wasted so much money you don't even need them. Easy class.

5.0
3.0
ENG323
Grade: A+
Oct 8, 2016
Would take again

Really funny, nice, approachable. Little weird and kooky but great. You have to read and come to class, he does daily miniquizzes - not hard, just attendance/proof you read. He's very knowledgeable and will share a lot of cool info. But easily sidetracked. Average-above average difficulty on grading, but he's compassionate. Great outside cl

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
1.0
4.0
ENG175WI
Oct 26, 2016
Wouldn't take again

This is the worst professor I have ever had at CMU. He rambles during lecture and hardly talks about material that is relevant to exams. His exams are really difficult, too. He makes it really hard to get an A, and only gives out A's on papers if your paper is original. He is also very quirky.

3.0
3.0
ENG271
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2016
Would take again

Didn't make a schedule for the class so it was unclear what exactly we were doing each week. Exercises at the end of each chapter from the textbook are so confusing, and when he goes over it in class, his answers/interpretation of the questions are so much easier. If you skip class, you won't know what the tests are over. He's nice though.

Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
4.0
ENG175
Jan 3, 2017
Wouldn't take again

This professor is quirky. He grades pretty harsh and was not helpful in office hours. I went to his office hours for papers a couple of times and still ended up with Bs at best, and that was with his advice. His exams are tricky and he rambles in lecture about things irrelevant to the course.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
1.0
2.0
ENG175WI
Grade: B
Jan 11, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He is very nice and clearly knows a lot about the subject, however, he does not teach well at all. Lectures were long and boring, and he often rambled on about things that were irrelevant. Although there was minimal work for the class (readings were short and only a few short papers for a WI), I would avoid taking the class if possible.

4.0
3.0
ENG175
Grade: B+
Mar 22, 2017
Would take again

I liked his class. Sometimes he goes on tangents in his lectures, but they are always interesting. The class is lecture heavy, so be prepared to take a lot of notes.

BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
ENG271
Apr 20, 2017
Wouldn't take again

In ENG 271, there is a homework assignment each week but the text book he uses for them is terrible and makes no sense. His lectures are long and boring, and he loves to mention that we all look bored while never stimulating us with anything interesting to say. I really like him as a person, he's definitely knowledgable, but not a great professor.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
4.0
ENG577
Grade: A
Jan 24, 2018
Would take again

This is one of the smartest teachers I've ever had. I think, though, that he only gets to teach English classes if he can relate it to Linguistics, so he puts a linguistics lecture in every class, which is confusing. If you're not into linguistics, ignore it; it's not on the test.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
2.0
4.0
ENG201
Grade: B-
Apr 18, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I had Bill for ENG 201 at night from 6:30-9:20... it was honestly the worst mistake I have made. He talks all of class about pointless stuff. He is a great guy just not a good teacher. He told us on our final week of class that we have a presentation that he has never told us anything about. Don't take this class. Take it with a different professor

Tough Grader
SO MANY PAPERS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
ENG201
Grade: B-
May 21, 2018
Would take again

I really fell behind on my papers and thought I would have to drop the class. When final grades came in I received a B-. This teacher is awesome, he will work with you and he takes late work sometimes for full credit. i really recommend you take this course with Will. He will help you through the course and you will pass it if you work with him.

Gives good feedback
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
ENG674
Grade: A-
Jul 29, 2018
Would take again

amaaaaazing teacher

1.0
4.0
ENG271
Mar 28, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Bill is a good guy. He really is, but this is the second time I have had to take his class because if he doesn't think you're putting in 100% he will fail you. He does not explain himself very well and when you try to ask him questions he only makes it more confusing. He's a really great guy, but he just needs to work on his teaching.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
4.0
ENG175
Grade: Rather not say
May 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

He seemed like a nice guy, but was a horrible teacher. I had so many issues getting through to him, as in sending him three e-mails before receiving one response. May I also add his e-mail was sent back two weeks later. So unempathetic.

Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
2.0
4.0
ENG175WI
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Nov 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I was not a fan of this professor. I struggled with content and had a hard time completing the assignments because he didn't take time in class to explain a few of them. I have never struggled in an English class before this class. Be prepared.

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
Lots of homework
3.0
4.0
ENG201
Grade: A
Dec 22, 2021
Wouldn't take again

If you can, I would recommend taking a different professor. The whole class was out of 100 points, and he only gives As on papers he thinks are special. If you aren't great at writing or are used to passing English classes easily, he isn't the professor for you. He does give several opportunities for revisions though, so that's nice.

Gives good feedback
So many papers
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
ENG201
Grade: A-
Dec 8, 2022

He is a linguistics prof teaching a composition class. He never posts the prompts or directions to the papers, and rarely answers emails with helpful answers. When turning papers in for a first draft, he will grade it as if it were a final draft. he will only give B's and above if he is truly astounded by the paper. There's always something to fix.

Tough grader
Group projects
Gives good feedback
1.0
4.0
ENG175WI
Grade: B
Dec 13, 2022

It is a linguistics class with very heavy lectures. He is also a very tough grader and only gives out As for papers that he thinks are very special. There are very few points given in this class so it is easy to get a bad grade and fall behind. If I could take this class with another professor I definitely would. My whole class was always confused.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
2.0
ENG201
Grade: A-
Jan 23, 2023
Would take again

Professor Spruiell taught ENG 201 very well. He is very friendly and wants to help his students as much as possible. I enjoyed taking his course as he made sure we knew what was expected, and was flexible with deadlines. However, I found the lectures not as imperative to my learning as I already knew most of the rules in English writing.

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
Inspirational
3.0
4.0
ENG175WI
Grade: A-
Dec 4, 2023

Lectures were extremely off topic and distracted. Usually found that it had little to no connection with what we were doing in class. Very little teaching in that way. He is an awesome guy but the teaching lacked. Papers were only given A's if you went above above and beyond. Little feedback. Class dragged on and tests were difficult- curved.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
2.0
4.0
ENG175WI
Grade: A
Dec 13, 2023

nice guy, but an awful professor. basically just talked at the class for the entire semester, and it was impossible to keep up as he never stayed on topic. no one in my class every knew what was going on, and the entire class would fail every exam so badly that there was a huge curve. linguistics is hard, and this class made it impossible.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
ENG201
Grade: B+
Oct 17, 2024
Would take again

Overall he is a professor who is looking for improvement. He only has a single submission for the final drafts of the papers, which at first is daunting. After a few weeks he returns the paper for revision with notes. You are able to submit these papers revised until a final date. Very catered towards academic writing and nit picky.

Tough grader
Gives good feedback
So many papers
2.0
2.0
ENG175WI
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 7, 2024

As someone who isn't even interested in Linguistics, this class felt like it dragged on for hours. Professor Spruiell is a funny guy, but not the best professor. Every class was a lecture that often had no topic and useless information. He also did not follow the syllabus, rarely posted the homework he said he'd assign, and never graded essays.

Lecture heavy
2.0
3.0
ENG175WI
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 14, 2024

Funny guy, scatterbrained to hell and back. Lectures were kind of directionless and due dates where just, whenever he felt like it. He would say he would upload assignments on a certain day and then it wouldn't be sent out until almost a week or so later (did this with the final exam too). I liked the topic and I still wouldn't take the class again

Lecture heavy
4.0
4.0
ENG175WI
Grade: A
Jan 1, 2025
Would take again

The best way to describe this class was interesting but disorganized. His lectures were intriguing but all over the place. If you can get past the lecture disorganization and focus on writing concisely (don't use “too fancy” language) you'll do fine. He gets a bad wrap, which I get, but you can tell he genuinely cares and understands linguistics

Lecture heavy
3.0
2.0
ENG175WI
Grade: A
Jan 6, 2025
Would take again

For each exam you also had to write a short essay. Exams were online. Lectures were slideshows, very boring, but the prof himself he's a very nice guy. He really cares and is passionate about what he teaches.

So many papers
Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
ENG201
Grade: A-
Apr 29, 2025

The lectures are hard to sit through, and I wish there was better clarification of what the papers were really about. You will not get an A on your paper unless he thinks it is extraordinary, and will not give you feedback on your papers to get your grade past a B. 80% of your grade is based off your 3 papers.

Tough grader
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
ENG175
Grade: A
Nov 4, 2025

I don't understand what I was supposed to have learned from that class. The lectures were SOOOO disorganized (Let's talk about this picture of a tree I found online today) and I don't think he even knew what he was supposed to be talking about. The assignments were interesting- I did enjoy them, but sitting through his classes were torture.

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
ENG271
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 17, 2025

The grammar class I took with him was very confusing and I don't think I learned a single thing. The final was extremely stressful and he ended up curving it heavily because everyone did so bad. Would not recommend.

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
ENG271
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 17, 2025

Seems like a good guy, but I still would walk into oncoming traffic rather than take this class again. This class was pretty confusing, and I had to turn in like half the final blank because I didn't know what was happening. I do think he knows a lot about this subject and seemed somewhat excited to teach it.

Lecture heavy
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

48%

Textbook Required

43%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 22 grades
Most common grades:
A- (7)
A (7)
Not sure yet (4)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(4)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(9)
Based on 28 reported grades
A-: 7
A: 7
Not sure yet: 4
B: 2
Common Tags
Lecture heavy (12)
Tough grader (8)
Graded by few things (7)
Gives good feedback (6)
Get ready to read (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
So many papers (3)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.84 avg change
Oct
Dec
Jan
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENG530

5.0

(1)

SEVERALEN

5.0

(1)

ENG531

5.0

(1)

ENGLISH323

5.0

(1)

ENG674

5.0

(2)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENG375

5.0

ENG530

4.0

ENG175WI

3.3

ENG271

3.2

ENGLISH323

3.0

Similar Professors