2.5

Zeev Maoz

Political Science - University of California Davis

2.5
Quality
4.2
Difficulty
33%
Would Retake
98
Reviews
2.5
Quality
4.2
Difficulty
2.4
Helpful
2.6
Clarity

33%

Would Retake

98

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

8

4

20

3

25

2

19

1

26

What Students Say

“Bad at responding to emails”

POL136 - 2.0 rating

“Never take this Professor he and his TA are lazy and rude”

POL136 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

23%

Textbook Required

29%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

89% confidence
Based on 13 grades
Most common grades:
A- (5)
A+ (2)
A (2)
Grade Distribution
A(4)B(2)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(6)
Based on 15 reported grades
A-: 5
A+: 2
A: 2
B: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (8)
Graded by few things (7)
Lecture heavy (5)
Respected (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
Participation matters (2)
Test heavy (2)
Tough grader (2)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.29 avg change
May
Dec
Feb
Oct
Feb
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PS0003

5.0

(1)

129

4.0

(1)

136

4.0

(2)

IREH

4.0

(1)

POL135

3.4

(10)
+9 more courses
Difficulty by Course

POLIT3

5.0

POL144

5.0

POL190

4.5

POL3

4.4

POL129

4.3

Reviews (98)
3.0
4.0
POL
Feb 9, 2005

good lecturer, tons of reading

4.0
4.0
POL129
Feb 20, 2005

Great professor, his tests were a bit broad, lots of reading

3.0
4.0
POL190
Mar 16, 2005

Tons of reading assigned, very dry lecturer, gives no clear direction on how he wants the paper written, overall nice guy, but not a great prof

5.0
4.0
POL129
Mar 30, 2005

Great prof! Yes, lots of reading. Great if tiring lectures (the room made people sleepy). Maoz is great. He gives you the midterm/final scheme he will use. Tough paper.

5.0
2.0
POL129
Mar 30, 2005

Man Zeev OWNS all the noobs. He is like the Patrick Ewing of Political Science. His class is great, interesting, and filled with happy feelings all the time. I highly recommend Maoz (aka Mo' azz) for those into international relations. West side!

4.0
2.0
129
Apr 10, 2005

So far as easiness, it's only hard if you're not interested in the subject matter; I didn't buy any of the books, went to all the lectures, and pulled an A-. Lectures are critical. He's a big shot and he knows it...so his lectures are very concrete. If you're looking for a filler upper div, skip it.

2.0
3.0
POL129
Jul 29, 2005

boring lecture!!! Thank God I care enough about the subject to not have to depend on any enhusiasm.

1.0
5.0
POL3
Jan 16, 2006

he is SO BORING when he lectures. and his wordart? not impressive.

1.0
5.0
POL3
Jan 17, 2006

No Comments

1.0
5.0
POL003
Feb 10, 2006

If you're thinking about taking this class.....don't. If you've already signed up for it, locate a closet, and hang yourself in it. Boring lectures, hard tests, the guy is a ****.

1.0
5.0
POL3
Feb 11, 2006

AWFUL!!! worst professor at DAVIS!!! it upsets me that i pay his salary!! BORINGGGGG and horrible teacher.

3.0
5.0
POL3
Feb 14, 2006

The man knows what he's talking about, but his teaching style is non-interactive and boring. He expects A LOT for a lower division introductory class. If you take this class and work your ass off, you will KNOW IR and kick butt in any further IR classes. If you don't really care about knowing IR, take this with some other teacher if you can.

1.0
5.0
POL3
Feb 17, 2006

he expects way to much for a lower division introductory poli sci class. Both pol1 with hill and pol2 with andrews were all easy a's and now I'm barely pulling a c...WTF? He needs to stick to researching and not ever go around a student. He has by far the worst lecturing skills known to man. I wish I didn't have to pay his salary.

1.0
5.0
POL3
Feb 20, 2006

my cat could do a better job teaching! horrible class, midterm average was a 60ish and maoz won't curve it!! oh P.S. in his class: 100-93=Aish, 93-83=Bish, 83-73=Cish and so on...1 word to sum up: RIDICULOUS!!!

1.0
5.0
POL3
Feb 25, 2006

your better off standing on the downtown train tracks than sitting through this class with maoz!! AVIOD him at all costs!! waiting one extra quarter to take this class with another professor will DEFINITLY be worth it!!! Excessive reading, awful lectures, unreasonable uncurved tests...who ever said money can by a good degree??

2.0
5.0
POL190
Mar 3, 2006

This man is utterly incompetant. I had a family emergency and ended up no taking the class. I turned in NO work, and instead of receiving a NS(No work submitted I got an F) I swears I took the Midterm and got a B, listen I WISH, this man is off the deep end, some of my friends stuck around and they had the HARDEST time. RIDICULOUS! STAY AWAY!

1.0
5.0
POL003
Mar 21, 2006

No Comments

3.0
5.0
POL3
Mar 23, 2006

Very hard class with a lot of reading and hard tests, but it weeds out the people who shouldn't be in Poli Sci, no not much to complain about.

3.0
5.0
POL3
Mar 25, 2006

Very hard class. Hard tests, no curve. Do not take for fun because it will just lower your GPA.

1.0
5.0
POL003
Mar 26, 2006

Awful, Absolutely awful. His class is almost impossible. THe class average was 60 yet he wont curve it. I was in top 10% of class mathematically and got a straight B. Its ridiculous how bad this guy was as a teacher. IR is one of the most interesting subjects in POlySci, yet he makes it miserable. Avoid at all costs. Trust me.

1.0
5.0
POL3
Mar 27, 2006

Unfair and Impossible.

3.0
4.0
POL003
Mar 28, 2006

This professor is a terrible lecturer, but that isn't my only criticism. I did well on the tests, but they were unreasonably hard for a lower division IR class. Excessive reading, nearly half of the course reading was not utilized for any exam. Bottom Line: Don't expect any easy grade in this course, or clear lectures.

2.0
4.0
POL003
Mar 29, 2006

Although the subject is interesting, I didn't like this class. The lectures were rather bland. This by no means is an easy class. The average was a 60-ish on the midterm, and he wouldn't curve it. The highest grade for his class as a whole was a B+. It's way too intense for an intro class. Too much reading too. Take this class with someone else.

1.0
5.0
POL003
Apr 2, 2006

This guy is smart but he does not know how to teach! The average grade in the class was a low D borderline F and he did not even curve eventhough the average obviously shows how much the students did not understand his teachings. If you want to get kicked out of Davis by having a D or an F on your transcript, be my guest and take this class.

2.0
4.0
POL129
Apr 3, 2006

Maoz is tough. I would NOT recommend this class for anyone as a first course in upper division political science. He defintely knows his stuff and thats as far as it goes...

4.0
5.0
POL003
Jun 16, 2006

The poster below is incorrect -- I got an A- in this class. But everything else he/she says is true. I liked him, and am looking foward to another class with him, but I understand why others didn't like him. It depends on how you work.

4.0
3.0
POL003
Jun 19, 2006

Maoz's class is not as difficult as everyone says it is. It is an intro class but it's also a weeder class. Just get into the reading, pay attention during lecture (seems hard but with some caffeine it's not so bad), and follow his slides. If you go to class it's not bad at all. I pulled off an A- and even slacked a bit at the end.

1.0
5.0
POLIT3
Sep 20, 2006

horrible instructor...i could not understand a word he said!

1.0
5.0
POL129
Oct 6, 2006

papers were graded harshly, midterms were difficult, and it was hard just trying to understand him. the class average was a C-/D so that shows how ridiculous his teaching style is

4.0
5.0
POL129
Dec 9, 2006

Arab-Israeli conflict -- hardest class I've ever taken. I have always been one of the top two in my poli sci classes, but I will be happy if I manage a B in this class. Sooo much information, so complex, and the paper is so demanding. He's an expert in the field, which is awesome. We're not, but I kind of feel like he expects us to be...sheesh.

1.0
5.0
POL003
Dec 24, 2006

Maoz is apparently the head of poli sci department. Personally, when I was taking his class, he seems like he didn't care about his lower div class, ie. POL 3. TA's wrote the exams for him. The final was rediculously hard with a big portion of current events that you would not know how to study for. Oh, and He emphasized a lot on middle east issues

3.0
4.0
POL003
Jan 13, 2007

His tests aren't easy and his POL3 class involves a lot of reading but if you like Poli Sci/IR its not so bad. Tough class but well worth it

2.0
5.0
POL003
Apr 1, 2007

An extremely difficult teacher. He has terrible public speaking skills, and a voice that lulls you to unconsciousness while remaining wholly unsoothing. The discussion sections were useless, and although attendance was required, you received no points. The final focused on current events that are difficult to study for. Avoid his class.

3.0
1.0
POL3
Apr 9, 2007

Take him if your are interested in political science, if you are not a poli-sci major and you are looking for a filler class, I suggest looking for a different class. Lots of reading, but the reading is not everything, I suggest reviewing online notes prior to exams.

4.0
3.0
POL3
Jun 21, 2007

Pretty good teacher, really knows the material. The accent is not hard to get used to or to understand. If you read and study the tests aren't too hard. His lectures may not be the most riveting you will ever have, but you should definitely go.

1.0
5.0
POL003
Aug 8, 2007

Zeev Maoz is the most useless professor I've ever met, EVER. He's so difficult to work with and is thoroughly UNWILLING to help and almost impossible to get a hold of outside of class, even wtih office hours. He's the kind of professor who wants students to fail. He knows his stuff and is very smart, but I recommend a less frustrating professor.

1.0
5.0
POL129
Feb 11, 2008

Lectures are very boring and the midterm review was absolutely horrible. Very very hard class. I would not take it nor advise anyone to take it.

2.0
4.0
POL129
Mar 6, 2008

The most dissappointing class I ever had. His lectures are bland and he makes no effort to make them interesting. It was very difficult to form a cohesive narrative on his courses due to his inability to stimulate in his lectures. I highly advise dropping his classes if you can. You've been warned.

3.0
4.0
POL3
Mar 20, 2008

His lectures put you to sleep, but he really knows his subject. Although he puts his lecture notes online, go to lecture because he'll put things on the test not found on the online notes. If you're really interested in foreign policy, this is a good class, otherwise, it's too boring and too hard as a filler.

2.0
5.0
POL3
Mar 22, 2008

Hard, hard, hard class! You gotta read avg of 50 pages a day. Trust me, boring textbooks. What's worse is the boring lectures. Difficult exams. Daily readings include current events, weekly magazines, and two textbooks.

1.0
5.0
POL129
Mar 23, 2008

A horrible professor. His lectures do nothing to prepare you for his tests and he requires you to buy about 7 books and, though he does not even mention a few of them in class, draws obscure material from them for his tests. By for a horrible experience, whether it is POL3 or 129 or anything, for those who enjoy political science, drop his classe

1.0
5.0
POL129
Mar 23, 2008

Maoz must have tenure or something because he absolutely fails as a lecturer. Avoid his classes whenever possible, dropping his classes is a no-brainer.

2.0
5.0
POL003
Mar 24, 2008

Look, the man is probably a genius when it comes to IR, and he's a hot shot in the politicalscience world, but he is just a terrible teacher. The amount of work for this introductory class was extremely excessive and unreasonable. The other professors who teach this class do not require nearly as much as Maoz, and they're probably more interesting.

2.0
4.0
POL03
Mar 25, 2008

yes, he's boring, and yes, there is a lot of reading, but we're in college people! get over it! if you have any interest in international relations or political science, then this class is a great way to explore that interest if you just take the initiative to do so. if you dont, then it's probably not the best GE/filler class to take.

3.0
3.0
POL003
Mar 27, 2008

His lecture style is dull and uninspiring, but it's worth going, because if you do you can do well in the class without paying much attention to the reading. Requires a fair amount of work for an intro class, but if you take it seriously, getting a C or above should be no problem.

1.0
5.0
POL129
Apr 25, 2008

Avoid Maoz unless you have an extreme interest in the subject area. That said, he is an extremely brilliant man and a leading expert in his field. However, he fails as a lecturer/teacher. Lectures are fast paced and confusing. Plus he requires 8 books and 2 readers. Tests draw from random portions of the books and include information not in lecture

3.0
2.0
POL003
Mar 12, 2009

He's hard to understand and very boring. He also has his ideas on which theories he likes and focuses ONLY on them making US do the reading on complex ideas that he won't like in your papers anyway. He has strict guidelines for the term paper. BUT the notes are online so you never have to go to lecture and that is really good.

4.0
4.0
IREH
Mar 16, 2009

I had Dr. Maoz for the IR Honors Seminar. Although the thesis is a lot of work he was an excellent mentor. His instructions are not the clearest, but he is more than willing to meet with students to help with the thesis. If you have the GPA for the honors seminar you should take the opportunity, especially if you want to go to grad school.

3.0
4.0
POL3
Mar 23, 2009

Maoz is easily one of the smarterst people in the IR field, but cannot transfer that knowledge into teaching whatsoever. the "brief" term paper is 4000 words. TONS of reading, none of which was really on the final. Very dull and boring lecture style. IR is still my major, so I still love it even though Maoz not the best introduction to it...

5.0
4.0
PS0003
Mar 25, 2009

Be prepared to work if you take a class taught by Maoz. I enjoyed the subject enormously but anything is fair game on an exam in his classes. Syllabus says discussion sections are mandatory but in reality, aren't. Be sure you can handle large amounts of reading, however.

2.0
5.0
POL3
Mar 29, 2009

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS WITH PROF. MAOZ. He is a nice guy but he is very hard to understand and his tests are IMPOSSIBLE to do well on. He is the head of the International Relations department and tries to make the class really really hard to make people think IR is a difficult subject. PLEASE SPARE YOURSELF AND TAKE THIS CLASS WITH ADIFFERENT PROF!

3.0
5.0
POL3
Mar 29, 2009

This class was very hard, and my mistake, I took it for my GE. I worked very hard. However the readings kinda clarified the teachings...not very much. At the end, I just ended searching for the synopsis of every reading for "review." Try to avoid if you don't need this class

2.0
5.0
POL135
Dec 7, 2009

this guy may be the head of IR and have some impressive credentials but his classes are a joke... incomprehensible and over-theoretical classes, unattainably high amounts of readings and a general disinterest toward his students means this class is extremely (largely unnecessarily) hard. Only take Maoz if you must and unless u enjoy bad word art.

4.0
5.0
POL136
Dec 7, 2009

Great class, but be prepared to take the heat on your GPA. It's really hard graded. I found that people with the best grades were good BSers rather than studious. I studies like a madman without great results.

3.0
5.0
POL135
Dec 10, 2009

SUPER HARD, fascinating topic. GPA killer & brain overload, but you learn lots. 1paper w/very stringent grading (TA has to grade hard). Mdterm/Final with 1long essay, 2short out of 3 and 5ID's out of 7. 1 short essays is curve-ball, so are the 2extra IDs; so you have no choice in final/mdterm. Final 1:20min long instead of 2hrs u'll b short on time

4.0
3.0
POL135
Dec 17, 2009

Excellent class, really interesting. Lectures aren't mandatory but if you attend them all and take decent notes, you can get by without doing the tremendous load of reading. I liked it and it didn't kill my GPA.

3.0
4.0
POL3
Feb 9, 2010

Do not take this class unless you absolutely HAVE to. I took it just for fun, and I regret it completely. The lectures are dull, the exams are hard, and instead of having just 1 paper, he has 2. One which he calls the "short paper" and one which he calls the "long paper". Basically, he's just trying to make the class really hard.

4.0
2.0
POL03
Mar 12, 2010

Overall a good professor with fair grading. Slightly difficult to understand sometimes as he has an accent but very well qualified to teach the class.

4.0
5.0
POL003
Mar 15, 2010

the man knows his stuff

5.0
4.0
POL003
Apr 11, 2010

Hard class with lots of reading, but if you attend lecture regularly you can skate through most of the reading. Tests and papers are fair. Only tricky part is the current events part of the final, if you aren't very up to date on international events this section will probably make you cry.

4.0
5.0
POL135
Dec 2, 2010

This class is tough. You're learning 100 years of history in a matter of weeks, and he is very thorough his lectures. Maoz is a tough grader with high expectations, but he sure knows his stuff. It's a super interesting class though

4.0
3.0
POL136
Jun 5, 2011

Hard but worth taking if youre in Poli Sci or IR

5.0
3.0
POL136
Aug 1, 2011

Tough at times, but totally worth it!

2.0
5.0
POL3
Oct 22, 2011

The teacher is okay but very boring. The class was the WORST thing ever. Unless you are an IR major, DON'T take this class. I thought I'd take it for GE and I'm really regretting it, especially since I have bio and chem to work with as well. This is a super hard class which will take too much time out of your day.

5.0
3.0
POL3
Nov 18, 2011

He is extremely knowledgeable and has an amazing resume. He has done so much which makes it so fascinating to learn from him. A lot of reading and tests are heavily based on the 2 textbooks. Tests are pretty hard. There is a 2000 word brief essay and 10 days later a 4000 word term paper was due. Very time consuming but it's worth it.

3.0
4.0
POL03
Dec 12, 2011

Professor Maoz is very well versed and definitely over-qualified for the job. Definitely read Russett, Starr, and Kinsella textbook. The TAs are really helpful for the term papers and will work with you to perfect them! Keeping up with current events is also advised as it is a part of the final! Overall an informative intro class though!

3.0
4.0
POL3
Dec 14, 2011

This class is a lot of work and reading, but if you have an interest in the subject it is worth taking. Two papers due within in one week and a lot of reading. Current event section on final had questions that weren't even current, rather general knowledge. Free response section was reasonable. TAs are awesome.

5.0
1.0
POL003
Dec 20, 2011

This class is easy to get an A in, simply go to lecture, skim the blue book (don't really need to read the purple one or any of the additional articles), and read over some current events every once in a while. Overall Zeev is a good professor and his accent is very easy to understand.

3.0
3.0
POL03
Feb 9, 2012

It is very clear that Maoz is an expert in his field, you will likely run into his name when you are doing research for the class. His class isn't necessarily hard: he curves his exams and depending on the TA the essays aren't graded that tough, however it is a lot of work especially for a lower level class. If you do the work you can get an A.

3.0
4.0
POL136
Mar 28, 2012

Do not take this class unless you are extremely interested. There is WAY too much material to cover in one quarter, and the amount of reading is ridiculous. You have to attend class to take notes, slides are just bullet points. Interesting class, but again WAY, WAY too much material, tests are pretty difficult!

1.0
5.0
POL144
May 23, 2012

unless you're planning on going to grad school in middle east studies (if you are this is perfect boot camp for you) do not waste your time this course will destroy your gpa and youll waste a quarter doing nothing but stressing out :(

1.0
5.0
POL3
Dec 6, 2013

WORST PROFESSOR EVER. He made the class VERY hard. Midterm needed to be curved- not typical for a lower division polisci class. Long essays that barely count for your grade. Final is impossible- a long essay, 2 short essays, short answer on IDs and mult choice section. He gives you about 150-200 IDs to study from. NEVER take him.

3.0
4.0
POL03
Dec 9, 2013

This professor really knows his stuff. He is one of the leading academics in political science and that comes across in lecture. If you do the reading, then the class is very manageable but there is a lot of it. I thought the subject was great and really enjoyed the class and the teacher. You have to be willing to work hard though. Not an easy A.

2.0
5.0
POL3
Dec 16, 2013

Professor knows what he is talking about, just that class is very dry! TA's are the ones who explain what you need to know. Midterm was super hard, needed to be curved. Make sure to know your currents events, its part of your final. First paper is about 5 pgs and the term paper is 10 pgs. DO NOT TAKE THIS PROFESSOR! Subject is fun but he is not!

3.0
5.0
POL3
Feb 9, 2014

If I had not taken this class for pf it would have tanked my gpa. There is an endless amount of reading. Lecture is dry and very difficult to pay attention to so record the class if you want to survive it. Provides no study guide. Stressssssfullllll.

3.0
4.0
POL3
Mar 7, 2014

He is a very knowledgeable professor. However, his class is not an easy class. The lectures are very dry, it's very hard to stay up. If you want a good grade go to your TA!

4.0
2.0
POL3
Jul 16, 2014

Pol 3 in my opinion was an interesting class and I liked it with professor maoz. The midterm and the final werent bad at all as long as you study. the two papers for this class were easy as well. lecture and discussion were pretty helpful I thought and his tas were nice and willing to help. overall he was good and made class enjoyable

4.0
5.0
POL136
Nov 1, 2014

I'm French, so this class was really difficult for me as it requires to get through an overwhelming amount of readings. The TAs are hyper tough graders so be prepared to be totally familiar with the dialectic of the course. However, this class is very intellectually stimulating.

4.0
4.0
136
Grade: A+
Dec 22, 2014

Professor Maoz's class is amazing. A lot of reading, so be prepared to skim. Unlike other students, I found grading on the tests and paper to be fair. Two tests (cumulative final), term paper, and participation count for the grade. Be sure to show up and do the reading beforehand! Overall, great professor and great experience in this class.

3.0
4.0
POL3
Mar 2, 2015

I took this class as a GE class, and I would say that I'm typically interested in politics and current events. So much reading and approximately 24 pages of writing for only 20% of the grade. Not worth it. Lectures didn't hold my attention at all. TA graded harshly and wasn't nice about it, either. DON'T TAKE THIS CLASS.

2.0
5.0
POL3
Mar 3, 2015

This class moved way too quickly and the slides were unorganized. I would only take this class if it were essential to my major. Tests are exrememly difficult, there is hardly any time to write the papers, and the TAs were not very helpful. There is also a significant ammount of reading to do that you will be tested on but is never discussed much.

2.0
4.0
POL003
Grade: A-
Mar 31, 2015

There is soooo much reading for this class. It feels like he has designed it believing that everyone in the class is a International Relations major, when in reality many students are taking this class as a GE. The readings are mostly scholarly articles and they use words that are very specific to the field that an intro class would not know.

4.0
4.0
POL3
Grade: A-
May 7, 2015

Maoz is a great professor. He knows SO MUCH and does not waste a single minute. Actively taking notes is crucial. If you're an IRPOL major or minor, this is a good foundation class. If not, still pretty interesting, but don't take if you can't devote some time to it. Not your easy A GE because there is a good amount of work involved.

2.0
3.0
POL136
Grade: A
Dec 13, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Maoz is a very well-respected and knowledgeable professor. If you're interested in the Arab-Israeli conflict or ME politics in general, this is a good class to take. But, talks fast and doesn't stop to emphasize important points. Tests aren't hard and he gives a meh study guide, a lot of "required" reading--I did none of it. Term paper, 2 tests.

Respected
Participation matters
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
4.0
POL136
Nov 29, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Assigns so much reading and tries to cover a ton in the span of 10 weeks, but his and his TA's grading is considerate of the material he expects you to know. Bad at responding to emails. I ended up researching a lot of the study terms for the exams from the internet/assigned books. PPTs are vague but the lectures themselves are very dense.

Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
POL136
Grade: C
Dec 10, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Never take this Professor he and his TA are lazy and rude. Assigns a ridiculous amount of reading and assigns homework even on Thanksgiving. Has a thick accent and speaks very fast and has sloppy lectures and power points. Hardest class and your time is better spent elsewhere. Again, DO NOT take Zeev ever again.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
4.0
POL135
Grade: B
May 14, 2019
Would take again

The content of this class was so interesting and the way he taught it was so comprehensive, I would definitely take his class again. Each lecture is heavy in content so go and take notes! I had a really good ta so that helped as well. We had one paper, a midterm, and a final. And he posted a study guide for each. I definitely recommend!

Gives good feedback
Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
3.0
3.0
POL135
Grade: A
Nov 16, 2019
Wouldn't take again

A pretty average class. Sometimes hard to follow without very organized slides, but by the end of the class I feel like I had a better understanding of the Middle East, so I figure that's a mark of a good prof. I think finding a study buddy is a good idea, at least to work through the study guide.

Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
POL136
Grade: B+
May 7, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Knowledgeable but do not take time to address students or help them figure out what he is saying. I would have never taken his class if it was the last professor teaching it.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
3.0
4.0
POL135
Grade: B
Dec 29, 2020
Would take again

His accent is difficult to understand and his lectures are pretty confusing, but he's one of the most cited intl relations scholars of all time and he was also a chief in the IDF so that's pretty cool

Respected
Get ready to read
So many papers
2.0
3.0
POL135
Grade: A+
Feb 11, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Knowledgeable in his field but he is unable to get the valuable information out there. Much of his lectures are oversimplified and he drones on. He takes an important/interesting topic and makes it boring. Out of 167 students in his class, only 20 people showed up. TA is extremely helpful and kind. The workload is decent and pretty simple.

4.0
4.0
POL135
Oct 24, 2021
Would take again

Zeev is brilliant. My only complaint is that hes way too nice to people who are rude to him. Hes honestly really impartial but people take things that are facts really personally. I really enjoyed this professor. People who dont like him either dont come to class or dont do the readings and then wonder why they did bad on the papers.

Participation matters
Graded by few things
4.0
4.0
POL135
Grade: A-
Feb 1, 2022
Would take again

Zeev Maoz is one of the most distinguished and cited professors at UCD. He is extremely knowledgable in ME history/politics, having fought in 3 wars for Israel. He is extremely balanced as a professor and is very fair in his criticisms. Despite this, he's very dry and his accent is hard to understand but don't let that deter you.

Respected
Test heavy
Tough grader
2.0
5.0
POL136
Feb 7, 2022
Wouldn't take again

He is a very very knowledgeable but his lectures go on and on. He packs so much into his lectures that it very difficult to retain information. He expects a lot for his exams and there is a lot of remember. There are only three things that go into the grade book (midterm/ term paper/ final).

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
POL136
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 3, 2022

Professor Maoz is very knowledge about the Middle East Conflict between Israel and Palestine and assigns discussion posts that are relevant to the course material to help with the understanding. His lectures are very dense meaning that the information will go in one ear and out the other during most lectures. Wrote and assigned one of his own books

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
POL136
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 18, 2022

Knowledgeable, but awful at teaching. Assigned 300+ pages of reading a week regularly. Lectures are dense, continuous, and monotonous. He expects you to remember over ~50 pages of pure information (120-150 concepts) for tests (which only have 8 questions) that determine 30-40% of your grade each. I can't describe how utterly stressful this class is

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
4.0
4.0
136
Grade: A-
Mar 19, 2022
Would take again

Professor Maoz is one of the best Middle East scholars of our time. A lot of people think his class is difficult since he teaches in a bit of an old school style, but he is incredibly knowledgeable. Show up to class, pay attention, do the main readings, and you’re fine. People giving him a bad rate are honestly weak. Shoutout Professor Maoz.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
POL136
Grade: A-
Mar 23, 2022

He needed to either streamline the study guides he provided or make the exams open note. The completed study guides, with all the information he wanted us to remember was over 25 pages long. He also rarely answers emails, if ever. This class caused me more stress than I wanted during my last quarter. Do not recommend.

Tough grader
Lots of homework
Test heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

23%

Textbook Required

29%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

89% confidence
Based on 13 grades
Most common grades:
A- (5)
A+ (2)
A (2)
Grade Distribution
A(4)B(2)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(6)
Based on 15 reported grades
A-: 5
A+: 2
A: 2
B: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (8)
Graded by few things (7)
Lecture heavy (5)
Respected (3)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
Participation matters (2)
Test heavy (2)
Tough grader (2)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.29 avg change
May
Dec
Feb
Oct
Feb
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PS0003

5.0

(1)

129

4.0

(1)

136

4.0

(2)

IREH

4.0

(1)

POL135

3.4

(10)
+9 more courses
Difficulty by Course

POLIT3

5.0

POL144

5.0

POL190

4.5

POL3

4.4

POL129

4.3

Similar Professors